Magrabi Farah, Baker Maureen, Sinha Ipsita, Ong Mei-Sing, Harrison Stuart, Kidd Michael R, Runciman William B, Coiera Enrico
Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Australia.
Health and Social Care Information Centre, Leeds, England.
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Mar;84(3):198-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 Jan 4.
To analyse patient safety events associated with England's national programme for IT (NPfIT).
Retrospective analysis of all safety events managed by a dedicated IT safety team between September 2005 and November 2011 was undertaken. Events were reviewed against an existing classification for problems associated with IT. The proportion of reported events per problem type, consequences, source of report, resolution within 24h, time of day and day of week were examined. Sub-group analyses were undertaken for events involving patient harm and those that occurred on a large scale.
Of the 850 events analysed, 68% (n=574) described potentially hazardous circumstances, 24% (n=205) had an observable impact on care delivery, 4% (n=36) were a near miss, and 3% (n=22) were associated with patient harm, including three deaths (0·35%). Eleven events did not have a noticeable consequence (1%) and two were complaints (<1%). Amongst the events 1606 separate contributing problems were identified. Of these 92% were predominately associated with technical rather than human factors. Problems involving human factors were four times as likely to result in patient harm than technical problems (25% versus 8%; OR 3·98, 95%CI 1·90-8.34). Large-scale events affecting 10 or more individuals or multiple IT systems accounted for 23% (n=191) of the sample and were significantly more likely to result in a near miss (6% versus 4%) or impact the delivery of care (39% versus 20%; p<0·001).
Events associated with NPfIT reinforce that the use of IT does create hazardous circumstances and can lead to patient harm or death. Large-scale patient safety events have the potential to affect many patients and clinicians, and this suggests that addressing them should be a priority for all major IT implementations.
分析与英格兰国家信息技术计划(NPfIT)相关的患者安全事件。
对2005年9月至2011年11月期间由专门的信息技术安全团队管理的所有安全事件进行回顾性分析。根据现有的与信息技术相关问题的分类对事件进行审查。检查每种问题类型的报告事件比例、后果、报告来源、24小时内的解决情况、一天中的时间和一周中的日期。对涉及患者伤害的事件和大规模发生的事件进行亚组分析。
在分析的850起事件中,68%(n = 574)描述了潜在危险情况,24%(n = 205)对护理提供有明显影响,4%(n = 36)为险些发生的失误,3%(n = 22)与患者伤害相关,包括三例死亡(0.35%)。11起事件没有明显后果(1%),两起为投诉(<1%)。在这些事件中,识别出1606个单独的促成问题。其中92%主要与技术因素而非人为因素相关。涉及人为因素的问题导致患者伤害的可能性是技术问题的四倍(25%对8%;OR 3.98,95%CI 1.90 - 8.34)。影响十名或更多个体或多个信息技术系统的大规模事件占样本的23%(n = 191),并且更有可能导致险些发生的失误(6%对4%)或影响护理提供(39%对20%;p<0.001)。
与NPfIT相关的事件强化了信息技术的使用确实会产生危险情况,并可能导致患者伤害或死亡。大规模患者安全事件有可能影响许多患者和临床医生,这表明解决这些问题应成为所有重大信息技术实施的优先事项。