Roßbach Björn Peter, Pietschmann Matthias Frank, Gülecyüz Mehmet Fatih, Niethammer Thomas Richard, Ficklscherer Andreas, Wild Stefan, Jansson Volkmar, Müller Peter Ernst
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Munich, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Arch Med Sci. 2014 Dec 22;10(6):1147-52. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2014.47825.
Knee arthroscopy knee is gold standard in diagnosis and simultaneous treatment of knee disorders. But most patients undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before arthroscopy, although MRI results are not always consistent with arthroscopic findings. This raises the question in which suspected diagnoses MRI really has influence on diagnosis and consecutive surgical therapy.
Preoperative MRI of 330 patients with knee disorders were compared with arthroscopic findings. The MRI were performed by 23 radiologists without specialization in musculoskeletal diagnostics. Specificity, sensitivity, negative/positive predictive value and accuracy of MRI were calculated in comparison to arthroscopic findings.
We found sensitivity/specificity of 58%/93% for anterior horn, 94%/46% for posterior horn of medial meniscus and 71%/81% for anterior and 62%/82% for posterior horn of lateral meniscus. Related to anterior cruciate ligament injuries we showed sensitivity/specificity of 82%/91% for grade 0 + I and 72%/96% for grade II + III. For Cartilage damage sensitivity/specificity of 98%/7% for grade I-, 89%/29% for grade II-, 96%/38% for grade III- and 96%/69% for grade IV-lesions were revealed.
The MRI should not be used as routine diagnostic tool for knee pain. No relevant information for meniscal lesions and anterior cruciate ligament ruptures has been gained with MRI from non-specialized outside imaging centres. The MRI should not be used as routine diagnostic tool for knee pain. No relevant information for meniscal lesions and anterior cruciate ligament ruptures has been gained with MRI from non-specialized outside imaging centres.
膝关节镜检查是诊断和同时治疗膝关节疾病的金标准。但大多数患者在关节镜检查前会进行磁共振成像(MRI),尽管MRI结果并不总是与关节镜检查结果一致。这就引发了一个问题,即在哪些疑似诊断中MRI对诊断和后续手术治疗真的有影响。
将330例膝关节疾病患者的术前MRI与关节镜检查结果进行比较。MRI由23名非肌肉骨骼诊断专业的放射科医生进行。与关节镜检查结果相比,计算MRI的特异性、敏感性、阴性/阳性预测值和准确性。
我们发现内侧半月板前角的敏感性/特异性为58%/93%,后角为94%/46%,外侧半月板前角为71%/81%,后角为62%/82%。对于前交叉韧带损伤,0 + I级的敏感性/特异性为82%/91%,II + III级为72%/96%。对于软骨损伤,I-级的敏感性/特异性为98%/7%,II-级为89%/29%,III-级为96%/38%,IV-级为96%/69%。
MRI不应作为膝关节疼痛的常规诊断工具。来自非专业外部影像中心的MRI对于半月板损伤和前交叉韧带断裂没有获得相关信息。MRI不应作为膝关节疼痛的常规诊断工具。来自非专业外部影像中心的MRI对于半月板损伤和前交叉韧带断裂没有获得相关信息。