Løkkegaard Thomas, Pedersen Tina Heidi, Lind Bent, Siersma Volkert, Waldorff Frans Boch
The Research Unit for General Practice in Copenhagen, P.O. Box 2099, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dan Med J. 2015 Feb;62(2).
Oral anticoagulation treatment (OACT) with warfarin is common in general practice. Increasingly, international normalised ratio (INR) point of care testing (POCT) is being used to manage patients. The aim of this study was to describe and analyse the quality of OACT with warfarin in general practice in the Capital Region of Denmark using INR POCT.
A total of 20 general practices, ten single-handed and ten group practices using INR POCT, were randomly selected to participate in the study. Practice organisation and patient characteristics were recorded. INR measurements were collected retrospectively for a period of six months. For each patient, time in therapeutic range (TTR) was calculated and correlated with practice and patient characteristics using multilevel linear regression models.
We identified 447 patients in warfarin treatment in the 20 practices using POCT (median = 19 patients; range: 6-55). The mean TTR for all patients was 69.3% (standard deviation (SD) = 24%), and for all practices the mean TTR was 67.3% (SD = 6.7%). The TTR in single-handed practices was lower than in group practices, 64.6% (SD = 8.0%) and 70.0% (SD = 3.6%), respectively; but the difference was not significant (4.2 percentage points (pp); 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.8-9.2). Short sampling intervals, e.g. 10-20 days (-11 pp; 95% CI: -16-6)) and lack of diagnostic coding (-11.8 pp; 95% CI: -19.9-3.7) were correlated with a low TTR.
In our study most of the general practices using INR POCT in the management of patients in warfarin treatment provided good quality of care. Sampling interval and diagnostic coding were significantly correlated with treatment quality.
在全科医疗中,使用华法林进行口服抗凝治疗(OACT)很常见。国际标准化比值(INR)即时检验(POCT)越来越多地用于管理患者。本研究的目的是描述和分析丹麦首都地区全科医疗中使用INR POCT进行华法林OACT的质量。
随机选择20家使用INR POCT的全科诊所,其中10家单人诊所和10家联合诊所参与研究。记录诊所组织情况和患者特征。回顾性收集六个月期间的INR测量值。对于每位患者,计算治疗范围内时间(TTR),并使用多水平线性回归模型将其与诊所及患者特征相关联。
我们在使用POCT的20家诊所中确定了447例接受华法林治疗的患者(中位数=19例;范围:6 - 55例)。所有患者的平均TTR为69.3%(标准差(SD)=24%),所有诊所的平均TTR为67.3%(SD = 6.7%)。单人诊所的TTR低于联合诊所,分别为64.6%(SD = 8.0%)和70.0%(SD = 3.6%);但差异不显著(4.2个百分点(pp);95%置信区间(CI):-0.8 - 9.2)。较短的采样间隔,例如10 - 20天(-11 pp;95% CI:-16 - 6))和缺乏诊断编码(-11.8 pp;95% CI:-19.9 -