• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲状腺乳头状癌的机器人甲状腺手术:连续100例手术的经验教训

Robotic thyroid surgery for papillary thyroid carcinoma: lessons learned from 100 consecutive surgeries.

作者信息

Lee Hye Yoon, Yang In Soo, Hwang Seong Bae, Lee Jae Bok, Bae Jeoung Won, Kim Hoon Yub

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Feb;25(1):27-32. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182a2b0ae.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182a2b0ae
PMID:25635671
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of robotic thyroidectomy using the da Vinci surgical system.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between July 2008 and April 2011, the data revealed an initial series of 100 consecutive patients who underwent robotic thyroidectomy with the da Vinci-S surgical system using the bilateral axillo-breast approach for thyroid cancer. Prospectively collected data were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

There were 88 cases of total thyroidectomy, 11 cases of lobectomy, and 1 case of total thyroidectomy with modified radical neck dissection. There was no conversion. The mean total operation time was 287.15±45.19 minutes for total thyroidectomy and 236.27±48.98 minutes for lobectomy. Nineteen patients experienced transient hypocalcemia and 3 patients experienced transient vocal fold palsy. All of the patients recovered within 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic thyroid surgery for patients with thyroid malignancy is safe and results in fewer postoperative complications than open thyroid surgery.

摘要

目的

评估使用达芬奇手术系统进行机器人甲状腺切除术的可行性和安全性。

患者与方法

在2008年7月至2011年4月期间,数据显示最初有100例连续患者使用达芬奇-S手术系统通过双侧腋窝-乳房入路接受机器人甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺癌。对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析。

结果

全甲状腺切除术88例,甲状腺叶切除术11例,全甲状腺切除术加改良根治性颈清扫术1例。无中转开腹手术。全甲状腺切除术的平均总手术时间为287.15±45.19分钟,甲状腺叶切除术为236.27±48.98分钟。19例患者出现短暂性低钙血症,3例患者出现短暂性声带麻痹。所有患者均在3个月内康复。

结论

对于甲状腺恶性肿瘤患者,机器人甲状腺手术是安全的,且术后并发症比开放性甲状腺手术少。

相似文献

1
Robotic thyroid surgery for papillary thyroid carcinoma: lessons learned from 100 consecutive surgeries.甲状腺乳头状癌的机器人甲状腺手术:连续100例手术的经验教训
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Feb;25(1):27-32. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182a2b0ae.
2
[Robotic thyroidectomy with central neck dissection using axillo-bilateral-breast approach: a comparison to open conventional approach].[经腋窝双侧乳房入路机器人甲状腺切除术并中央区淋巴结清扫:与开放传统入路的比较]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jan 1;54(1):51-5. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2016.01.013.
3
Robotic-assisted breast-axillo insufflation thyroidectomy (RABIT): a retrospective case series of thyroid carcinoma.机器人辅助乳房-腋窝充气甲状腺切除术(RABIT):甲状腺癌的回顾性病例系列研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar;25(3):439-445. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01568-x. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
4
Robotic total thyroidectomy with modified radical neck dissection via unilateral retroauricular approach.经单侧耳后入路机器人辅助全甲状腺切除术并改良根治性颈清扫术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;21(12):3872-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3896-y. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
5
Propensity score-matched analysis of robotic versus endoscopic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma.乳头状甲状腺癌中机器人辅助与内镜双侧腋窝-乳房入路(BABA)甲状腺切除术的倾向评分匹配分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Mar;402(2):243-250. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1528-7. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
6
Robotic thyroid surgery using bilateral axillo-breast approach: personal initial experience over two years.采用双侧腋窝-乳房入路的机器人甲状腺手术:个人两年的初步经验
Minerva Chir. 2012 Feb;67(1):39-48.
7
Robotic modified radical neck dissection by bilateral axillary breast approach for papillary thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck metastasis.经双侧腋窝入路机器人改良根治性颈淋巴结清扫术治疗伴侧颈转移的乳头状甲状腺癌。
Head Neck. 2015 Jan;37(1):37-45. doi: 10.1002/hed.23545. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
8
Central neck dissection using a bilateral axillo-breast approach for robotic thyroidectomy: comparison with conventional open procedure after propensity score matching.采用双侧腋窝-乳房入路的机器人甲状腺手术中央区颈淋巴结清扫术:倾向评分匹配后与传统开放手术的比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Feb;24(1):67-72. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182a4bfec.
9
Robot-assisted Sistrunk's operation, total thyroidectomy, and neck dissection via a transaxillary and retroauricular (TARA) approach in papillary carcinoma arising in thyroglossal duct cyst and thyroid gland.经腋后(TARA)入路机器人辅助施行 Sistrunk 手术、甲状腺全切除术和颈淋巴结清扫术治疗甲状舌管囊肿和甲状腺起源的乳头状癌
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4259-61. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2674-y. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
10
Comparison Study of Robotic Thyroidectomies Through a Bilateral Axillo-Breast Approach and a Transoral Approach.经双侧腋窝-乳房入路与经口入路机器人甲状腺切除术的比较研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Feb;30(2):175-182. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0585. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical safety and effectiveness of bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.双侧腋窝入路机器人甲状腺切除术的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Mar-Apr;90(2):101376. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.101376. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
2
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Thyroid Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.微创甲状腺手术的结果 - 系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 12;12:719397. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.719397. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparison of the vessel sealer Extend with harmonic ACE in robotic bilateral axillary-breast approach thyroid surgery.
在机器人双侧腋窝-乳房入路甲状腺手术中,血管闭合器Extend与谐波ACE的比较。
Gland Surg. 2020 Apr;9(2):164-171. doi: 10.21037/gs.2020.01.18.
4
Bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy: review of evidences.双侧腋窝-乳房入路机器人甲状腺切除术:证据综述
Gland Surg. 2017 Jun;6(3):250-257. doi: 10.21037/gs.2017.04.05.
5
Comparative Study between Robotic Total Thyroidectomy with Central Lymph Node Dissection via Bilateral Axillo-breast Approach and Conventional Open Procedure for Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma.经双侧腋窝-乳房入路机器人甲状腺全切除术加中央淋巴结清扫术与传统开放手术治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌的对比研究
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Sep 20;129(18):2160-6. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.189911.