Demir Özlem Ece, Rowe Meredith L, Heller Gabriella, Goldin-Meadow Susan, Levine Susan C
Department of Psychology, The University of Chicago.
Graduate School of Education, Harvard University.
Dev Psychol. 2015 Feb;51(2):161-75. doi: 10.1037/a0038476.
This study examines the role of a particular kind of linguistic input--talk about the past and future, pretend, and explanations, that is, talk that is decontextualized--in the development of vocabulary, syntax, and narrative skill in typically developing (TD) children and children with pre- or perinatal brain injury (BI). Decontextualized talk has been shown to be particularly effective in predicting children's language skills, but it is not clear why. We first explored the nature of parent decontextualized talk and found it to be linguistically richer than contextualized talk in parents of both TD and BI children. We then found, again for both groups, that parent decontextualized talk at child age 30 months was a significant predictor of child vocabulary, syntax, and narrative performance at kindergarten, above and beyond the child's own early language skills, parent contextualized talk and demographic factors. Decontextualized talk played a larger role in predicting kindergarten syntax and narrative outcomes for children with lower syntax and narrative skill at age 30 months, and also a larger role in predicting kindergarten narrative outcomes for children with BI than for TD children. The difference between the 2 groups stemmed primarily from the fact that children with BI had lower narrative (but not vocabulary or syntax) scores than TD children. When the 2 groups were matched in terms of narrative skill at kindergarten, the impact that decontextualized talk had on narrative skill did not differ for children with BI and for TD children. Decontextualized talk is thus a strong predictor of later language skill for all children, but may be particularly potent for children at the lower-end of the distribution for language skill. The findings also suggest that variability in the language development of children with BI is influenced not only by the biological characteristics of their lesions, but also by the language input they receive.
本研究考察了一种特定类型的语言输入——谈论过去和未来、假装以及解释,即脱离语境的谈话——在正常发育(TD)儿童以及产前或围产期脑损伤(BI)儿童的词汇、句法和叙事技能发展中的作用。已表明脱离语境的谈话在预测儿童语言技能方面特别有效,但原因尚不清楚。我们首先探究了父母脱离语境谈话的本质,发现无论是TD儿童还是BI儿童的父母,这种谈话在语言上都比情境化谈话更丰富。然后我们再次发现,对于这两组儿童来说,在孩子30个月大时父母的脱离语境谈话是其幼儿园阶段词汇、句法和叙事表现的重要预测指标,这一指标超出了孩子自身早期语言技能、父母的情境化谈话以及人口统计学因素的影响。对于30个月大时句法和叙事技能较低的儿童,脱离语境的谈话在预测幼儿园阶段的句法和叙事结果方面发挥了更大作用;而且对于BI儿童,脱离语境的谈话在预测幼儿园叙事结果方面比TD儿童发挥的作用更大。两组之间的差异主要源于BI儿童的叙事(而非词汇或句法)得分低于TD儿童这一事实。当两组儿童在幼儿园阶段的叙事技能方面进行匹配时,脱离语境的谈话对BI儿童和TD儿童叙事技能的影响并无差异。因此,脱离语境的谈话是所有儿童后期语言技能的有力预测指标,但对于语言技能分布处于较低水平的儿童可能尤为有效。研究结果还表明,BI儿童语言发展的变异性不仅受到其损伤生物学特征的影响,还受到他们所接受的语言输入的影响。