Suppr超能文献

植物-传粉者群落中的相互作用保真度低于预期。

Interaction fidelity is less common than expected in plant-pollinator communities.

机构信息

Institut d'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris (iEES Paris), Sorbonne Université, Paris Cedex 05, France.

Centre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO), CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Anim Ecol. 2022 Sep;91(9):1842-1854. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13762. Epub 2022 Jun 26.

Abstract

Pairs of plants and pollinators species sometimes consistently interact throughout time and across space. Such consistency can be interpreted as a sign of interaction fidelity, that is a consistent interaction between two species when they co-occur in the same place. But how common interaction fidelity is and what determines interaction fidelity in plant-pollinator communities remain open questions. We aim to assess how frequent is interaction fidelity between plants and their pollinators and what drives interaction fidelity across plant-pollinator communities. Using a dataset of 141 networks around the world, we quantify whether the interaction between pairs of plant and pollinator species happens more ('interaction fidelity') or less ('interaction avoidance') often than expected by chance given the structure of the networks in which they co-occur. We also explore the relationship between interaction fidelity and species' degree (i.e. number of interactions), and the taxonomy of the species involved in the interaction. Our findings reveal that most plant-pollinator interactions do not differ from random expectations, in other words show neither fidelity nor avoidance. Out of the total 44,814 co-occurring species pairs we found 7,877 unique pair interactions (18%). Only 551 (7%) of the 7,877 plant-pollinator interactions did show significant interaction fidelity, meaning that these pairs interact in a consistent and non-random way across networks. We also find that 39 (0.09%) out of 44,814 plant-pollinator pairs showed significant interaction avoidance. Our results suggest that interactions involving specialist species have a high probability to show interaction fidelity and a low probability of interaction avoidance. In addition, we find that particular associations between plant and insect orders, as for example interactions between Hymenoptera and Fabales, showed high fidelity and low avoidance. Although niche and neutral processes simultaneously influence patterns of interaction in ecological communities, our findings suggest that it is rather neutral processes that are shaping the patterns of interactions in plant-pollinator networks.

摘要

植物和传粉者物种对有时会在时间和空间上持续相互作用。这种一致性可以解释为相互作用保真度的标志,即在同一地点共同出现时,两种物种之间的一致相互作用。但是,相互作用保真度有多常见,以及植物-传粉者群落中的相互作用保真度是由什么决定的,这些仍然是悬而未决的问题。我们旨在评估植物与其传粉者之间的相互作用保真度有多频繁,以及是什么驱动了植物-传粉者群落中的相互作用保真度。使用来自世界各地的 141 个网络数据集,我们量化了在它们共同出现的网络结构下,植物和传粉者物种对之间的相互作用是更频繁(“相互作用保真度”)还是更不频繁(“相互作用回避”)发生的程度。我们还探讨了相互作用保真度与物种的度(即相互作用的数量)以及参与相互作用的物种的分类之间的关系。我们的研究结果表明,大多数植物-传粉者相互作用与随机预期没有区别,换句话说,既没有保真度也没有回避。在总共 44814 对共同出现的物种对中,我们发现了 7877 个独特的对相互作用(18%)。只有 551(7%)个植物-传粉者相互作用表现出显著的相互作用保真度,这意味着这些对在网络中以一致且非随机的方式相互作用。我们还发现,在 44814 个植物-传粉者对中,有 39 对(0.09%)表现出显著的相互作用回避。我们的研究结果表明,涉及专业物种的相互作用具有高度的相互作用保真度和低的相互作用回避的可能性。此外,我们发现植物和昆虫目之间的特定关联,例如膜翅目和豆目之间的相互作用,具有高度的保真度和低的回避度。尽管生态群落中的相互作用模式同时受到生态位和中性过程的影响,但我们的研究结果表明,中性过程更有可能塑造植物-传粉者网络中相互作用的模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验