Guerra Rita S, Fonseca Isabel, Pichel Fernando, Restivo Maria T, Amaral Teresa F
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Jun;115(6):927-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.11.015. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
Undernutrition has been associated with longer length of hospital stay (LOS). However, an analysis that investigates the association of recommended undernutrition diagnostic and screening indicators with LOS conducted in patients with a varied spectrum of pathologies and considering confounders would help to clarify their clinical value.
We aimed to quantify the association of being undernourished as evaluated by different methodologies with LOS and their validity in predicting inpatient LOS.
A prospective observational study was conducted. Undernutrition was evaluated by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics-American Society for Parental and Enteral Nutrition recommended clinical characteristics of malnutrition (AA-CCM) tool, the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002) tool, and the Malnutrition Universal Screening tool (MUST). Handgrip strength (HGS) quartiles by sex and phase angle (PA) categories were also used as indicators of undernutrition.
Six hundred eighty-two inpatients from a Portuguese university hospital participated between 2011 and 2013.
LOS was determined between the date of hospital admission and discharge.
Kaplan-Meier and adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) methods were applied.
Moderate or severe undernutrition by AA-CCM (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.69), by PG-SGA (moderate or suspected: HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.73 and severe: HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.64), risk of undernutrition assessed by NRS-2002 (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.73), by MUST (medium: HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.95 and high: HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.81), HGS quartile (second: HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.80 and first [lowest]: HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.64) and nutritional risk defined by low PA (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.81) were all independently associated with lower probability of being discharged from the hospital.
Despite assessing different dimensions of nutritional status, undernutrition by AA-CCM and PG-SGA, risk of undernutrition assessed by NRS-2002 and MUST, and low HGS and PA independently predict longer LOS in hospitalized patients. All these methodologies share a similar validity in predicting LOS.
营养不良与更长的住院时间(LOS)相关。然而,一项针对不同病理类型患者进行的、考虑了混杂因素的分析,探究推荐的营养不良诊断和筛查指标与住院时间的关联,将有助于阐明其临床价值。
我们旨在量化通过不同方法评估的营养不良与住院时间的关联及其在预测住院患者住院时间方面的有效性。
进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究。通过营养与饮食学会 - 美国肠外与肠内营养学会推荐的营养不良临床特征(AA - CCM)工具、患者主观整体评定法(PG - SGA)、营养风险筛查(NRS - 2002)工具和营养不良通用筛查工具(MUST)来评估营养不良。按性别划分的握力(HGS)四分位数和相位角(PA)类别也用作营养不良的指标。
2011年至2013年间,来自葡萄牙一家大学医院的682名住院患者参与了研究。
住院时间为从入院日期至出院日期的时长。
应用了Kaplan - Meier法和调整后的Cox比例风险比(HR)方法。
AA - CCM评估的中度或重度营养不良(HR 0.58,95%CI 0.49至0.69)、PG - SGA评估的(中度或疑似:HR 0.60,95%CI 0.49至0.73;重度:HR 0.52,95%CI 0.42至0.64)、NRS - 2002评估的营养不良风险(HR 0.61,95%CI 0.52至0.73)、MUST评估的(中度:HR 0.75,95%CI 0.60至0.95;高度:HR 0.67,95%CI 0.55至0.81)、HGS四分位数(第二:HR 0.64,95%CI 0.50至0.80;第一[最低]:HR 0.50,95%CI 0.39至0.64)以及低PA定义的营养风险(HR 0.62,95%CI 0.48至0.81)均与出院可能性降低独立相关。
尽管评估营养状况的维度不同,但AA - CCM和PG - SGA评估的营养不良、NRS - 2002和MUST评估的营养不良风险以及低HGS和低PA均能独立预测住院患者更长的住院时间。所有这些方法在预测住院时间方面具有相似的有效性。