Suppr超能文献

比较立体定向体部放疗与调强放疗治疗局部晚期不可切除胰腺癌患者的疗效。

Comparing outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.

作者信息

Lin Jang-Chun, Jen Yee-Min, Li Ming-Hsien, Chao Hsing-Lung, Tsai Jo-Ting

机构信息

aDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University bDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Mar;27(3):259-64. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000283.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Survival in patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAUPC) is poor, and local recurrence continues to be a major problem in the management of this disease. Radiotherapy (RT) using different RT techniques, including intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), may lead to different clinical outcomes for patients with LAUPC. Here, we compared SBRT with IMRT for patients with LAUPC with respect to survival rate, local control (LC) rate, and toxicity-related dose distribution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study from March 2007 to March 2011 included 41 patients with LAUPC who were divided into two groups, with 20 patients receiving SBRT and 21 patients receiving IMRT. The median follow-up time was 16 months.

RESULTS

For the IMRT and SBRT groups, the median survival times were 13 and 20 months, and 1-year overall survival (OS) rates were 70.7 and 80.0%, respectively. There was no difference in OS between the two RT techniques. RT with SBRT showed significantly better local disease-free survival than IMRT for patients with LAUPC. Tobacco use had a borderline effect on LC. Thus, further statistical analysis showed that patients who used tobacco had better LC after receiving SBRT than IMRT.

CONCLUSION

SBRT improved LC for LAUPC patients and had similar radiation toxicity compared with IMRT. Further study is required to define the effects of administered radiation dose and fractionation, as well as to further expand the sample size, to use a prospective study, and to observe the long-term efficacy of these techniques.

摘要

目的

局部晚期不可切除胰腺癌(LAUPC)患者的生存率较低,局部复发仍是该疾病治疗中的主要问题。使用不同放疗技术,包括调强放疗(IMRT)和立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)进行放疗,可能会给LAUPC患者带来不同的临床结局。在此,我们比较了SBRT与IMRT治疗LAUPC患者的生存率、局部控制(LC)率及毒性相关剂量分布。

材料与方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2007年3月至2011年3月期间的41例LAUPC患者,将其分为两组,20例接受SBRT,21例接受IMRT。中位随访时间为16个月。

结果

IMRT组和SBRT组的中位生存时间分别为13个月和20个月,1年总生存率(OS)分别为70.7%和80.0%。两种放疗技术的OS无差异。对于LAUPC患者,SBRT放疗的局部无病生存率显著优于IMRT。吸烟对LC有临界影响。因此,进一步的统计分析表明,吸烟患者接受SBRT后的LC优于IMRT。

结论

SBRT提高了LAUPC患者的LC,且与IMRT相比具有相似的放射毒性。需要进一步研究以明确所给予的放射剂量和分割的影响,以及进一步扩大样本量、采用前瞻性研究并观察这些技术的长期疗效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验