• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Implementation of a health information technology safety classification system in the Veterans Health Administration's Informatics Patient Safety Office.在退伍军人健康管理局的信息学患者安全办公室中实施健康信息技术安全分类系统。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Jun 20;31(7):1588-1595. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae107.
2
Assessment of Health Information Technology-Related Outpatient Diagnostic Delays in the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System: A Qualitative Study of Aggregated Root Cause Analysis Data.美国退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中与健康信息技术相关的门诊诊断延迟评估:基于聚合根本原因分析数据的定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e206752. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6752.
3
Veterans' Preferences for Exchanging Information Using Veterans Affairs Health Information Technologies: Focus Group Results and Modeling Simulations.退伍军人对使用退伍军人事务部健康信息技术交换信息的偏好:焦点小组结果与建模模拟
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 23;19(10):e359. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8614.
4
A new methodological framework for hazard detection models in health information technology systems.一种用于健康信息技术系统中危害检测模型的新方法论框架。
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Dec;124:103937. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103937. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
5
Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify.安全使用电子健康记录和健康信息技术系统:信任但要验证。
J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec;9(4):177-89. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182a8c2b2.
6
Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems.利用 FDA 报告为健康信息技术安全问题提供分类依据。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):45-53. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000369. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
7
A comparative review of patient safety initiatives for national health information technology.国家卫生信息技术患者安全计划的比较性回顾。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):e139-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.11.014. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
8
Patient Safety Classifications for Health Information Technology (HIT) and Medical Devices: A Review on Available Systems.患者安全分类在医疗信息技术(HIT)和医疗设备中的应用:现有系统综述。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 16;293:153-160. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220362.
9
Usability Methods for Ensuring Health Information Technology Safety: Evidence-Based Approaches. Contribution of the IMIA Working Group Health Informatics for Patient Safety.确保健康信息技术安全的可用性方法:循证方法。国际医学信息学会患者安全健康信息学工作组的贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2013;8:20-7.
10
Health information technology and implementation science: partners in progress in the VHA.卫生信息技术与实施科学:VA 中的合作进展
Med Care. 2013 Mar;51(3 Suppl 1):S6-12. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182884509.

本文引用的文献

1
Classification of Health Information Technology Safety Events in a Pediatric Tertiary Care Hospital.儿科三级保健医院的健康信息技术安全事件分类。
J Patient Saf. 2023 Jun 1;19(4):251-257. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001119. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
2
Identifying Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) Usability Issues from Patient Safety Event Reports.从患者安全事件报告中识别电子医嘱录入系统(eMAR)的可用性问题。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021 Dec;47(12):793-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
3
Identifying Health Information Technology Usability Issues Contributing to Medication Errors Across Medication Process Stages.识别导致整个用药流程阶段用药错误的卫生信息技术可用性问题。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e988-e994. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000868.
4
Implementing High-Reliability Organization Principles Into Practice: A Rapid Evidence Review.将高可靠性组织原则付诸实践:快速证据回顾。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Jan 1;18(1):e320-e328. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000768.
5
How can we partner with electronic health record vendors on the complex journey to safer health care?在通往更安全医疗保健的复杂征程中,我们如何与电子健康记录供应商合作?
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2020 Oct;40(2):34-43. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21434. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
6
Medication safety incidents in paediatric oncology after electronic medication management system implementation.电子医嘱管理系统实施后儿科肿瘤的用药安全事件。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Nov;28(6):e13152. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13152. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
7
Workarounds Emerging From Electronic Health Record System Usage: Consequences for Patient Safety, Effectiveness of Care, and Efficiency of Care.电子健康记录系统使用中出现的变通方法:对患者安全、护理有效性和护理效率的影响
JMIR Hum Factors. 2017 Oct 5;4(4):e27. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.7978.
8
Improving the safety of health information technology requires shared responsibility: It is time we all step up.提高健康信息技术的安全性需要共同承担责任:是时候我们大家都行动起来了。
Healthc (Amst). 2018 Mar;6(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
9
Safety huddles to proactively identify and address electronic health record safety.进行安全碰头会以主动识别并解决电子健康记录的安全问题。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):261-267. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw153.
10
Improving patient safety reporting with the common formats: Common data representation for Patient Safety Organizations.使用通用格式改进患者安全报告:患者安全组织的通用数据表示形式。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Dec;64:116-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.09.020. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

在退伍军人健康管理局的信息学患者安全办公室中实施健康信息技术安全分类系统。

Implementation of a health information technology safety classification system in the Veterans Health Administration's Informatics Patient Safety Office.

机构信息

Pharmacy Benefits Management Clinical Informatics, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC 20420, United States.

Certified Usability Analyst, Informatics Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC 20420, United States.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Jun 20;31(7):1588-1595. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae107.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocae107
PMID:38758666
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11187429/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Implement the 5-type health information technology (HIT) patient safety concern classification system for HIT patient safety issues reported to the Veterans Health Administration's Informatics Patient Safety Office.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A team of informatics safety analysts retrospectively classified 1 year of HIT patient safety issues by type of HIT patient safety concern using consensus discussions. The processes established during retrospective classification were then applied to incoming HIT safety issues moving forward.

RESULTS

Of 140 issues retrospectively reviewed, 124 met the classification criteria. The majority were HIT failures (eg, software defects) (33.1%) or configuration and implementation problems (29.8%). Unmet user needs and external system interactions accounted for 20.2% and 10.5%, respectively. Absence of HIT safety features accounted for 2.4% of issues, and 4% did not have enough information to classify.

CONCLUSION

The 5-type HIT safety concern classification framework generated actionable categories helping organizations effectively respond to HIT patient safety risks.

摘要

目的

为向退伍军人事务部信息学患者安全办公室报告的医疗信息技术(HIT)患者安全问题实施 5 型 HIT 患者安全关注分类系统。

材料与方法

一组信息安全分析师通过共识讨论,按照 HIT 患者安全关注的类型对 1 年的 HIT 患者安全问题进行回顾性分类。随后,将在回顾性分类过程中建立的流程应用于未来的 HIT 安全问题。

结果

在回顾性审查的 140 个问题中,有 124 个符合分类标准。大多数是 HIT 故障(例如软件缺陷)(33.1%)或配置和实施问题(29.8%)。未满足用户需求和外部系统交互分别占 20.2%和 10.5%。HIT 安全功能缺失占问题的 2.4%,4%的问题没有足够的信息进行分类。

结论

5 型 HIT 安全关注分类框架生成了可操作的类别,帮助组织有效应对 HIT 患者安全风险。