Yang Yang, Pu Fang, Lv Xiaoning, Li Shuyu, Li Jing, Li Deyu, Li Minggao, Fan Yubo
International Joint Research Center of Aerospace Biotechnology and Medical Engineering of Ministry of Science and Technology of China, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, No. 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.
International Joint Research Center of Aerospace Biotechnology and Medical Engineering of Ministry of Science and Technology of China, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, No. 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China ; State Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems, Beihang University, No. 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:567690. doi: 10.1155/2015/567690. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) can be used to study the body's response to vestibular stimuli. This study aimed to investigate whether postural responses to GVS were different between pilots and the general populace. Bilateral bipolar GVS was applied with a constant-current profile to 12 pilots and 12 control subjects via two electrodes placed over the mastoid processes. Both GVS threshold and the center of pressure's trajectory (COP's trajectory) were measured. Position variability of COP during spontaneous body sway and peak displacement of COP during GVS-induced body sway were calculated in the medial-lateral direction. Spontaneous body sway was slight for all subjects, and there was no significant difference in the value of COP position variability between the pilots and controls. Both the GVS threshold and magnitude of GVS-induced body deviation were similar for different GVS polarities. GVS thresholds were similar between the two groups, but the magnitude of GVS-induced body deviation in the controls was significantly larger than that in the pilots. The pilots showed less GVS-induced body deviation, meaning that pilots may have a stronger ability to suppress vestibular illusions.
直流电前庭刺激(GVS)可用于研究身体对前庭刺激的反应。本研究旨在调查飞行员和普通人群对GVS的姿势反应是否存在差异。通过放置在乳突上的两个电极,以恒流模式对12名飞行员和12名对照受试者施加双侧双极GVS。测量了GVS阈值和压力中心轨迹(COP轨迹)。计算了自发身体摆动期间COP的位置变异性以及GVS诱发身体摆动期间COP的峰值位移,均在内侧-外侧方向上进行。所有受试者的自发身体摆动都很轻微,飞行员和对照组之间COP位置变异性的值没有显著差异。不同GVS极性下,GVS阈值和GVS诱发的身体偏差幅度相似。两组之间的GVS阈值相似,但对照组中GVS诱发的身体偏差幅度明显大于飞行员。飞行员表现出较小的GVS诱发身体偏差,这意味着飞行员可能具有更强的抑制前庭幻觉的能力。