• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PSP技术对生物可吸收支架植入术后临床结局的影响。

Impact of PSP Technique on Clinical Outcomes Following Bioresorbable Scaffolds Implantation.

作者信息

Ortega-Paz Luis, Brugaletta Salvatore, Sabaté Manel

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinic, Biomedical Investigation Institute, IDIBAPS, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2018 Feb 6;7(2):27. doi: 10.3390/jcm7020027.

DOI:10.3390/jcm7020027
PMID:29415486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5852443/
Abstract

Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) were introduced in clinical practice to overcome the long-term limitations of newer-generation drug-eluting stents. Despite some initial promising results of the Absorb BRS, safety concerns have led to the discontinuation of the commercialization of this device. Several retrospective studies have assessed the impact of the so-called Pre-dilation, Sizing and Post-dilation (PSP) technique concluding that an optimal PSP technique can improve clinical outcomes following BRS implantation. In this article, the definition of the PSP technique, and the current evidence of its impact on clinical outcomes are put in perspective. Additionality, the relationship between the PSP technique and the dual-antiplatelet therapy to prevent scaffold thrombosis is addressed. Finally, the future perspectives of BRS technology in clinical practice are commented.

摘要

生物可吸收支架(BRS)被引入临床实践,以克服新一代药物洗脱支架的长期局限性。尽管Absorb BRS最初取得了一些令人鼓舞的结果,但安全问题导致该设备停止商业化。几项回顾性研究评估了所谓的预扩张、尺寸测量和后扩张(PSP)技术的影响,得出结论认为,最佳的PSP技术可以改善BRS植入后的临床结果。在本文中,PSP技术的定义及其对临床结果影响的当前证据得到了审视。此外,还讨论了PSP技术与预防支架血栓形成的双联抗血小板治疗之间的关系。最后,对BRS技术在临床实践中的未来前景进行了评论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6b/5852443/8dc8f4cb571c/jcm-07-00027-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6b/5852443/4f268fb15fc8/jcm-07-00027-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6b/5852443/b413bb5ed87a/jcm-07-00027-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6b/5852443/8dc8f4cb571c/jcm-07-00027-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6b/5852443/4f268fb15fc8/jcm-07-00027-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6b/5852443/b413bb5ed87a/jcm-07-00027-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6b/5852443/8dc8f4cb571c/jcm-07-00027-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of PSP Technique on Clinical Outcomes Following Bioresorbable Scaffolds Implantation.PSP技术对生物可吸收支架植入术后临床结局的影响。
J Clin Med. 2018 Feb 6;7(2):27. doi: 10.3390/jcm7020027.
2
Clinical results of bioresorbable drug-eluting scaffolds in short and long coronary artery lesions using the PSP technique.应用 PSP 技术治疗短和长冠状动脉病变的生物可吸收药物洗脱支架的临床结果。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0994-y.
3
Implantation techniques (predilatation, sizing, and post-dilatation) and the incidence of scaffold thrombosis and revascularisation in lesions treated with an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: insights from the AIDA trial.载有依维莫司的生物可吸收血管支架治疗病变时的植入技术(预扩张、定径和后扩张)以及支架血栓和再血管化发生率:来自 AIDA 试验的结果。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Jul 20;14(4):e434-e442. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01152.
4
Effect of Technique on Outcomes Following Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation: Analysis From the ABSORB Trials.生物可吸收血管支架置入术后技术对结局的影响:ABSORB 试验分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 12;70(23):2863-2874. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1106. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
5
Procedural Predictors for Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Thrombosis: Analysis of the Individual Components of the "PSP" Technique.生物可吸收血管支架血栓形成的手术预测因素:“PSP”技术各组成部分的分析
J Clin Med. 2019 Jan 15;8(1):93. doi: 10.3390/jcm8010093.
6
Predilation, sizing and post-dilation scoring in patients undergoing everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold implantation for prediction of cardiac adverse events: development and internal validation of the PSP score.在接受依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架植入术的患者中进行预扩张、尺寸测量和扩张后评分以预测心脏不良事件:PSP评分的开发与内部验证
EuroIntervention. 2017 Apr 20;12(17):2110-2117. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00974.
7
Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Coronary Intervention: Unmet Needs and Evolution.冠状动脉介入治疗中的生物可吸收支架:未满足的需求与发展
Korean Circ J. 2018 Jan;48(1):24-35. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2017.0194.
8
1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱支架的1年结局:GHOST-EU和XIENCE V美国注册研究的倾向匹配比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 14;9(5):440-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.042. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
9
Magmaris: a new generation metallic sirolimus-eluting fully bioresorbable scaffold: present status and future perspectives.玛格玛瑞斯:新一代金属西罗莫司洗脱全生物可吸收支架:现状与未来展望
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Aug;9(Suppl 9):S903-S913. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.34.
10
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds - Are We Facing a Time of Crisis or One of Breakthrough?生物可吸收血管支架——我们正面临危机时刻还是突破时刻?
Circ J. 2017 Jul 25;81(8):1065-1074. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0152. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A real-world experience with a thin-strut bioresorbable vascular scaffold system: a single-centre study.薄支撑可生物吸收血管支架系统的真实世界经验:一项单中心研究。
AsiaIntervention. 2025 Mar 20;11(1):26-34. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00033. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Current situation and overview of resorbable magnesium scaffolds: a perspective for overcoming the remaining issues of polymeric bioresorbable scaffold.可吸收镁支架的现状与概述:克服聚合物生物可吸收支架遗留问题的展望
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025 Apr;40(2):245-254. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-01070-w. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
3
Two-Year Outcomes for Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated with Magmaris and Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Large-Vessel Lesions.

本文引用的文献

1
Data from real-world registries: can it guide development of the bioresorbable scaffolds of tomorrow?
EuroIntervention. 2017 Dec 20;13(11):1259-1262. doi: 10.4244/EIJV13I11A197.
2
Characteristics, Predictors, and Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Coronary Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Differences Between Early and Late Events.冠状动脉生物可吸收支架内血栓形成的特征、预测因素和机制:早期和晚期事件的差异。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 11;10(23):2363-2371. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.020.
3
Effect of Technique on Outcomes Following Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation: Analysis From the ABSORB Trials.生物可吸收血管支架置入术后技术对结局的影响:ABSORB 试验分析。
使用Magmaris和Absorb生物可吸收支架治疗大血管病变的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的两年结局
J Pers Med. 2024 May 17;14(5):540. doi: 10.3390/jpm14050540.
4
Magnesium bioresorbable scaffold (Magmaris) versus polymer biodegradable ultrathin drug-eluting stent (Ultimaster) in acute coronary syndrome. Mid-term outcomes (2 years).急性冠状动脉综合征中镁生物可吸收支架(Magmaris)与聚合物可生物降解超薄药物洗脱支架(Ultimaster)的比较。中期结果(2年)
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024 Mar;20(1):67-75. doi: 10.5114/aic.2024.136901. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
5
Long-Term Outcomes After Implantation of Magnesium-Based Bioresorbable Scaffolds-Insights From an All-Comer Registry.镁基生物可吸收支架植入后的长期预后——来自全人群注册研究的见解
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 14;9:856930. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.856930. eCollection 2022.
6
Magnesium-based resorbable scaffold vs permanent metallic sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 3-year results of the MAGSTEMI randomised controlled trial.镁基可吸收支架与永久性金属西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的 3 年结果:MAGSTEMI 随机对照试验。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Aug 5;18(5):e389-e396. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00651.
7
Five-year angiographic, OCT and clinical outcomes of a randomized comparison of everolimus and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.依维莫司和生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架的 5 年血管造影、OCT 和临床结果随机比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):523-532. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29837. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
8
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds-Dead End or Still a Rough Diamond?生物可吸收血管支架——死胡同还是仍为璞玉?
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 7;8(12):2167. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122167.
9
Incidental Finding of Strut Malapposition Is a Predictor of Late and Very Late Thrombosis in Coronary Bioresorbable Scaffolds.支架贴壁不良的偶然发现是冠状动脉生物可吸收支架晚期和极晚期血栓形成的预测指标。
J Clin Med. 2019 Apr 27;8(5):580. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050580.
10
Long-term clinical results of biodegradable vascular scaffold ABSORB BVS™ using the PSP-technique in patients with acute coronary syndrome.采用PSP技术的可生物降解血管支架ABSORB BVS™治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的长期临床结果。
Cardiol J. 2020;27(6):677-684. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0018. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 12;70(23):2863-2874. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1106. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
4
3-Year Clinical Outcomes With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds: The ABSORB III Trial.采用依维莫司洗脱可吸收生物降解冠状动脉支架的 3 年临床结果:ABSORB III 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 12;70(23):2852-2862. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
5
Mechanisms of Very Late Bioresorbable Scaffold Thrombosis: The INVEST Registry.非常晚期生物可吸收支架血栓形成的机制:INVEST 注册研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 7;70(19):2330-2344. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.014.
6
Clinical, Angiographic, and Procedural Correlates of Acute, Subacute, and Late Absorb Scaffold Thrombosis.急性、亚急性和晚期吸收支架血栓形成的临床、血管造影和操作相关性。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 25;10(18):1809-1815. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.067.
7
2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗重点更新:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗特别工作组。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 14;39(3):213-260. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419.
8
2-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold for treatment of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised trials with an individual patient data substudy.2 年随访:Absorb 生物可吸收支架治疗冠状动脉疾病:7 项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析及一项个体化患者数据分析亚研究。
Lancet. 2017 Aug 19;390(10096):760-772. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31470-8. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
9
Potentially increased incidence of scaffold thrombosis in patients treated with Absorb BVS who terminated DAPT before 18 months.在18个月前停用双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的接受Absorb生物可吸收支架(BVS)治疗的患者中,支架血栓形成的发生率可能会增加。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Jun 2;13(2):e177-e184. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00119.
10
Bioresorbable Scaffolds versus Metallic Stents in Routine PCI.生物可吸收支架与金属支架在常规 PCI 中的应用比较。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 15;376(24):2319-2328. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614954. Epub 2017 Mar 29.