de Geus Susanna W L, Eskander Mariam F, Kasumova Gyulnara G, Ng Sing Chau, Kent Tara S, Mancias Joseph D, Callery Mark P, Mahadevan Anand, Tseng Jennifer F
Surgical Outcomes Analysis and Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cancer. 2017 Nov 1;123(21):4158-4167. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30856. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
The role of conventional radiotherapy in the management of pancreatic cancer has yet to be elucidated. Over the past decade, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a novel therapeutic option in pancreatic cancer care. This study evaluated the survival impact of SBRT on patients with unresected pancreatic cancer.
The National Cancer Data Base was queried for unresected patients who received chemotherapy for nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2012. Four treatment groups were identified: chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy combined with external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT), chemotherapy combined with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and chemotherapy combined with SBRT. Propensity score models predicting the odds of receiving SBRT were created to control for potential selection bias, and patients were matched by propensity scores. The survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method.
A total of 14,331 patients met the inclusion criteria. Chemotherapy alone was delivered to 5464 patients (38.1%); 6418 (44.8%), 322 (2.3%), and 2127 (14.8%) received chemotherapy along with EBRT, IMRT, and SBRT, respectively. The unadjusted median survival before matching was 9.9, 10.9, 12.0, and 13.9 months for patients treated with chemotherapy, EBRT, IMRT, and SBRT, respectively. In separate matched analyses, SBRT remained superior to chemotherapy alone (log-rank P < .0001) and EBRT (log-rank P = .0180). After matching, survival did not differ between patients receiving IMRT and patients receiving SBRT (log-rank P = .0492).
SBRT is associated with a significantly better outcome than chemotherapy alone or in conjunction with traditional EBRT. These results support the idea that SBRT is a promising treatment approach for patients with unresected pancreatic cancer. Cancer 2017;123:4158-4167. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
传统放疗在胰腺癌治疗中的作用尚未阐明。在过去十年中,立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)已成为胰腺癌治疗中的一种新型治疗选择。本研究评估了SBRT对不可切除胰腺癌患者生存的影响。
查询国家癌症数据库中2004年至2012年间接受化疗的非转移性胰腺腺癌不可切除患者。确定了四个治疗组:单纯化疗、化疗联合外照射放疗(EBRT)、化疗联合调强放疗(IMRT)以及化疗联合SBRT。创建预测接受SBRT几率的倾向评分模型以控制潜在的选择偏倚,并根据倾向评分对患者进行匹配。采用Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析。
共有14331例患者符合纳入标准。5464例患者(38.1%)接受单纯化疗;分别有6418例(44.8%)、322例(2.3%)和2127例(14.8%)接受化疗联合EBRT、IMRT和SBRT。匹配前,接受化疗、EBRT、IMRT和SBRT治疗的患者未调整的中位生存期分别为9.9个月、10.9个月、12.0个月和13.9个月。在单独的匹配分析中,SBRT仍然优于单纯化疗(对数秩检验P <.0001)和EBRT(对数秩检验P =.0180)。匹配后接受IMRT的患者与接受SBRT的患者生存率无差异(对数秩检验P =.0492)。
SBRT与单纯化疗或联合传统EBRT相比,结局显著更好。这些结果支持SBRT是不可切除胰腺癌患者一种有前景的治疗方法的观点。《癌症》2017年;123:4158 - 4167。©2017美国癌症协会。