Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Woodruff Health Science Center Library, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Apr 26;11(4):901-911. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa076.
Since the completion of the Human Genome Project, progress toward translating genomic research discoveries to address population health issues has been limited. Several meetings of social and behavioral scientists have outlined priority research areas where advancement of translational research could increase population health benefits of genomic discoveries. In this review, we track the pace of progress, study size and design, and focus of genomics translational research from 2012 to 2018 and its concordance with five social and behavioral science recommended priorities. We conducted a review of the literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Guidelines for Scoping Reviews. Steps involved completing a search in five databases and a hand search of bibliographies of relevant literature. Our search (from 2012 to 2018) yielded 4,538 unique studies; 117 were included in the final analyses. Two coders extracted data including items from the PICOTS framework. Analysis included descriptive statistics to help identify trends in pace, study size and design, and translational priority area. Among the 117 studies included in our final sample, nearly half focused on genomics applications that have evidence to support translation or implementation into practice (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Tier 1 applications). Common study designs were cross-sectional (40.2%) and qualitative (24.8%), with average sample sizes of 716 across all studies. Most often, studies addressed public understanding of genetics and genomics (33.3%), risk communication (29.1%), and intervention development and testing of interventions to promote behavior change (19.7%). The number of studies that address social and behavioral science priority areas is extremely limited and the pace of this research continues to lag behind basic science advances. Much of the research identified in this review is descriptive and related to public understanding, risk communication, and intervention development and testing of interventions to promote behavior change. The field has been slow to develop and evaluate public health-friendly interventions and test implementation approaches that could enable health benefits and equitable access to genomic discoveries. As the completion of the human genome approaches its 20th anniversary, full engagement of transdisciplinary efforts to address translation challenges will be required to close this gap.
自人类基因组计划完成以来,将基因组研究发现转化为解决人口健康问题的工作进展一直受到限制。一些社会和行为科学家的会议已经确定了优先研究领域,在这些领域推进转化研究可以增加基因组发现对人口健康的益处。在这篇综述中,我们跟踪了从 2012 年到 2018 年的基因组学转化研究的进展速度、研究规模和设计以及重点,并将其与社会和行为科学推荐的五个优先事项进行了一致性比较。我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南进行了文献综述,用于范围综述。步骤包括在五个数据库中进行搜索,并对相关文献的参考文献进行手工搜索。我们的搜索(从 2012 年到 2018 年)产生了 4538 项独特的研究;最终分析包括 117 项研究。两名编码员提取了包括 PICOTS 框架项目在内的数据。分析包括描述性统计,以帮助确定进展速度、研究规模和设计以及转化优先领域的趋势。在我们最终样本中包括的 117 项研究中,近一半的研究侧重于具有转化或实施到实践证据的基因组学应用(疾病控制和预防中心 1 级应用)。常见的研究设计是横断面(40.2%)和定性(24.8%),所有研究的平均样本量为 716。大多数研究涉及公众对遗传学和基因组学的理解(33.3%)、风险沟通(29.1%)以及干预措施的制定和测试以促进行为改变的干预措施(19.7%)。针对社会和行为科学优先领域的研究数量极其有限,而且该研究的进展速度继续落后于基础科学的进步。本综述中确定的大部分研究都是描述性的,与公众的理解、风险沟通以及干预措施的制定和测试以促进行为改变的干预措施有关。该领域一直难以开发和评估有利于公共卫生的干预措施,并测试能够实现健康益处和公平获得基因组发现的实施方法。随着人类基因组计划完成即将迎来 20 周年,为了缩小这一差距,需要充分参与跨学科努力来应对转化挑战。