• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用暴露边际法对酒精、烟草、大麻及其他非法药物进行比较风险评估。

Comparative risk assessment of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis and other illicit drugs using the margin of exposure approach.

作者信息

Lachenmeier Dirk W, Rehm Jürgen

机构信息

1] Epidemiological Research Unit, Technische Universität Dresden, Klinische Psychologie &Psychotherapie, Dresden, Germany [2] Chemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt (CVUA) Karlsruhe, Germany.

1] Epidemiological Research Unit, Technische Universität Dresden, Klinische Psychologie &Psychotherapie, Dresden, Germany [2] Social and Epidemiological Research (SER) Department, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada [3] Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto (UofT), Toronto, Canada [4] Dalla Lana School of Public Health, UofT, Toronto, Canada [5] Dept. of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, UofT, Toronto, Canada [6] PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health &Addiction, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2015 Jan 30;5:8126. doi: 10.1038/srep08126.

DOI:10.1038/srep08126
PMID:25634572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4311234/
Abstract

A comparative risk assessment of drugs including alcohol and tobacco using the margin of exposure (MOE) approach was conducted. The MOE is defined as ratio between toxicological threshold (benchmark dose) and estimated human intake. Median lethal dose values from animal experiments were used to derive the benchmark dose. The human intake was calculated for individual scenarios and population-based scenarios. The MOE was calculated using probabilistic Monte Carlo simulations. The benchmark dose values ranged from 2 mg/kg bodyweight for heroin to 531 mg/kg bodyweight for alcohol (ethanol). For individual exposure the four substances alcohol, nicotine, cocaine and heroin fall into the "high risk" category with MOE < 10, the rest of the compounds except THC fall into the "risk" category with MOE < 100. On a population scale, only alcohol would fall into the "high risk" category, and cigarette smoking would fall into the "risk" category, while all other agents (opiates, cocaine, amphetamine-type stimulants, ecstasy, and benzodiazepines) had MOEs > 100, and cannabis had a MOE > 10,000. The toxicological MOE approach validates epidemiological and social science-based drug ranking approaches especially in regard to the positions of alcohol and tobacco (high risk) and cannabis (low risk).

摘要

采用暴露边际(MOE)方法对包括酒精和烟草在内的药物进行了比较风险评估。MOE定义为毒理学阈值(基准剂量)与估计的人体摄入量之比。动物实验的半数致死剂量值用于推导基准剂量。针对个体情况和基于人群的情况计算人体摄入量。使用概率蒙特卡洛模拟计算MOE。基准剂量值范围从海洛因的2毫克/千克体重到酒精(乙醇)的531毫克/千克体重。对于个体暴露,酒精、尼古丁、可卡因和海洛因这四种物质属于“高风险”类别,MOE<10,除四氢大麻酚外的其他化合物属于“风险”类别,MOE<100。在人群层面,只有酒精属于“高风险”类别,吸烟属于“风险”类别,而所有其他药物(阿片类药物、可卡因、苯丙胺类兴奋剂、摇头丸和苯二氮䓬类药物)的MOE>100,大麻的MOE>10000。毒理学MOE方法验证了基于流行病学和社会科学的药物排名方法,特别是在酒精和烟草(高风险)以及大麻(低风险)的排名位置方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ea/4311234/85accc2d66ef/srep08126-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ea/4311234/253fd3386dfc/srep08126-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ea/4311234/2ceef89604bf/srep08126-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ea/4311234/85accc2d66ef/srep08126-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ea/4311234/253fd3386dfc/srep08126-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ea/4311234/2ceef89604bf/srep08126-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ea/4311234/85accc2d66ef/srep08126-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative risk assessment of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis and other illicit drugs using the margin of exposure approach.采用暴露边际法对酒精、烟草、大麻及其他非法药物进行比较风险评估。
Sci Rep. 2015 Jan 30;5:8126. doi: 10.1038/srep08126.
2
Comparative risk assessment of tobacco smoke constituents using the margin of exposure approach: the neglected contribution of nicotine.利用暴露边际评估法对烟草烟雾成分进行比较风险评估:被忽视的尼古丁贡献。
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 19;6:35577. doi: 10.1038/srep35577.
3
Monitoring of changes in illicit drugs, alcohol, and nicotine consumption during Ramadan via wastewater analysis.通过污水分析监测斋月期间非法药物、酒精和尼古丁消费的变化。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(59):89245-89254. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22016-w. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
4
Neural correlates of the severity of cocaine, heroin, alcohol, MDMA and cannabis use in polysubstance abusers: a resting-PET brain metabolism study.多药物滥用者中可卡因、海洛因、酒精、MDMA 和大麻使用严重程度的神经相关因素:一项静息-PET 脑代谢研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039830. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
5
European rating of drug harms.欧洲药品危害评级。
J Psychopharmacol. 2015 Jun;29(6):655-60. doi: 10.1177/0269881115581980. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
6
Patterns of polysubstance use and clinical comorbidity among persons seeking substance use treatment: An observational study.寻求药物滥用治疗者的多物质使用模式和临床合并症:一项观察性研究。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023 Mar;146:208932. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2022.208932. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
7
Assessing the impact of a major electronic music festival on the consumption patterns of illicit and licit psychoactive substances in a Mediterranean city using wastewater analysis.利用废水分析评估一场大型电子音乐节对地中海城市非法和合法精神活性物质消费模式的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Sep 20;892:164547. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164547. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
8
Does perception of drug-related harm change with age? A cross-sectional online survey of young and older people.药物相关危害的认知是否会随年龄而变化?一项对年轻人和老年人进行的横断面在线调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 6;8(11):e021109. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021109.
9
Psychoactive substances and violent offences: A retrospective analysis of presentations to an urban emergency department in Switzerland.精神活性物质与暴力犯罪:瑞士某城市急诊部门就诊病例的回顾性分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 29;13(3):e0195234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195234. eCollection 2018.
10
Electronic cigarettes: overview of chemical composition and exposure estimation.电子烟:化学成分概述与暴露评估
Tob Induc Dis. 2014 Dec 9;12(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12971-014-0023-6. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of cannabis warnings and recommendations for improvement: a qualitative study with people who use cannabis from the United States.对大麻警示的认知及改进建议:一项针对美国大麻使用者的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):2363. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23518-1.
2
Cannabis Policies, Cannabis, and Opioids in Suicide and Undetermined Intent Death.大麻政策、大麻与自杀及意图不明死亡中的阿片类药物
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Mar;68(3):475-484. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.009. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
3
Regulatory Landscape of Cannabis Warning Labels in US States with Legal Retail Nonmedical Cannabis, 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Dose-concentration relationships of methadone and EDDP in hair of patients on a methadone-maintenance program.美沙酮维持治疗项目患者头发中美沙酮和去甲美沙酮的剂量-浓度关系。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2005 Jun;1(2):97-103. doi: 10.1385/FSMP:1:2:097.
2
Why does society accept a higher risk for alcohol than for other voluntary or involuntary risks?为什么社会对酒精接受的风险高于对其他自愿或非自愿风险的接受程度?
BMC Med. 2014 Oct 21;12:189. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0189-z.
3
Recent increases in efficiency in cigarette nicotine delivery: implications for tobacco control.
2024 年美国有合法零售非医用大麻的州的大麻警告标签监管格局。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Nov;114(S8):S681-S684. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307722.
4
Characteristics of blunt and penetrating trauma among victims of physical violence: A retrospective study.身体暴力受害者钝器伤和穿透伤的特征:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 31;24(1):2073. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18978-w.
5
Perinatal Tetrahydrocannabinol Compromises Maternal Care and Increases Litter Attrition in the Long-Evans Rat.围产期四氢大麻酚损害母性行为并增加长 Evans 大鼠的窝仔损耗。
Toxics. 2024 Apr 26;12(5):311. doi: 10.3390/toxics12050311.
6
Cannabis use and cannabis use disorders and their treatment in the Europe.欧洲的大麻使用、大麻使用障碍及其治疗
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Mar;275(2):307-313. doi: 10.1007/s00406-024-01776-1. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
7
Why are the police against drug policy liberalisation?为什么警方反对毒品政策自由化?
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2023 Dec;40(6):568-576. doi: 10.1177/14550725231185417. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
8
Perigestational Opioid Exposure Alters Alcohol-Driven Reward Behaviors in Adolescent Rats.围产期阿片类物质暴露改变青春期大鼠酒精驱动的奖赏行为。
bioRxiv. 2023 Nov 16:2023.11.14.567041. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.14.567041.
9
Monitoring arsenic species concentration in rice-based processed products distributed in South Korean markets and related risk assessment.监测韩国市场上大米加工产品中的砷形态浓度及相关风险评估。
Food Sci Biotechnol. 2023 Mar 7;32(10):1361-1372. doi: 10.1007/s10068-023-01270-9. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Associations between the use of psychedelics and other recreational drugs with mental health and resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,使用迷幻剂及其他消遣性药物与心理健康和恢复力之间的关联。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 15;14:1184681. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1184681. eCollection 2023.
近期卷烟尼古丁递送效率的提高:对烟草控制的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Jun;16(6):753-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt219. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
4
How much nicotine kills a human? Tracing back the generally accepted lethal dose to dubious self-experiments in the nineteenth century.多少尼古丁会致人死亡?将普遍认可的致死剂量追溯到19世纪可疑的人体实验。
Arch Toxicol. 2014 Jan;88(1):5-7. doi: 10.1007/s00204-013-1127-0. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
5
Can resveratrol in wine protect against the carcinogenicity of ethanol? A probabilistic dose-response assessment.葡萄酒中的白藜芦醇能预防乙醇的致癌性吗?概率剂量反应评估。
Int J Cancer. 2014 Jan 1;134(1):144-53. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28336. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
6
Harms and benefits associated with psychoactive drugs: findings of an international survey of active drug users.与精神活性药物相关的危害和益处:一项国际活跃药物使用者调查的结果。
J Psychopharmacol. 2013 Jun;27(6):497-506. doi: 10.1177/0269881113477744. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
7
Comparing illicit drug use in 19 European cities through sewage analysis.通过污水分析比较 19 个欧洲城市的非法药物使用情况。
Sci Total Environ. 2012 Aug 15;432:432-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.069. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
8
Comparative risk assessment of carcinogens in alcoholic beverages using the margin of exposure approach.利用暴露边际评估法对酒精饮料中的致癌物质进行比较风险评估。
Int J Cancer. 2012 Sep 15;131(6):E995-1003. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27553. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
9
A probabilistic risk assessment approach used to prioritize chemical constituents in mainstream smoke of cigarettes sold in China.用于对中国销售的香烟主流烟雾中化学物质成分进行优先级排序的概率风险评估方法。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012 Mar;62(2):355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.10.017. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
10
Can harm ratings be useful?危害评级会有用吗?
Addiction. 2011 Nov;106(11):1893-4; discussion 1896-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03535.x. Epub 2011 Sep 6.