• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Population perception of surgical approach in minimally invasive surgery.公众对微创手术手术方式的认知。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Jan-Feb;9(1-2):E1-4. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2116.
2
Minimally Invasive Surgery Survey: A Survey of Surgical Team Members' Perceptions for Successful Minimally Invasive Surgery.微创手术调查:对外科团队成员对成功微创手术认知的调查
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;24(7):1152-1157.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.06.025. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
3
The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.正式机器人住院医师培训对年轻结直肠外科医师采用微创手术的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2018 May-Jun;75(3):767-778. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
4
Patient Perceptions of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spine Surgery.患者对微创脊柱手术与开放脊柱手术的认知
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Apr;31(3):E184-E192. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000618.
5
Perioperative outcomes and cosmesis analysis of patients undergoing laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy: a comparison of transumbilical, transperitoneal subcostal, and retroperitoneal subcostal approaches.经脐、经腹腔肋缘下和经腹膜后入路腹腔镜下单部位肾上腺切除术患者的围手术期结果和美容效果分析。
Urology. 2013 Aug;82(2):358-64. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.060.
6
7
Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.I度退行性腰椎滑脱症的微创与开放融合手术:质量结果数据库分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17188.
8
Complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: an analysis of minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgical techniques.成人脊柱畸形手术的并发症:微创、混合及开放手术技术分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2014 May;36(5):E15. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.FOCUS13534.
9
The variability of practice in minimally invasive thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections.肺切除微创手术的实践差异。
Thorac Surg Clin. 2008 Aug;18(3):235-47. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2008.06.002.
10
A new perspective on the value of minimally invasive colorectal surgery-payer, provider, and patient benefits.微创结直肠手术价值的新视角——支付方、医疗服务提供者及患者的益处
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2846-2853. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5295-x. Epub 2016 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for patients with symptomatic urachal remnants: an experience with 57 patients.经脐腹腔镜单部位手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗症状性脐尿管残余患者的比较:57 例经验总结。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 May;53(5):855-861. doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02746-x. Epub 2021 Jan 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-reported satisfaction and cosmesis outcomes following laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy.腹腔镜肾上腺切除术后患者报告的满意度和美容效果:经腹腔镜单孔肾上腺切除术与传统腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的比较
Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 Jan-Feb;8(1-2):E20-5. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1543.
2
Patient-reported body image and cosmesis outcomes following kidney surgery: comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site, laparoscopic, and open surgery.肾手术后患者报告的身体形象和美容效果:腹腔镜单部位、腹腔镜和开放手术的比较。
Eur Urol. 2011 Nov;60(5):1097-104. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
3
Female population perception of conventional laparoscopy, transumbilical LESS, and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy.女性人群对传统腹腔镜、经脐LESS 和经阴道NOTES 胆囊切除术的认知。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jul;25(7):2308-15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1554-4. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
4
First prize: Standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: a randomized comparative study.一等奖:标准腹腔镜供肾切除术与经腹腔镜单部位供肾切除术的随机对照研究。
J Endourol. 2011 Mar;25(3):365-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0250. Epub 2011 Jan 3.
5
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus standard laparoscopic simple nephrectomy: a prospective randomized study.经脐单孔腹腔镜手术与标准腹腔镜单纯肾切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Endourol. 2010 Aug;24(8):1315-20. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0048.
6
Population perception of surgical safety and body image trauma: a plea for scarless surgery?人群对手术安全性和身体形象创伤的认知:是否呼吁无疤痕手术?
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):408-15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1180-1. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
7
EAES recommendations on methodology of innovation management in endoscopic surgery.EAES 关于内镜外科学创新管理方法的建议。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jul;24(7):1594-615. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0818-3. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
8
Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison.腹腔镜单部位(LESS)与标准腹腔镜左供肾切除术:配对比较。
Eur Urol. 2010 Jan;57(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.023. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
9
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial hundred patients.腹腔镜单孔手术:首批百名患者
Urology. 2009 Oct;74(4):805-12. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.02.083. Epub 2009 Jul 30.
10
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for nephrectomy as a feasible alternative to traditional laparoscopy.腹腔镜单部位手术行肾切除术作为传统腹腔镜手术的一种可行替代方法。
Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):100-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.028. Epub 2009 Jul 22.

公众对微创手术手术方式的认知。

Population perception of surgical approach in minimally invasive surgery.

作者信息

Inoue Shogo, Kajiwara Mitsuru, Teishima Jun, Matsubara Akio

机构信息

Department of Urology, Hiroshima University Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Jan-Feb;9(1-2):E1-4. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2116.

DOI:10.5489/cuaj.2116
PMID:25624959
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4301961/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to better understand the impact that public opinion might have on surgical approaches in urologic minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

METHODS

We collected surveys from 400 participants, including the general population (n = 220) and paramedical staff (n = 180). Participants were anonymous. The survey included 16 questions on the characteristics and preference for the surgical approach if a urologic MIS were performed on them.

RESULTS

The responders preferred the transumbilical approach (57.0%) to the subcostal approach (43.0%). In particular, the preference for a transumbilical approach was significantly higher in females (65.1% vs. 49.3%, p = 0.0014). Similarly, when participants were divided into two groups (<50 years and ≥50 years), the preference for the transumbilical approach was significantly higher in the younger group (60.8% vs. 48.0%, p = 0.0187). Logistic regression analysis revealed that preference for this approach was about 2 times more likely to rise in the females (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Preference for the transumbilical approach was significantly higher young female respondents. This patient subset most values the cosmetic benefits of transumbilical approach in urologic MIS.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是更好地了解公众舆论可能对泌尿外科微创手术(MIS)手术方式产生的影响。

方法

我们收集了400名参与者的调查问卷,其中包括普通人群(n = 220)和医护辅助人员(n = 180)。参与者均为匿名。该调查问卷包含16个关于如果对他们进行泌尿外科MIS手术,其手术方式的特点和偏好的问题。

结果

与肋下途径(43.0%)相比,应答者更倾向于经脐途径(57.0%)。特别是,女性对经脐途径的偏好明显更高(65.1%对49.3%,p = 0.0014)。同样,当参与者被分为两组(<50岁和≥50岁)时,年轻组对经脐途径的偏好明显更高(60.8%对48.0%,p = 0.0187)。逻辑回归分析显示,女性对这种手术方式的偏好增加的可能性约为两倍(p = 0.032)。

结论

年轻女性应答者对经脐途径的偏好明显更高。这一患者亚组最看重经脐途径在泌尿外科MIS中的美容效果。