• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中生物可吸收血管支架的合理应用:有经验用户的推荐意见:荷兰关于生物可吸收血管支架应用的立场声明。

Appropriate use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in percutaneous coronary interventions: a recommendation from experienced users : A position statement on the use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Centre, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 GE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,

出版信息

Neth Heart J. 2015 Mar;23(3):161-5. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0651-3.

DOI:10.1007/s12471-015-0651-3
PMID:25626696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4352153/
Abstract

Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) have become a reliable revascularisation option to treat ischaemic coronary artery disease. Drug-eluting stents (DES) are widely used as first choice devices in many procedures due to their established good medium to long term outcomes. These permanent implants, however, do not have any residual function after vascular healing following the PCI. Beyond this initial healing period, metallic stents may induce new problems, resulting in an average rate of 2 % reinterventions per year. To eliminate this potential late limitation of permanent metallic DES, bioresorbable coronary stents or 'vascular scaffolds' (BVS) have been developed. In a parallel publication in this journal, an overview of the current clinical performance of these scaffolds is presented. As these scaffolds are currently CE marked and commercially available in many countries and as clinical evidence is still limited, recommendations for their general usage are needed to allow successful clinical introduction.

摘要

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)已成为治疗缺血性冠状动脉疾病的一种可靠的血运重建选择。由于其确立的良好的中至长期效果,药物洗脱支架(DES)在许多介入治疗中被广泛用作首选器械。然而,这些永久性植入物在 PCI 后血管愈合后没有任何残留功能。在这个初始愈合期之后,金属支架可能会引发新的问题,导致每年平均有 2%的患者需要再次介入治疗。为了消除永久性金属 DES 的这种潜在的晚期局限性,生物可吸收冠状动脉支架或“血管支架”(BVS)已经被开发出来。在本杂志的一篇平行文章中,对这些支架目前的临床性能进行了概述。由于这些支架目前已经在 CE 标志,并在许多国家和商业上可用,由于临床证据仍然有限,需要对其一般用途提出建议,以允许成功的临床引入。

相似文献

1
Appropriate use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in percutaneous coronary interventions: a recommendation from experienced users : A position statement on the use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in the Netherlands.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中生物可吸收血管支架的合理应用:有经验用户的推荐意见:荷兰关于生物可吸收血管支架应用的立场声明。
Neth Heart J. 2015 Mar;23(3):161-5. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0651-3.
2
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):537-544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00979-4. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
3
Recommendations for the use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in percutaneous coronary interventions : 2017 revision.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中生物可吸收血管支架使用的推荐意见:2017年修订版
Neth Heart J. 2017 Jul;25(7-8):419-428. doi: 10.1007/s12471-017-1014-z.
4
The use of bioresorbable vascular scaffold Absorb BVS® in patients with stable coronary artery disease: one-year results with special focus on the hybrid bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and drug eluting stents treatment.生物可吸收血管支架Absorb BVS®在稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者中的应用:特别关注混合生物可吸收血管支架和药物洗脱支架治疗的一年结果。
Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(7):627-33. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0250. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
5
Bioresorbable scaffolds for percutaneous coronary interventions.用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的生物可吸收支架
Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2014 Dec 31;2014(4):409-27. doi: 10.5339/gcsp.2014.55. eCollection 2014.
6
Intraindividual Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Drug-Eluting Metallic Stents.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与药物洗脱金属支架的个体化比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug;9(8). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003698.
7
8
Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架与依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 3;65(8):791-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.017.
9
Fully bioresorbable drug-eluting coronary scaffolds: A review.完全可生物吸收药物洗脱冠状动脉支架:综述
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Jun-Jul;108(6-7):385-97. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
10
[Hybrid percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent in combination with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for complex coronary lesions].
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2017 Sep;18(9 Suppl 1):21S-23S. doi: 10.1714/2743.27968.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Outcomes After Implantation of Magnesium-Based Bioresorbable Scaffolds-Insights From an All-Comer Registry.镁基生物可吸收支架植入后的长期预后——来自全人群注册研究的见解
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 14;9:856930. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.856930. eCollection 2022.
2
Long-term clinical results of biodegradable vascular scaffold ABSORB BVS™ using the PSP-technique in patients with acute coronary syndrome.采用PSP技术的可生物降解血管支架ABSORB BVS™治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的长期临床结果。
Cardiol J. 2020;27(6):677-684. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0018. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
3
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Tortuous Left Anterior Descending Artery with Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold via the Transradial Approach.经桡动脉途径使用生物可吸收血管支架对迂曲左前降支进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2018 Nov;34(6):530-532. doi: 10.6515/ACS.201811_34(6).20180818B.
4
Impact of PSP Technique on Clinical Outcomes Following Bioresorbable Scaffolds Implantation.PSP技术对生物可吸收支架植入术后临床结局的影响。
J Clin Med. 2018 Feb 6;7(2):27. doi: 10.3390/jcm7020027.
5
BRS implantation in long lesions requiring device overlapping: myth or reality?在需要器械重叠的长病变中植入生物可吸收支架:神话还是现实?
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Aug;9(Suppl 9):S914-S922. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.35.
6
Recommendations for the use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in percutaneous coronary interventions : 2017 revision.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中生物可吸收血管支架使用的推荐意见:2017年修订版
Neth Heart J. 2017 Jul;25(7-8):419-428. doi: 10.1007/s12471-017-1014-z.
7
Overlapping implantation of bioresorbable novolimus-eluting scaffolds: an observational optical coherence tomography study.生物可吸收西罗莫司洗脱支架的重叠植入:一项光学相干断层扫描观察性研究。
Heart Vessels. 2017 Jul;32(7):781-789. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0932-9. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
8
Patient profile and periprocedural outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in comparison with drug-eluting and bare-metal stent implantation. Experience from ORPKI Polish National Registry 2014-2015.生物可吸收血管支架植入与药物洗脱支架及裸金属支架植入相比的患者资料及围手术期结果。来自2014 - 2015年波兰国家心血管介入注册中心(ORPKI)的经验。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2016;12(4):321-328. doi: 10.5114/aic.2016.63632. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
9
Evaluation of bifurcation stenting techniques at Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven in 2013.2013年在埃因霍温的卡塔琳娜医院对分叉支架置入技术进行的评估。
Neth Heart J. 2017 Jan;25(1):40-46. doi: 10.1007/s12471-016-0911-x.
10
Post-dilatation after implantation of bioresorbable everolimus- and novolimus-eluting scaffolds: an observational optical coherence tomography study of acute mechanical effects.生物可吸收依维莫司和诺伐莫司洗脱支架植入后的后扩张:急性机械效应的光学相干断层扫描观察性研究
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Apr;106(4):271-279. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1048-z. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Current status of clinically available bioresorbable scaffolds in percutaneous coronary interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中临床可用的生物可吸收支架的现状。
Neth Heart J. 2015 Mar;23(3):153-60. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0652-2.
2
Second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation followed by 6- versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy: the SECURITY randomized clinical trial.第二代药物洗脱支架置入后 6 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:SECURITY 随机临床试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(20):2086-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
3
A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial.生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱支架与金属依维莫司洗脱支架治疗初发原生冠状动脉病变所致缺血性心脏病的比较(ABSORB II):一项随机对照临床试验的临床和操作次要终点 1 年中期分析。
Lancet. 2015 Jan 3;385(9962):43-54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61455-0. Epub 2014 Sep 14.
4
Clinical utility of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the optimisation of Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold deployment during percutaneous coronary intervention.光学相干断层扫描(OCT)在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间优化Absorb生物可吸收血管支架植入中的临床应用。
EuroIntervention. 2015 Feb;10(10):1154-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I10A190.
5
Risk stratification for long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后长期死亡率的风险分层。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(1):80-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000475. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
6
Heart disease in the Netherlands: a quantitative update.荷兰的心脏病:定量更新。
Neth Heart J. 2014 Jan;22(1):3-10. doi: 10.1007/s12471-013-0504-x.
7
Dynamics of vessel wall changes following the implantation of the absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a multi-imaging modality study at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months.依维莫司洗脱可吸收生物可降解血管支架植入后血管壁变化的动态研究:一项在6个月、12个月、24个月和36个月时进行的多成像模态研究
EuroIntervention. 2014 Mar 20;9(11):1271-84. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I11A217.
8
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:一项系统评价。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718.
9
Five-year clinical and functional multislice computed tomography angiographic results after coronary implantation of the fully resorbable polymeric everolimus-eluting scaffold in patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the ABSORB cohort A trial.经全吸收聚合物雷帕霉素洗脱支架冠状动脉植入治疗初发冠状动脉疾病患者的 5 年临床和功能多层螺旋 CT 血管造影结果:ABSORB 队列 A 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct;6(10):999-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.017.
10
Treatment costs of acute myocardial infarction in the Netherlands.荷兰急性心肌梗死的治疗费用。
Neth Heart J. 2013 May;21(5):230-5. doi: 10.1007/s12471-013-0386-y.