Suppr超能文献

减少成人医疗和外科环境中用药错误的干预措施:一项系统综述。

Interventions to reduce medication errors in adult medical and surgical settings: a systematic review.

作者信息

Manias Elizabeth, Kusljic Snezana, Wu Angela

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.

Department of Nursing, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020 Nov 12;11:2042098620968309. doi: 10.1177/2042098620968309. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Medication errors occur at any point of the medication management process, and are a major cause of death and harm globally. The objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness of different interventions in reducing prescribing, dispensing and administration medication errors in acute medical and surgical settings.

METHODS

The protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019124587). The library databases, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to February 2019. Studies were included if they involved testing of an intervention aimed at reducing medication errors in adult, acute medical or surgical settings. Meta-analyses were performed to examine the effectiveness of intervention types.

RESULTS

A total of 34 articles were included with 12 intervention types identified. Meta-analysis showed that prescribing errors were reduced by pharmacist-led medication reconciliation, computerised medication reconciliation, pharmacist partnership, prescriber education, medication reconciliation by trained mentors and computerised physician order entry (CPOE) as single interventions. Medication administration errors were reduced by CPOE and the use of an automated drug distribution system as single interventions. Combined interventions were also found to be effective in reducing prescribing or administration medication errors. No interventions were found to reduce dispensing error rates. Most studies were conducted at single-site hospitals, with chart review being the most common method for collecting medication error data. Clinical significance of interventions was examined in 21 studies. Since many studies were conducted in a pre-post format, future studies should include a concurrent control group.

CONCLUSION

The systematic review identified a number of single and combined intervention types that were effective in reducing medication errors, which clinicians and policymakers could consider for implementation in medical and surgical settings. New directions for future research should examine interdisciplinary collaborative approaches comprising physicians, pharmacists and nurses.

LAY SUMMARY

.

INTRODUCTION

Medication errors or mistakes may happen at any time in hospital, and they are a major reason for death and harm around the world.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of different activities in reducing medication errors occurring with prescribing, giving and supplying medications in adult medical and surgical settings in hospital.

METHODS

Six library databases were examined from the time they were developed to February 2019. Studies were included if they involved testing of an activity aimed at reducing medication errors in adult medical and surgical settings in hospital. Statistical analysis was used to look at the success of different types of activities.

RESULTS

A total of 34 studies were included with 12 activity types identified. Statistical analysis showed that prescribing errors were reduced by pharmacists matching medications, computers matching medications, partnerships with pharmacists, prescriber education, medication matching by trained physicians, and computerised physician order entry (CPOE). Medication-giving errors were reduced by the use of CPOE and an automated medication distribution system. The combination of different activity types were also shown to be successful in reducing prescribing or medication-giving errors. No activities were found to be successful in reducing errors relating to supplying medications. Most studies were conducted at one hospital with reviewing patient charts being the most common way for collecting information about medication errors. In 21 out of 34 articles, researchers examined the effect of activity types on patient harm caused by medication errors. Many studies did not involve the use of a control group that does not receive the activity.

CONCLUSION

A number of activity types were shown to be successful in reducing prescribing and medication-giving errors. New directions for future research should examine activities comprising health professionals working together.

摘要

背景与目的

用药错误发生在药物管理过程的任何环节,是全球范围内死亡和伤害的主要原因。本综述的目的是比较不同干预措施在减少急性内科和外科环境中处方、调配和给药用药错误方面的有效性。

方法

本系统综述的方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42019124587)注册。检索了MEDLINE、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)、Cochrane系统评价数据库和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库等数据库,检索时间从建库至2019年2月。纳入的研究需涉及针对减少成人急性内科或外科环境中用药错误的干预措施测试。进行荟萃分析以检验不同干预类型的有效性。

结果

共纳入34篇文章,确定了12种干预类型。荟萃分析表明,作为单一干预措施,由药剂师主导的用药核对、计算机化用药核对、药剂师合作、开处方者教育、由经过培训的指导人员进行用药核对以及计算机化医师医嘱录入(CPOE)可减少处方错误。CPOE和使用自动药品分发系统作为单一干预措施可减少给药错误。联合干预措施在减少处方或给药用药错误方面也被证明是有效的。未发现有干预措施可降低调配错误率。大多数研究在单中心医院进行,病历审查是收集用药错误数据最常用的方法。21项研究考察了干预措施的临床意义。由于许多研究采用前后对照设计,未来的研究应纳入同期对照组。

结论

该系统综述确定了一些单一和联合干预类型,这些措施在减少用药错误方面是有效的,临床医生和政策制定者可考虑在医疗和外科环境中实施。未来研究的新方向应考察由医生、药剂师和护士组成的跨学科协作方法。

简要概述

引言

医院中随时可能发生用药错误,这是全球范围内死亡和伤害的主要原因。

目的

比较不同措施在减少医院成人内科和外科环境中处方、给药和供应药物时发生的用药错误方面的有效性。

方法

检索了6个数据库自建库至2019年2月的数据。纳入的研究需涉及针对减少医院成人内科和外科环境中用药错误的措施测试。采用统计分析来考察不同类型措施的成效。

结果

共纳入34项研究,确定了12种措施类型。统计分析表明,药剂师核对药物、计算机核对药物、与药剂师合作、开处方者教育、由经过培训的医生核对药物以及计算机化医师医嘱录入(CPOE)可减少处方错误。使用CPOE和自动药品分发系统可减少给药错误。不同措施类型的联合在减少处方或给药错误方面也被证明是有效的。未发现有措施可成功减少与供应药物相关的错误。大多数研究在一家医院进行,审查患者病历是收集用药错误信息最常用的方式。在34篇文章中的21篇中,研究人员考察了措施类型对用药错误所致患者伤害的影响。许多研究未纳入未接受该措施的对照组。

结论

多种措施类型在减少处方和给药错误方面被证明是有效的。未来研究的新方向应考察由卫生专业人员共同参与的措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ce/7672746/d996fc0f521a/10.1177_2042098620968309-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验