• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EASY(早期为您提供支持)病假服务:对旷工影响的四年评估。

The EASY (Early Access to Support for You) sickness absence service: a four-year evaluation of the impact on absenteeism.

作者信息

Brown Judith, Mackay Daniel, Demou Evangelia, Craig Joyce, Frank John, Macdonald Ewan B

机构信息

Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015 Mar;41(2):204-15. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3480. Epub 2015 Jan 23.

DOI:10.5271/sjweh.3480
PMID:25626136
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In May 2008, the National Health Service (NHS) Lanarkshire (NHSL) implemented a unique telephone-based sickness absence management service entitled "EASY" (Early Access to Support for You). The EASY service supplements existing absence policies and enables telephone communication between the absentee, their line manager, and the EASY service from the first day of absence and referral to occupational health services at day ten. The aim of this study was to determine if the EASY service was effective between May 2008 and May 2012 in reducing sickness absence in NHSL compared to normal occupational healthcare in NHS Scotland and is, as such, a cost-saving intervention.

METHODS

This study included time-series analysis of health board sickness absence data and analyses of the EASY service database (survival analyses and Cox's proportional hazards model).

RESULTS

The EASY service was effective in reducing sickness absence by 21% in NHSL, whereas the nonspecific tightening of the sickness absence policies across the rest of Scottish NHS health boards reduced sickness absence by approximately 9%. The richness of the EASY database gave detailed information on absentees by cause, duration, job family, and reporting compliance. The mean duration of musculoskeletal absences was significantly shorter in years 2, 3, and 4 compared to year 1. Those absentees contacted by phone on the first day of absence were more likely to return to work than those contacted on subsequent days. The EASY service improves economic efficiency; the value of the hours saved from the reduced sickness absence exceeds the cost of operating the service.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the importance of an early telephone-based intervention for sickness absence management.

摘要

目的

2008年5月,拉纳克郡国民保健服务(NHSL)实施了一项独特的基于电话的病假管理服务,名为“EASY”(Early Access to Support for You,即“为您提供早期支持”)。EASY服务对现有的缺勤政策起到补充作用,使缺勤员工、其直属经理以及EASY服务之间能够在缺勤的第一天就进行电话沟通,并在第十天转介至职业健康服务部门。本研究的目的是确定在2008年5月至2012年5月期间,与苏格兰国民保健服务体系(NHS)的正常职业医疗保健相比,EASY服务在减少NHSL的病假方面是否有效,以及它是否是一种节省成本的干预措施。

方法

本研究包括对健康委员会病假数据的时间序列分析以及对EASY服务数据库的分析(生存分析和考克斯比例风险模型)。

结果

EASY服务在NHSL有效减少了21%的病假,而苏格兰其他NHS健康委员会对病假政策的非特定收紧使病假减少了约9%。EASY数据库的丰富性提供了按病因、时长、工作类别和报告合规情况划分的缺勤员工详细信息。与第1年相比,第2、3和4年肌肉骨骼疾病缺勤的平均时长显著缩短。在缺勤第一天接到电话的员工比在后续几天接到电话的员工更有可能重返工作岗位。EASY服务提高了经济效率;因病假减少而节省的工时价值超过了运营该服务的成本。

结论

该研究突出了基于电话的早期干预对病假管理的重要性。

相似文献

1
The EASY (Early Access to Support for You) sickness absence service: a four-year evaluation of the impact on absenteeism.EASY(早期为您提供支持)病假服务:对旷工影响的四年评估。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015 Mar;41(2):204-15. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3480. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
2
An occupational health intervention programme for workers at high risk for sickness absence. Cost effectiveness analysis based on a randomised controlled trial.一项针对高病假风险工人的职业健康干预计划。基于随机对照试验的成本效益分析。
Occup Environ Med. 2008 Apr;65(4):242-8. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.033167. Epub 2007 Oct 12.
3
The effectiveness of two occupational health intervention programmes in reducing sickness absence among employees at risk. Two randomised controlled trials.两项职业健康干预计划在降低高危员工病假率方面的有效性。两项随机对照试验。
Occup Environ Med. 2008 Apr;65(4):236-41. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.032706. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
4
A novel approach to early sickness absence management: The EASY (Early Access to Support for You) way.一种早期病假管理的新方法:EASY(为您提供早期支持)方式。
Work. 2015;53(3):597-608. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152137.
5
Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people.改善抑郁症患者恢复工作的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 3(12):CD006237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub3.
6
Reducing sickness absence in occupational settings.减少职业环境中的病假缺勤情况。
Occup Environ Med. 2008 Apr;65(4):219-20. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.036061.
7
Process evaluation of a problem solving intervention to prevent recurrent sickness absence in workers with common mental disorders.解决问题干预预防常见精神障碍工人反复缺勤的过程评估。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jan;100:123-32. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.041. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of a Problem-Solving Intervention Aimed to Prevent Sickness Absence among Employees with Common Mental Disorders or Occupational Stress.旨在预防患有常见心理障碍或职业压力员工缺勤的问题解决干预措施的成本效益。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 20;17(14):5234. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145234.
9
Evaluating sickness absence duration by musculoskeletal and mental health issues: a retrospective cohort study of Scottish healthcare workers.通过肌肉骨骼和心理健康问题评估病假时长:一项针对苏格兰医护人员的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e018085. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018085.
10
Sickness absence among municipal workers in a Brazilian municipality: a secondary data analysis.巴西某城市市政工作人员的病假情况:二次数据分析
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Dec 28;10(1):773. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-3116-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurses' viewpoint of sustaining work despite musculoskeletal pain: A qualitative study.护士对尽管存在肌肉骨骼疼痛仍坚持工作的看法:一项定性研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Dec 28;13:481. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1689_23. eCollection 2024.
2
Process evaluation of a complex workplace intervention to prevent musculoskeletal pain in nursing staff: results from INTEVAL_Spain.一项旨在预防护理人员肌肉骨骼疼痛的复杂工作场所干预措施的过程评估:西班牙INTEVAL研究结果
BMC Nurs. 2021 Oct 6;20(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00716-x.
3
eHealth interventions to facilitate work participation: a scoping review.
电子健康干预措施促进工作参与:范围综述。
JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Oct;19(10):2739-2759. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00433.
4
A case management occupational health model to facilitate earlier return to work of NHS staff with common mental health disorders: a feasibility study.一种病例管理式的职业健康模式,以促进 NHS 员工常见精神健康障碍者更早地返回工作岗位:一项可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Feb;25(12):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta25120.
5
Multifaceted intervention for the prevention and management of musculoskeletal pain in nursing staff: Results of a cluster randomized controlled trial.多方面干预措施预防和管理护理人员肌肉骨骼疼痛:一项群组随机对照试验的结果。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 18;14(11):e0225198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225198. eCollection 2019.
6
Working conditions and compensated sickness absence among nurses and care assistants in Sweden during two decades: a cross-sectional biennial survey study.二十年来瑞典护士和护理助理的工作条件和补偿性病假:一项横断面两年期调查研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 10;9(11):e030096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030096.
7
Prevention and management of musculoskeletal pain in nursing staff by a multifaceted intervention in the workplace: design of a cluster randomized controlled trial with effectiveness, process and economic evaluation (INTEVAL_Spain).多方面干预工作场所护理人员肌肉骨骼疼痛的预防和管理:一项具有有效性、过程和经济评价的群组随机对照试验的设计(INTEVAL_Spain)。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 28;19(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6683-7.
8
The Influence of Social Support and Social Integration Factors on Return to Work Outcomes for Individuals with Work-Related Injuries: A Systematic Review.社会支持和社会融合因素对工伤后重返工作岗位结果的影响:系统评价。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Sep;29(3):636-659. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-09826-x.
9
Age, health and other factors associated with return to work for those engaging with a welfare-to-work initiative: a cohort study of administrative data from the UK's Work Programme.参与福利到工作倡议的人群中与重返工作岗位相关的年龄、健康及其他因素:一项基于英国工作项目行政数据的队列研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 27;8(10):e024938. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024938.
10
Working Health Services Scotland: a 4-year evaluation.苏格兰工作卫生服务机构:4 年评估。
Occup Med (Lond). 2018 Feb 16;68(1):38-45. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqx186.