Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK.
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Apr 1;511:747-55. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.055. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
This study evaluated the potential concentrations of four antibiotics: ciprofloxacin (CIP), sulfamethoxazole (SUF), trimethoprim (TRI) and erythromycin (ERY) throughout the rivers of Europe. This involved reviewing national consumption rates together with assessing excretion and sewage treatment removal rates. From this information, it was possible to construct best, expected and worst case scenarios for the discharge of these antibiotics into rivers. Consumption data showed surprising variations, up to 200-fold in the popularity of different antibiotics across different European nations. Using the water resources model GWAVA which has a spatial resolution of approximately 6×9 km, river water concentrations throughout Europe were predicted based on 31-year climate data. The modelled antibiotic concentrations were within the range of measurements reported previously in European effluents and rivers. With the expected scenario, the predicted annual-average antibiotic concentrations ranged between 0 and 10 ng/L for 90% by length of surface waters. In the worst case scenario concentrations could reach between 0.1 and 1 μg/L at the most exposed locations. As both predicted and observed sewage effluent concentrations were below reported effect levels for the most sensitive aquatic wildlife, no direct toxicity in rivers is expected. Predicted river concentrations for CIP and ERY were closest to effect levels in wildlife, followed by SUF which was 2-3 orders of magnitude lower. TRI appeared to be of the least concern with around 6 orders of magnitude difference between predicted and effect levels. However, mixture toxicity may elevate this risk and antibiotic levels of 0.1-1 μg/L in hotspots may contribute to local environmental antibiotic resistance in microorganisms.
环丙沙星(CIP)、磺胺甲恶唑(SUF)、甲氧苄啶(TRI)和红霉素(ERY)。这涉及到审查国家消费率,以及评估排泄和污水处理去除率。根据这些信息,可以构建这些抗生素排入河流的最佳、预期和最差情况。消费数据显示出令人惊讶的差异,不同欧洲国家对不同抗生素的流行程度相差高达 200 倍。使用水资源模型 GWAVA,其空间分辨率约为 6×9 公里,根据 31 年的气候数据预测了整个欧洲的河流水浓度。模拟的抗生素浓度在欧洲废水和河流中报道的测量值范围内。在预期情景下,预测的年平均抗生素浓度在 90%的地表水中介于 0 至 10ng/L 之间。在最坏的情况下,在最暴露的地点,浓度可能达到 0.1 至 1μg/L。由于预测和观察到的污水排放浓度均低于对最敏感水生野生动物的报道效应水平,因此预计河流中不会直接产生毒性。CIP 和 ERY 的预测河浓度与野生动物的效应水平最为接近,其次是 SUF,其浓度低 2-3 个数量级。TRI 似乎是最不用担心的,预测值与效应水平相差约 6 个数量级。然而,混合毒性可能会增加这种风险,热点地区的 0.1-1μg/L 的抗生素水平可能会导致微生物中局部环境抗生素耐药性的增加。