Rickert M, Arabmotlagh M, Carstens C, Behrbalk E, Rauschmann M, Fleege C
Abteilung für Wirbelsäulenorthopädie, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Friedrichsheim gGmbH, Marienburgstraße 2, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland,
Orthopade. 2015 Feb;44(2):162-9. doi: 10.1007/s00132-014-3072-x.
Sagittal imbalance, adjacent segment degeneration, and loss of correction due to cage sintering are the main reasons for revision surgery after lumbar fusion. Based on the experience from hip and knee replacement surgery, preoperative software-assisted planning combined with the corresponding cages is helpful to achieve better long-term results.
Evaluation of the procedure regarding intraoperative application of preoperative planning and examination to what extent the planning was correct.
In all, 30 patients were included in the period from September 2012 to May 2013 in an observational study, planned preoperatively with the planning software, and treated with the corresponding PLIF cages. The radiological evaluation was performed by thin-layer CT after 3 months.
A total of 24 (80%) patients were followed up after 3 months. In these 24 patients, the preoperative planning actually was correct in 17 cases with the intraoperatively implanted cage, which corresponds to a match of about 71%. The fusion rate for these 24 patients who underwent full examinations was 91.7%.
The results of this observational study to evaluate the planning of intervertebral cages show positive experience with this novel therapeutic concept. Despite the limited number of participants, good results were observed for the intraoperative implementation of the planned cages and an adequate fusion rate was obtained. Irrespective of this, a software-based surgical planning must be questioned critically any time. Ultimately, it is the surgeon's responsibility to modify the planned procedure intraoperatively if necessary. Currently, the influence of this planning regarding the long-term course and the important question of adjacent segment instability remains unanswered.
矢状面失衡、相邻节段退变以及椎间融合器烧结导致的矫正丢失是腰椎融合术后翻修手术的主要原因。基于髋膝关节置换手术的经验,术前软件辅助规划结合相应的椎间融合器有助于取得更好的长期效果。
评估术前规划在术中应用及检查方面的程序,以及规划的正确程度。
2012年9月至2013年5月期间,共纳入30例患者进行观察性研究,术前使用规划软件进行规划,并使用相应的后路腰椎椎间融合(PLIF)椎间融合器进行治疗。3个月后通过薄层CT进行影像学评估。
3个月后共对24例(80%)患者进行了随访。在这24例患者中,术中植入椎间融合器时,术前规划实际正确的有17例,匹配率约为71%。这24例接受全面检查的患者融合率为91.7%。
这项评估椎间融合器规划的观察性研究结果显示了这种新型治疗理念的积极经验。尽管参与者数量有限,但在术中植入规划的椎间融合器方面观察到了良好的效果,并获得了足够的融合率。尽管如此,基于软件的手术规划在任何时候都必须受到严格质疑。最终,如有必要,外科医生有责任在术中修改规划的手术程序。目前,这种规划对长期病程的影响以及相邻节段不稳定这一重要问题仍未得到解答。