• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少不可接受的漏服剂量:药剂师助理支持的药物管理

Reducing unacceptable missed doses: pharmacy assistant-supported medicine administration.

作者信息

Baqir Wasim, Jones Kate, Horsley William, Barrett Scott, Fisher David, Copeland Richard, Campbell David, Stephenson Rosemary

机构信息

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Pharmacy, North Tyneside Hospital, North Shields, UK.

Evaluation Research and Development Unit, School of Medicine, Health Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.

出版信息

Int J Pharm Pract. 2015 Oct;23(5):327-32. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12172. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1111/ijpp.12172
PMID:25628008
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The potential harm from omitted and delayed medicines for hospital inpatients was highlighted by the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA). Despite evidence of omitted doses, few interventional studies have been reported on preventing the problem. This study aimed to assess the impact on omitted doses when medicine administration was supported by pharmacy assistants (PAs).

METHODS

PAs were trained to support nurses on medicine administration rounds. Using stratified random sampling, two intervention and control wards were selected. Three study groups were defined: (A) intervention group (PA-supported medicine administration); (B) intra-ward control group; and (C) inter-ward control group. Primary outcome measure was number of patients with unacceptable omitted doses (UODs) in group A versus C. Secondary outcome measures were patients with critical UOD (cUOD), as defined by the NPSA, in groups A, B and C and UODs in group B versus A and C. Data were collected over 2 weeks (December 2011 and February 2012).

KEY FINDINGS

Using aggregated data over 2 weeks, 778 patients were assessed; 308 were male (40%). The overall proportion of patients with ≥1 UOD was 12.4% (n = 96). The proportion of patients with ≥1 UOD was 1.1% (n = 2) in group A (intervention) and 18.5% (n = 68) in group C (control). There were significantly fewer patients with cUOD in group A (1.1%; n = 2) compared with group C (7.4%; n = 27).

CONCLUSION

PA-supported medication rounds can significantly reduce the rate of omitted doses. This study provides evidence for a potential solution to the problem of omitted doses for hospital inpatients.

摘要

目的

国家患者安全机构(NPSA)强调了住院患者药物漏服和延迟服用可能造成的危害。尽管有药物漏服剂量的相关证据,但关于预防该问题的干预性研究报道较少。本研究旨在评估药房助理(PA)协助给药时对药物漏服剂量的影响。

方法

对药房助理进行培训,使其在给药查房时协助护士。采用分层随机抽样法,选取两个干预组病房和对照组病房。定义了三个研究组:(A)干预组(由药房助理协助给药);(B)病房内对照组;(C)病房间对照组。主要观察指标是A组与C组中出现不可接受漏服剂量(UOD)的患者数量。次要观察指标是A、B、C组中出现国家患者安全机构定义的严重不可接受漏服剂量(cUOD)的患者数量,以及B组与A组和C组相比的漏服剂量情况。数据收集时间为2周(2011年12月和2012年2月)。

主要发现

使用2周的汇总数据,共评估了778例患者;其中308例为男性(40%)。出现≥1次漏服剂量的患者总体比例为12.4%(n = 96)。A组(干预组)中出现≥1次漏服剂量的患者比例为1.1%(n = 2),C组(对照组)为18.5%(n = 68)。与C组(7.4%;n = 27)相比,A组中出现严重不可接受漏服剂量的患者明显更少(1.1%;n = 2)。

结论

药房助理协助给药查房可显著降低漏服剂量率。本研究为解决住院患者药物漏服问题提供了一种潜在的解决方案。

相似文献

1
Reducing unacceptable missed doses: pharmacy assistant-supported medicine administration.减少不可接受的漏服剂量:药剂师助理支持的药物管理
Int J Pharm Pract. 2015 Oct;23(5):327-32. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12172. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
2
Evaluating the implementation and impact of a pharmacy technician-supported medicines administration service designed to reduce omitted doses in hospitals: a qualitative study.评估一项旨在减少医院漏服剂量的由药剂师技术人员支持的药品给药服务的实施情况和影响:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 22;19(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4146-6.
3
Addressing delays in medication administration for patients transferred from the hospital to the nursing home: a pilot quality improvement project.解决从医院转至养老院患者的用药延迟问题:一项质量改进试点项目。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2008 Oct;6(4):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2008.10.001.
4
Prevalence, nature and predictors of omitted medication doses in mental health hospitals: A multi-centre study.精神卫生医院漏服药物的发生率、性质和预测因素:一项多中心研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 6;15(2):e0228868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228868. eCollection 2020.
5
The impact of implementing a pharmacy technician role as part of a nursing team in an acute admissions unit.在急性入院病房中,作为护理团队的一部分实施药剂师助理角色的影响。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Mar;27(2):114-116. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001685. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
6
A study of the use of medicine lists in medicines reconciliation: please remember this, a list is just a list.一项关于用药清单在药物重整中应用的研究:请记住这一点,清单仅仅只是个清单。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2010 Apr;18(2):116-21.
7
A method for monitoring medication omission error rates.一种监测用药遗漏错误率的方法。
Hosp Pharm. 1982 Jun;17(6):310-2.
8
A prospective cohort study of medication reconciliation using pharmacy technicians in the emergency department to reduce medication errors among admitted patients.一项前瞻性队列研究,利用急诊科药剂师进行用药核对,以减少住院患者的用药错误。
J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;48(2):230-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.09.065. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
9
Implementing an emergency department pharmacy service and its effect on medication safety.实施急诊科药房服务及其对用药安全的影响。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2021 Aug 11;29(4):394-396. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riab012.
10
Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Implementation of Standardized Medication Administration Times for Inpatients Receiving Hemodialysis.评估药师主导的标准化血液透析住院患者给药时间实施情况。
Ann Pharmacother. 2024 Oct;58(10):1027-1033. doi: 10.1177/10600280231220079. Epub 2024 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of collaborative pharmaceutical care on older inpatients' medication safety: multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (MEDREV Study).协作药学服务对老年住院患者用药安全的影响:多中心阶梯楔形整群随机试验(MEDREV研究)
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06122-1.
2
Improving the supply of critical medicines from pharmacy to reduce the delay in medicines administration on wards.从药房改善关键药物的供应,以减少病房给药的延迟。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Jan;11(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001417.
3
Interventions to reduce medication errors in adult medical and surgical settings: a systematic review.
减少成人医疗和外科环境中用药错误的干预措施:一项系统综述。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020 Nov 12;11:2042098620968309. doi: 10.1177/2042098620968309. eCollection 2020.
4
Exploring an extended role for pharmacy assistants on inpatient wards in UK hospitals: using mixed methods to develop the role of medicines assistants.探索英国医院住院病房中药剂师助理的扩展角色:使用混合方法发展药剂助理的角色。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Mar;27(2):78-83. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001518. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
5
Prevalence, nature and predictors of omitted medication doses in mental health hospitals: A multi-centre study.精神卫生医院漏服药物的发生率、性质和预测因素:一项多中心研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 6;15(2):e0228868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228868. eCollection 2020.
6
Stakeholders views of medicines administration by pharmacy technicians on mental health inpatient wards.利益相关者对精神科住院病房药剂师给药的看法。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Oct;41(5):1332-1340. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00880-w. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
7
Prevalence, nature and risk factors for medication administration omissions in English NHS hospital inpatients: a retrospective multicentre study using Medication Safety Thermometer data.英国国民保健署住院患者用药遗漏的发生率、性质和危险因素:使用用药安全温度计数据的回顾性多中心研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 9;9(6):e028170. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028170.
8
Evaluating the implementation and impact of a pharmacy technician-supported medicines administration service designed to reduce omitted doses in hospitals: a qualitative study.评估一项旨在减少医院漏服剂量的由药剂师技术人员支持的药品给药服务的实施情况和影响:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 22;19(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4146-6.
9
A formative evaluation of the implementation of a medication safety data collection tool in English healthcare settings: A qualitative interview study using normalisation process theory.一项关于在英国医疗环境中实施药物安全数据收集工具的形成性评估:一项运用规范化过程理论的定性访谈研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 28;13(2):e0192224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192224. eCollection 2018.
10
Learning from the design, development and implementation of the Medication Safety Thermometer.从用药安全体温计的设计、开发与实施中学习。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Apr 1;29(2):301-309. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw149.