Gkika E, Adebahr S, Kirste S, Schimek-Jasch T, Wiehle R, Claus R, Wittel U, Nestle U, Baltas D, Grosu A L, Brunner T B
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg (partner site Freiburg), Germany.
Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 Jun;193(6):433-443. doi: 10.1007/s00066-017-1099-8. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in pancreatic cancer can be limited by its proximity to organs at risk (OAR). In this analysis, we evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of two different treatment approaches in patients with locally recurrent or oligometastatic pancreatic cancer.
According to the prescription method, patients were divided in two cohorts (C1 and C2). The planning target volume (PTV) was created through a 4 mm expansion of the internal target volume. In C2, a subvolume was additionally created, a simultaneous integrated protection (SIP), which is the overlap of the PTV with the planning risk volume of an OAR to which we prescribed a reduced dose.
In all, 18 patients were treated (7 with local recurrences, 9 for oligometastases, 2 for both). Twelve of 23 lesions were treated without SIP (C1) and 11 with SIP (C2). The median follow-up was 12.8 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 13.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.8-14.6) months. The OS rates at 6 and 12 months were 87 and 58%, respectively. Freedom from local progression for combined cohorts at 6 and 12 months was 93 and 67% (95% CI 15-36), respectively. Local control was not statistically different between the two groups. One patient in C2 experienced grade ≥3 acute toxicities and 1 patient in C1 experienced a grade ≥3 late toxicity.
The SIP approach is a useful prescription method for abdominal SBRT with a favorable toxicity profile which does not compromise local control and overall survival despite dose sacrifices in small subvolumes.
胰腺癌的立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)可能因其靠近危及器官(OAR)而受到限制。在本分析中,我们评估了两种不同治疗方法对局部复发或寡转移胰腺癌患者的毒性和疗效。
根据处方方法,将患者分为两个队列(C1和C2)。计划靶体积(PTV)通过在内部靶体积外扩4毫米创建。在C2组中,额外创建了一个子体积,即同步整合保护(SIP),它是PTV与我们给予降低剂量的OAR计划风险体积的重叠部分。
总共治疗了18例患者(7例局部复发,9例寡转移,2例两者皆有)。23个病灶中有12个在没有SIP的情况下接受治疗(C1组),11个采用SIP治疗(C2组)。中位随访时间为12.8个月。中位总生存期(OS)为13.2个月(95%置信区间[CI]9.8 - 14.6)。6个月和12个月时的OS率分别为87%和58%。联合队列在6个月和12个月时的无局部进展率分别为93%和67%(95%CI 15 - 36)。两组之间的局部控制无统计学差异。C2组有1例患者发生≥3级急性毒性反应,C1组有1例患者发生≥3级晚期毒性反应。
SIP方法是腹部SBRT的一种有用的处方方法,其毒性特征良好,尽管在小体积子区域剂量有所牺牲,但不影响局部控制和总生存期。