• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随着联邦合格医疗中心可及性的提高,癌症死亡率与发病率之比降低。

Decreased Cancer Mortality-to-Incidence Ratios with Increased Accessibility of Federally Qualified Health Centers.

作者信息

Adams Swann Arp, Choi Seul Ki, Khang Leepao, A Campbell Dayna, Friedman Daniela B, Eberth Jan M, Glasgow Russell E, Tucker-Seeley Reginald, Xirasagar Sudha, Yip Mei Po, Young Vicki M, Hébert James R

机构信息

Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA,

出版信息

J Community Health. 2015 Aug;40(4):633-41. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9978-8.

DOI:10.1007/s10900-014-9978-8
PMID:25634545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4490935/
Abstract

Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) offer primary and preventive healthcare, including cancer screening, for the nation's most vulnerable population. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between access to FQHCs and cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs). One-way analysis of variance was conducted to compare the mean MIRs for breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal cancers for each U.S. county for 2006-2010 by access to FQHCs (direct access, in-county FQHC; indirect access, adjacent-county FQHC; no access, no FQHC either in the county or in adjacent counties). ArcMap 10.1 software was used to map cancer MIRs and FQHC access levels. The mean MIRs for breast, cervical, and prostate cancer differed significantly across FQHC access levels (p < 0.05). In urban and healthcare professional shortage areas, mean MIRs decreased as FQHC access increased. A trend of lower breast and prostate cancer MIRs in direct access to FQHCs was found for all racial groups, but this trend was significant for whites only. States with a large proportion of rural and medically underserved areas had high mean MIRs, with correspondingly more direct FQHC access. Expanding FQHCs to more underserved areas and concentrations of disparity populations may have an important role in reducing cancer morbidity and mortality, as well as racial-ethnic disparities, in the United States.

摘要

联邦合格医疗中心(FQHCs)为美国最脆弱的人群提供初级和预防性医疗服务,包括癌症筛查。本研究的目的是探讨获得FQHCs服务与癌症死亡率与发病率之比(MIRs)之间的关系。通过获得FQHCs服务的情况(直接获得,所在县的FQHC;间接获得,相邻县的FQHC;无获得,所在县及相邻县均无FQHC),对2006 - 2010年美国各县乳腺癌、宫颈癌、前列腺癌和结直肠癌的平均MIRs进行单因素方差分析。使用ArcMap 10.1软件绘制癌症MIRs和FQHCs获得水平的地图。乳腺癌、宫颈癌和前列腺癌的平均MIRs在不同的FQHCs获得水平上存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。在城市和医疗专业人员短缺地区,随着获得FQHCs服务的增加,平均MIRs下降。所有种族群体在直接获得FQHCs服务时,乳腺癌和前列腺癌的MIRs均有降低趋势,但仅白人的这一趋势具有显著性。农村和医疗服务不足地区比例较大的州,平均MIRs较高,相应地直接获得FQHCs服务的情况也更多。在美国,将FQHCs扩展到更多医疗服务不足地区和差异人群集中的地区,可能在降低癌症发病率和死亡率以及种族差异方面发挥重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a149/4490935/0ca82a8906d4/nihms-659860-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a149/4490935/0ca82a8906d4/nihms-659860-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a149/4490935/0ca82a8906d4/nihms-659860-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Decreased Cancer Mortality-to-Incidence Ratios with Increased Accessibility of Federally Qualified Health Centers.随着联邦合格医疗中心可及性的提高,癌症死亡率与发病率之比降低。
J Community Health. 2015 Aug;40(4):633-41. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9978-8.
2
Is Availability of Mammography Services at Federally Qualified Health Centers Associated with Breast Cancer Mortality-to-Incidence Ratios? An Ecological Analysis.联邦合格健康中心的乳房X光检查服务可及性与乳腺癌死亡率与发病率之比相关吗?一项生态分析。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Nov;24(11):916-23. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5114. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
3
Spatial availability of federally qualified health centers and disparities in health services utilization in medically underserved areas.合格联邦健康中心的空间可达性与医疗服务匮乏地区健康服务利用之间的差异。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jul;328:116009. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116009. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
4
Access points for the underserved: primary care appointment availability at federally qualified health centers in 10 States.为服务不足人群提供的接入点:10个州联邦合格健康中心的初级保健预约服务可及性
Med Care. 2014 Sep;52(9):818-25. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000184.
5
National Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Use in Federally Qualified Health Centers.全国乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查在联邦合格健康中心的应用。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Jun 1;184(6):671-679. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0693.
6
Access to Federally Qualified Health Centers and Emergency Department Use Among Uninsured and Medicaid-insured Adults: California, 2005 to 2013.联邦合格健康中心的利用和未参保与参保医疗补助成年人的急诊使用:加利福尼亚州,2005 至 2013 年。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;26(2):129-139. doi: 10.1111/acem.13494. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
7
Medicaid Coverage Expansion and Implications for Cancer Disparities.医疗补助覆盖范围扩大及其对癌症差异的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S706-12. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302876. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
8
Cervical cancer screening behaviors and proximity to federally qualified health centers in South Carolina.南卡罗来纳州宫颈癌筛查行为与联邦合格健康中心的接近程度。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Apr;65:101681. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101681. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
9
Safety Net Primary Care Capabilities After the COVID-19 Pandemic.大流行后安全网初级保健能力
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Aug 2;5(8):e242547. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2547.
10
Federally qualified health centers reduce the primary care provider gap in health professional shortage counties.合格的联邦健康中心减少了卫生专业短缺县的初级保健服务提供者的差距。
Nurs Outlook. 2018 May-Jun;66(3):263-272. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Access to head and neck cancer specialists: a geospatial analysis of U.S. travel time.头颈癌专科医生的可及性:美国旅行时间的地理空间分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 31;15:1521370. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1521370. eCollection 2025.
2
Incidence, mortality, and risk factors of bladder, kidney, prostate and testicular cancers in China and comparisons with the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and the Republic of Korea: an up-to-date overview based on the Global Burden of Disease 2021.中国膀胱癌、肾癌、前列腺癌和睾丸癌的发病率、死亡率及危险因素,以及与美国、英国、日本和韩国的比较:基于《2021年全球疾病负担》的最新综述
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2025 Aug 6;14(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40164-025-00694-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2014.癌症统计数据,2014 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jan-Feb;64(1):9-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21208. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
2
Cancer statistics for Hispanics/Latinos, 2012.2012 年西班牙裔/拉丁裔癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Sep-Oct;62(5):283-98. doi: 10.3322/caac.21153.
3
Age-specific trends in black-white disparities in cervical cancer incidence in the United States: 1975-2009.美国宫颈癌发病率的黑-白差异在年龄特异性趋势:1975-2009 年。
The use of blastocysts developing from nonpronuclear and monopronuclear zygotes can be considered in PGT-SR: a retrospective cohort study.
在植入前基因检测-结构重排(PGT-SR)中可考虑使用由非原核和单原核合子发育而来的囊胚:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 3;25(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07621-0.
4
A comparative analysis of global and Chinese trends in the burden of kidney cancer from 1990 to 2021.1990年至2021年全球及中国肾癌负担趋势的比较分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 7;15(1):4558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88682-1.
5
Reflecting on partnerships established and sustained over four cycles of a federally funded cancer prevention and control research program: lessons learned for community-academic networks.回顾在一个由联邦资助的癌症预防与控制研究项目的四个周期中建立并维持的伙伴关系:社区-学术网络的经验教训
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;12:1384588. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1384588. eCollection 2024.
6
Disparities in Cancer Stage of Diagnosis by Rurality in California, 2015 to 2019.2015年至2019年加利福尼亚州农村地区癌症诊断阶段的差异
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Nov 1;33(11):1523-1531. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0564.
7
Community Care for Cancer Patients in Rural Areas: An Integrated Regional Cancer Center and Public Health Center Partnership Model.农村地区癌症患者的社区护理:区域癌症中心与公共卫生中心的综合合作模式。
J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Dec 1;24(4):226-234. doi: 10.14475/jhpc.2021.24.4.226.
8
Gender differences in leukemia outcomes based on health care expenditures using estimates from the GLOBOCAN 2020.基于2020年全球癌症负担估计数据,白血病治疗结果中的性别差异与医疗保健支出的关系。
Arch Public Health. 2023 Aug 21;81(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01154-8.
9
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hospital-Based Care Among Dual Eligibles Who Use Health Centers.使用健康中心的双重资格者在医院护理方面的种族和族裔差异。
Health Equity. 2023 Jan 13;7(1):9-18. doi: 10.1089/heq.2022.0037. eCollection 2023.
10
Updated epidemiology of gastrointestinal cancers in East Asia.东亚地区胃肠道癌症的最新流行病学情况。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 May;20(5):271-287. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00726-3. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Dec;127(3):611-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.021. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
4
Improved overall survival trends of men with newly diagnosed M1 prostate cancer: a SWOG phase III trial experience (S8494, S8894 and S9346).新诊断为 M1 期前列腺癌男性的总体生存趋势改善:SWOG 三期试验经验(S8494、S8894 和 S9346)。
J Urol. 2012 Oct;188(4):1164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.06.046. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
5
Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17;157(2):120-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459.
6
Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.筛查软性乙状结肠镜检查对结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 21;366(25):2345-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114635. Epub 2012 May 21.
7
American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.美国癌症协会、美国阴道镜和宫颈病理学会以及美国临床病理学会宫颈癌预防和早期检测筛查指南。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 May-Jun;62(3):147-72. doi: 10.3322/caac.21139. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
8
Cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios in Georgia: describing racial cancer disparities and potential geographic determinants.佐治亚州的癌症死亡率与发病率之比:描述种族癌症差异和潜在的地理决定因素。
Cancer. 2012 Aug 15;118(16):4032-45. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26728. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
9
Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades.瑞典两县试验:30 年来乳腺 X 线筛查对乳腺癌死亡率的影响。
Radiology. 2011 Sep;260(3):658-63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110469. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
10
Cancer statistics, 2010.癌症统计数据,2010 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.