Suppr超能文献

基层医疗医生对慢性下腰痛的态度和信念:一项亚洲研究。

Primary care physicians' attitudes and beliefs towards chronic low back pain: an Asian study.

作者信息

Sit Regina W S, Yip Benjamin H K, Chan Dicken C C, Wong Samuel Y S

机构信息

School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Jan 30;10(1):e0117521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117521. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic low back pain is a serious global health problem. There is substantial evidence that physicians' attitudes towards and beliefs about chronic low back pain can influence their subsequent management of the condition.

OBJECTIVES

(1) to evaluate the attitudes and beliefs towards chronic low back pain among primary care physicians in Asia; (2) to study the cultural differences and other factors that are associated with these attitudes and beliefs.

METHOD

A cross sectional online survey was sent to primary care physicians who are members of the Hong Kong College of Family Physician (HKCFP). The Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapist (PABS-PT) was used as the questionnaire to determine the biomedical and biopsychosocial orientation of the participants.

RESULTS

The mean Biomedical (BM) score was 34.8+/-6.1; the mean biopsychosocial (BPS) score was 35.6 (+/- 4.8). Both scores were higher than those of European doctors. Family medicine specialists had a lower biomedical score than General practitioners. Physicians working in the public sector tended to have low BM and low BPS scores; whereas physicians working in private practice tended to have high BM and high BPS scores.

CONCLUSION

The lack of concordance in the pain explanatory models used by private and public sector may have a detrimental effect on patients who are under the care of both parties. The uncertain treatment orientation may have a negative influence on patients' attitudes and beliefs, thus contributing to the tension and, perhaps, even ailing mental state of a person with chronic LBP.

摘要

背景

慢性下腰痛是一个严重的全球性健康问题。有大量证据表明,医生对慢性下腰痛的态度和信念会影响他们随后对该病症的管理。

目的

(1)评估亚洲基层医疗医生对慢性下腰痛的态度和信念;(2)研究与这些态度和信念相关的文化差异及其他因素。

方法

向香港家庭医生学院(HKCFP)的成员基层医疗医生发送了一份横断面在线调查问卷。使用物理治疗师疼痛态度和信念量表(PABS-PT)作为问卷来确定参与者的生物医学和生物心理社会取向。

结果

生物医学(BM)平均得分是34.8±6.1;生物心理社会(BPS)平均得分是35.6(±4.8)。这两个得分均高于欧洲医生。家庭医学专家的生物医学得分低于全科医生。在公共部门工作的医生往往BM得分低且BPS得分低;而在私人诊所工作的医生往往BM得分高且BPS得分高。

结论

公共部门和私人部门使用的疼痛解释模型缺乏一致性可能会对接受双方治疗的患者产生不利影响。不确定的治疗取向可能会对患者的态度和信念产生负面影响,从而导致慢性下腰痛患者的紧张情绪,甚至可能导致其精神状态不佳。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验