Cheng Y, Lin Z
Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, S.A.R.
Indoor Air. 2015 Dec;25(6):662-71. doi: 10.1111/ina.12188. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
The motivation of this study is stimulated by a lack of knowledge about the difference of airflow characteristics between a novel air distribution method [i.e., stratum ventilation (SV)] and conventional air distribution methods [i.e., mixing ventilation (MV) and displacement ventilation (DV)]. Detailed air velocity and temperature measurements were conducted in the occupied zone of a classroom with dimensions of 8.8 m (L) × 6.1 m (W) × 2.4 m (H). Turbulence intensity and power spectrum of velocity fluctuation were calculated using the measured data. Thermal comfort and cooling efficiency were also compared. The results show that in the occupied zone, the airflow characteristics among MV, DV, and SV are different. The turbulent airflow fluctuation is enhanced in this classroom with multiple thermal manikins due to thermal buoyancy and airflow mixing effect. Thermal comfort evaluations indicate that in comparison with MV and DV, a higher supply air temperature should be adopted for SV to achieve general thermal comfort with low draft risk. Comparison of the mean air temperatures in the occupied zone reveals that SV is of highest cooling efficiency, followed by DV and then MV.
This study reports the unique profiles of flow, temperature, turbulence intensity, and power spectrum of stratum ventilation, which can have a number of implications for both knowledge and understanding of the flow characteristics in a stratum-ventilated room. With respect to the former, it expounds the fundamental characteristics of this air distribution method; and with respect to the latter, it reveals the mechanism of thermal comfort and energy saving under stratum ventilation.
本研究的动机源于对一种新型空气分布方法[即分层通风(SV)]与传统空气分布方法[即混合通风(MV)和置换通风(DV)]之间气流特性差异的认识不足。在一个长8.8米、宽6.1米、高2.4米的教室的人员活动区进行了详细的风速和温度测量。利用测量数据计算了速度波动的湍流强度和功率谱。还比较了热舒适性和冷却效率。结果表明,在人员活动区,MV、DV和SV的气流特性不同。由于热浮力和气流混合效应,在这个有多个热人体模型的教室里,湍流气流波动增强。热舒适性评估表明,与MV和DV相比,SV应采用更高的送风温度,以在低吹风风险下实现总体热舒适性。人员活动区平均气温的比较表明,SV的冷却效率最高,其次是DV,然后是MV。
本研究报告了分层通风的独特流动、温度、湍流强度和功率谱特性,这对于了解分层通风房间的流动特性可能具有多方面的意义。就前者而言,它阐述了这种空气分布方法的基本特性;就后者而言,它揭示了分层通风下热舒适性和节能的机制。