Giles-Vernick Tamara, Traoré Abdoulaye, Bainilago Louis
Unité d'Epidémiologie des Maladies Emergentes, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Centre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme and Groupe de Recherche Action en Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Med Anthropol Q. 2016 Jun;30(2):203-21. doi: 10.1111/maq.12187. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
This comparative study explores incertitude about hepatitis B (HBV) and its implications for childhood vaccination in Bangui, Central African Republic, and the Cascades region, Burkina Faso. Anthropological approaches to vaccination, which counter stereotypes of "ignorant" publics needing education to accept vaccination, excavate alternative ways of knowing about illness and vaccination. We build on these approaches, evaluating different kinds of incertitude (ambiguity, uncertainty, ignorance) about infancy, HBV, health protection, and vaccination. Using interviews and participant observation, we find that Bangui and Cascades publics framed their incertitude differently through stories of infancy, illness, and protection. We locate different forms of incertitude within their historical contexts to illuminate why vaccination practices differ in the Cascades region and Bangui. A more nuanced approach to incomplete knowledge, situated in political, economic, and social histories of the state and vaccination, can contribute to more appropriate global health strategies to improve HBV prevention.
这项比较研究探讨了中非共和国班吉以及布基纳法索瀑布地区对乙型肝炎(HBV)的不确定性及其对儿童疫苗接种的影响。人类学的疫苗接种方法反对那种认为“无知”公众需要接受教育才能接受疫苗接种的刻板印象,挖掘出了解疾病和疫苗接种的其他方式。我们基于这些方法,评估了关于婴儿期、HBV、健康保护和疫苗接种的不同类型的不确定性(模糊性、不确定性、无知)。通过访谈和参与观察,我们发现班吉和瀑布地区的公众通过婴儿期、疾病和保护的故事以不同方式构建了他们的不确定性。我们将不同形式的不确定性置于其历史背景中,以阐明为什么瀑布地区和班吉的疫苗接种做法存在差异。一种更细致入微地处理不完整知识的方法,结合国家和疫苗接种的政治、经济和社会历史,可以有助于制定更合适的全球卫生战略,以改善乙肝预防。