Suppr超能文献

影响不同类型阿尔茨海默病风险个人遗传信息回忆的因素:REVEAL研究

Factors affecting recall of different types of personal genetic information about Alzheimer's disease risk: the REVEAL study.

作者信息

Besser Andria G, Sanderson Saskia C, Roberts J Scott, Chen Clara A, Christensen Kurt D, Lautenbach Denise M, Cupples L Adrienne, Green Robert C

机构信息

Bonei Olam Center for Rare Jewish Genetic Disorders, Brooklyn, N.Y., USA.

出版信息

Public Health Genomics. 2015;18(2):78-86. doi: 10.1159/000368888. Epub 2015 Jan 24.

Abstract

METHODS

Data were obtained through a multisite clinical trial in which different types of genetic risk-related information were disclosed to individuals (n = 246) seeking a risk assessment for Alzheimer's disease.

RESULTS

Six weeks after disclosure, 83% of participants correctly recalled the number of risk-increasing APOE alleles they possessed, and 74% correctly recalled their APOE genotype. While 84% of participants recalled their lifetime risk estimate to within 5 percentage points, only 51% correctly recalled their lifetime risk estimate exactly. Correct recall of the number of APOE risk-increasing alleles was independently associated with higher education (p < 0.001), greater numeracy (p < 0.05) and stronger family history of Alzheimer's disease (p < 0.05). Before adjustments for confounding, correct recall of APOE genotype was also associated with higher education, greater numeracy and stronger family history of Alzheimer's disease, as well as with higher comfort with numbers and European American ethnicity (all p < 0.05). Correct recall of the lifetime risk estimate was independently associated only with younger age (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Recall of genotype-specific information is high, but recall of exact risk estimates is lower. Incorrect recall of numeric risk may lead to distortions in understanding risk. Further research is needed to determine how best to communicate different types of genetic risk information to patients, particularly to those with lower educational levels and lower numeracy. Health-care professionals should be aware that each type of genetic risk information may be differentially interpreted and retained by patients and that some patient subgroups may have more problems with recall than others.

摘要

方法

数据通过一项多中心临床试验获得,在该试验中,向寻求阿尔茨海默病风险评估的个体(n = 246)披露了不同类型的遗传风险相关信息。

结果

披露信息六周后,83%的参与者正确回忆起他们拥有的增加风险的APOE等位基因数量,74%的参与者正确回忆起他们的APOE基因型。虽然84%的参与者回忆起他们的终生风险估计在5个百分点以内,但只有51%的参与者准确地正确回忆起他们的终生风险估计。正确回忆增加风险的APOE等位基因数量与高等教育程度(p < 0.001)、较高的计算能力(p < 0.05)和较强的阿尔茨海默病家族史(p < 0.05)独立相关。在对混杂因素进行调整之前,正确回忆APOE基因型还与高等教育程度、较高的计算能力、较强的阿尔茨海默病家族史以及对数字的较高舒适度和欧美种族相关(所有p < 0.05)。正确回忆终生风险估计仅与较年轻的年龄独立相关(p < 0.05)。

结论

对基因型特异性信息的回忆率较高,但对确切风险估计的回忆率较低。对数字风险的错误回忆可能导致对风险理解的扭曲。需要进一步研究以确定如何最好地向患者传达不同类型的遗传风险信息,特别是向教育水平较低和计算能力较低的患者。医疗保健专业人员应意识到,每种类型的遗传风险信息可能会被患者以不同方式解释和记住,并且一些患者亚组在回忆方面可能比其他亚组有更多问题。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Communicating the risk of dementia: a scoping review.痴呆症风险的沟通:一项范围综述
BMJ Neurol Open. 2025 Jul 22;7(2):e001138. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2025-001138. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验