• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EAES 关于内镜外科学创新管理方法的建议。

EAES recommendations on methodology of innovation management in endoscopic surgery.

机构信息

Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Campus Cologne-Merheim, University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Jul;24(7):1594-615. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0818-3. Epub 2010 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-009-0818-3
PMID:20054575
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Under the mandate of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) a guideline on methodology of innovation management in endoscopic surgery has been developed. The primary focus of this guideline is patient safety, efficacy, and effectiveness.

METHODS

An international expert panel was invited to develop recommendations for the assessment and introduction of surgical innovations. A consensus development conference (CDC) took place in May 2009 using the method of a nominal group process (NGP). The recommendations were presented at the annual EAES congress in Prague, Czech Republic, on June 18th, 2009 for discussion and further input. After further Delphi processes between the experts, the final recommendations were agreed upon.

RESULTS

The development and implementation of innovations in surgery are addressed in five sections: (1) definition of an innovation, (2) preclinical and (3) clinical scientific development, (4) scientific approval, and (5) implementation along with monitoring. Within the present guideline each of the sections and several steps are defined, and several recommendations based on available evidence have been agreed within each category. A comprehensive workflow of the different steps is given in an algorithm. In addition, issues of health technology assessment (HTA) serving to estimate efficiency followed by ethical directives are given.

CONCLUSIONS

Innovations into clinical practice should be introduced with the highest possible grade of safety for the patient (nil nocere: do no harm). The recommendations can contribute to the attainment of this objective without preventing future promising diagnostic and therapeutic innovations in the field of surgery and allied techniques.

摘要

背景

根据欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)的授权,制定了内镜外科创新管理方法指南。本指南的主要重点是患者安全、疗效和有效性。

方法

邀请国际专家小组制定评估和引入外科创新的建议。共识发展会议(CDC)于 2009 年 5 月采用名义群体流程(NGP)的方法举行。建议于 2009 年 6 月 18 日在捷克共和国布拉格举行的 EAES 年会上提出讨论并进一步提出意见。在专家之间进行进一步的 Delphi 流程后,最终达成了建议。

结果

本指南涉及手术创新的开发和实施,分为五个部分:(1)创新定义,(2)临床前和(3)临床科学发展,(4)科学批准,(5)实施和监测。在本指南中,每个部分和几个步骤都有定义,并且在每个类别中都根据现有证据达成了一些建议。不同步骤的综合工作流程在算法中给出。此外,还介绍了用于估计效率的卫生技术评估(HTA)问题,然后是道德指令。

结论

应将创新引入临床实践,以确保患者尽可能高的安全等级(nil nocere:不要伤害)。这些建议有助于实现这一目标,而不会阻止未来在外科和相关技术领域出现有前途的诊断和治疗创新。

相似文献

1
EAES recommendations on methodology of innovation management in endoscopic surgery.EAES 关于内镜外科学创新管理方法的建议。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jul;24(7):1594-615. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0818-3. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
EAES and SAGES 2018 consensus conference on acute diverticulitis management: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.EAES 和 SAGES 2018 急性憩室炎管理共识会议:临床实践的循证推荐。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2726-2741. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06882-z. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
4
Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).腹腔镜处理急性腹痛:来自意大利内镜外科学会及新技术协会(SICE)、意大利外科医师协会(ACOI)、意大利外科学会(SIC)、意大利紧急和创伤外科学会(SICUT)、意大利私立医院外科学会(SICOP)和欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)的共识发展会议。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Aug;26(8):2134-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2331-3. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
5
Laparoscopic splenectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).腹腔镜脾切除术:欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)临床实践指南
Surg Endosc. 2008 Apr;22(4):821-48. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9735-5. Epub 2008 Feb 22.
6
A research agenda for the European Association for Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES).欧洲内镜外科医生协会(EAES)的一项研究议程。
Surg Endosc. 2017 May;31(5):2042-2049. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5531-z. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
7
[Statement: Requirements for the assessment of surgical innovations].[声明:外科创新评估的要求]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(3):220-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jun 13.
8
Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic neoplasms: the European association for endoscopic surgery clinical consensus conference.胰腺肿瘤的腹腔镜手术:欧洲内镜外科学会临床共识会议
Surg Endosc. 2017 May;31(5):2023-2041. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5414-3. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
9
Abstracts of the 17th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Prague, Czech Republic, 17--20 June 2009.欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)第17届国际大会摘要,捷克共和国布拉格,2009年6月17日至20日。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Apr;24 Suppl 1:1-181. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0975-4.
10
Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.国际循证指南关于多囊卵巢综合征评估和管理的推荐意见。
Fertil Steril. 2018 Aug;110(3):364-379. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying and reporting modifications to surgical innovation: a systematic review of IDEAL/IDEAL-D studies.识别并报告手术创新的改进:对IDEAL/IDEAL-D研究的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 30;15(6):e097097. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097097.
2
Balancing Ethics and Innovation: Can Artificial Intelligence Safely Transform Emergency Surgery? A Narrative Perspective.平衡伦理与创新:人工智能能否安全变革急诊外科?叙事视角
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 30;14(9):3111. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093111.
3
Gaps in the evidence underpinning high-risk medical devices in Europe at market entry, and potential solutions.

本文引用的文献

1
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.
2
No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations.未经评估,不得进行手术创新:IDEAL 建议
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1105-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8.
3
Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation.评估手术创新的挑战。
高风险医疗器械在进入欧洲市场时的证据基础存在差距,以及潜在的解决方案。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Jul 25;18(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02801-7.
4
Surgical trial design for incorporating the effects of learning: what is the current methodological guidance, and is it sufficient?将学习效果纳入外科试验设计:当前的方法学指导是什么,是否足够?
Trials. 2023 Apr 25;24(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07265-5.
5
Impacted Common Bile Duct Stone Managed by Hepaticoduodenostomy.肝十二指肠吻合术治疗胆总管嵌顿结石
Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 21;16(3):675-679. doi: 10.1159/000518928. eCollection 2022 Sep-Dec.
6
Impacted common bile duct stone managed by hepaticoduodenostomy.通过肝十二指肠吻合术治疗的胆总管嵌顿结石
J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Apr 25;2022(4):rjac148. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjac148. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Cholecystectomy for Complicated Gallbladder and Common Biliary Duct Stones: Current Surgical Management.复杂性胆囊及胆总管结石的胆囊切除术:当前的手术治疗方法
Front Surg. 2020 Jul 21;7:42. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.00042. eCollection 2020.
8
Insight into the methodology and uptake of EAES guidelines: a qualitative analysis and survey by the EAES Consensus & Guideline Subcommittee.深入了解 EAES 指南的方法学和采用情况:EAES 共识和指南小组委员会的定性分析和调查。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1238-1246. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07494-8. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
9
Conceptualising Surgical Innovation: An Eliminativist Proposal.概念化手术创新:消除主义提案。
Health Care Anal. 2020 Mar;28(1):73-97. doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00380-y.
10
The scientific report from the first pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) procedures performed in the eastern part of Central Europe.中欧东部首次进行的腹腔内加压气雾化疗(PIPAC)手术的科学报告。
J Int Med Res. 2018 Sep;46(9):3748-3758. doi: 10.1177/0300060518778637. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1097-104. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2.
4
Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations.外科创新的评估与阶段
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1089-96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7.
5
Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery.外科随机临床试验中的偏倚风险评估
Br J Surg. 2009 Apr;96(4):342-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6558.
6
Surgical innovation and ethical dilemmas: precautions and proximity.手术创新与伦理困境:预防措施与接近度
Cleve Clin J Med. 2008 Nov;75 Suppl 6:S7-12. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.75.suppl_6.s7.
7
Proficiency-gain curve for an advanced laparoscopic procedure defined by observation clinical human reliability assessment (OCHRA).由观察性临床人员可靠性评估(OCHRA)定义的一种高级腹腔镜手术的技能熟练度提升曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Apr;23(4):869-75. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0088-5. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
8
Bias in surgical research.外科研究中的偏倚
Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):180-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176bf4b.
9
Should ethics consultants help clinicians face scarcity in their practice?伦理顾问是否应该帮助临床医生应对其执业过程中的资源稀缺问题?
J Med Ethics. 2008 Apr;34(4):241-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019828.
10
Physicians' views on resource availability and equity in four European health care systems.欧洲四个医疗保健系统中医师对资源可用性和公平性的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug 31;7:137. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-137.