• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Women's experiences seeking publicly funded family planning services in Texas.德克萨斯州女性寻求公共资助计划生育服务的经历。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015 Jun;47(2):63-70. doi: 10.1363/47e2815. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
2
Low-income women's access to contraception after health care reform in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州医疗改革后,低收入妇女获得避孕措施的机会。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2012 May-Jun;52(3):349-57. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2012.11033.
3
Public or private providers? U.S. women's use of reproductive health services.公立还是私立医疗机构?美国女性对生殖健康服务的利用情况。
Fam Plann Perspect. 2001 Jan-Feb;33(1):4-12.
4
Provision of contraceptive and related services by publicly funded family planning clinics, 2003.2003年由公共资助的计划生育诊所提供的避孕及相关服务
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006 Sep;38(3):139-47. doi: 10.1363/psrh.38.139.06.
5
Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.公共资助的避孕服务对意外怀孕的影响及其对医疗补助支出的意义。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Sep-Oct;28(5):188-95.
6
Low-Income Texas Women's Experiences Accessing Their Desired Contraceptive Method at the First Postpartum Visit.德克萨斯州低收入妇女在首次产后访视时获得理想避孕方法的体验。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Dec;50(4):189-198. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12083. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
7
Services for women's sexual and reproductive health in India: an analysis of treatment-seeking for symptoms of reproductive tract infections in a nationally representative survey.印度女性性与生殖健康服务:一项全国代表性调查中对生殖道感染症状寻求治疗的分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Jul 28;20(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01024-3.
8
State abortion context and U.S. women's contraceptive choices, 1995-2010.1995 - 2010年美国各州堕胎情况及美国女性的避孕选择
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015 Jun;47(2):71-82. doi: 10.1363/47e3015. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
9
The availability and use of publicly funded family planning clinics: U.S. trends, 1994-2001.公共资助的计划生育诊所的可及性与使用情况:美国趋势,1994 - 2001年
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;36(5):206-15. doi: 10.1363/psrh.36.206.04.
10
Utilization of Private Sector Family Planning Services in Malaysia.马来西亚私营部门计划生育服务的利用。
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2021 Jul;41(4):395-403. doi: 10.1177/0272684X20972864. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Publicly Funded Contraceptive Services and the Abortion Rate in Texas, 2010-2015.2010-2015 年德克萨斯州公共资助避孕服务与堕胎率之间的关系。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Feb 1;141(2):361-370. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005057. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
2
Minors' Experiences Accessing Confidential Contraception in Texas.德克萨斯州未成年人获取保密避孕措施的经历。
J Adolesc Health. 2023 Apr;72(4):591-598. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.11.230. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
3
A Prospective Cohort Study of Changes in Access to Contraceptive Care and Use Two Years after Iowa Medicaid Coverage Restrictions at Abortion-Providing Facilities Went into Effect.一项前瞻性队列研究:爱荷华州堕胎提供机构医疗补助覆盖限制生效两年后避孕护理可及性与使用情况的变化
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022;41(6):2555-2583. doi: 10.1007/s11113-022-09740-4. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
4
Differences in abortion rates by race-ethnicity after implementation of a restrictive Texas law.实施得克萨斯州一项限制堕胎法后,不同种族和族裔的堕胎率存在差异。
Contraception. 2020 Aug;102(2):109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
5
Women's Postabortion Contraceptive Preferences and Access to Family Planning Services in Mississippi.密西西比州女性流产后避孕方法选择偏好及计划生育服务可及性研究
Womens Health Issues. 2020 May-Jun;30(3):176-183. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
6
Unmet demand for short-acting hormonal and long-acting reversible contraception among community college students in Texas.德克萨斯州社区大学生对短效激素避孕法和长效可逆避孕法的需求未得到满足。
J Am Coll Health. 2018 Jul;66(5):360-368. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1431901. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
7
Providing Family Planning Services at Primary Care Organizations after the Exclusion of Planned Parenthood from Publicly Funded Programs in Texas: Early Qualitative Evidence.在德克萨斯州将计划生育组织从公共资助项目中排除后,在初级保健组织中提供计划生育服务:早期定性证据。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):2770-2786. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12783. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
8
A Systematic Review of Apps using Mobile Criteria for Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention (mCAPP).一项使用青少年怀孕预防移动标准(mCAPP)的应用程序的系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Nov 10;4(4):e122. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6611.
9
Change over time in attitudes about abortion laws relative to recent restrictions in Texas.相对于德克萨斯州近期的限制措施,人们对堕胎法的态度随时间的变化。
Contraception. 2016 Nov;94(5):447-452. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of reproductive health legislation on family planning clinic services in Texas.生殖健康立法对德克萨斯州计划生育诊所服务的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2015 May;105(5):851-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302515. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
2
Unmet demand for highly effective postpartum contraception in Texas.德克萨斯州对高效产后避孕措施的需求未得到满足。
Contraception. 2014 Nov;90(5):488-95. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.06.039. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
3
Change in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas.德克萨斯州实施一项限制性法律后堕胎服务的变化。
Contraception. 2014 Nov;90(5):496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
4
Improving the quality of family planning services: the role of new federal recommendations.提高计划生育服务质量:新联邦建议的作用。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Aug;23(8):636-41. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4865. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
5
Use of family planning and related medical services among women aged 15-44 in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth, 2006-2010.美国15至44岁女性的计划生育及相关医疗服务使用情况:2006 - 2010年全国家庭增长调查
Natl Health Stat Report. 2013 Sep 5(68):1-16, 20.
6
Title X: a critical difference.第十章:一个关键差异。
Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):71-2. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
7
The public health threat of anti-abortion legislation.反堕胎立法对公共卫生的威胁。
Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):73-4. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.10.012. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
8
Accessibility of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs).长效可逆避孕措施(LARCs)在联邦合格健康中心(FQHCs)中的可及性。
Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):91-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
9
Scope of family planning services available in Federally Qualified Health Centers.提供联邦合格健康中心的计划生育服务范围。
Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.09.015. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
10
Does parental consent for birth control affect underage pregnancy rates? The case of Texas.父母对避孕的同意是否会影响未成年怀孕率?以得克萨斯州为例。
Demography. 2013 Dec;50(6):2105-28. doi: 10.1007/s13524-013-0225-1.

德克萨斯州女性寻求公共资助计划生育服务的经历。

Women's experiences seeking publicly funded family planning services in Texas.

作者信息

Hopkins Kristine, White Kari, Linkin Fran, Hubert Celia, Grossman Daniel, Potter Joseph E

机构信息

Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin.

Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

出版信息

Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015 Jun;47(2):63-70. doi: 10.1363/47e2815. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1363/47e2815
PMID:25639913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4478214/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Little is known about low-income women's and teenagers' experiences accessing publicly funded family planning services, particularly after policy changes are made that affect the cost of and access to such services.

METHODS

Eleven focus groups were conducted with 92 adult women and 15 teenagers in nine Texas metropolitan areas in July-October 2012, a year after legislation that reduced access to subsidized family planning was enacted. Participants were recruited through organizations that serve low-income populations. At least two researchers independently coded the transcripts of the discussions and identified main themes.

RESULTS

Although most women were not aware of the legislative changes, they reported that in the past year, they had had to pay more for previously free or low-cost services, use less effective contraceptive methods or forgo care. They also indicated that accessing affordable family planning services had long been difficult, that applying and qualifying for programs was a challenge and that obtaining family planning care was harder than obtaining pregnancy-related care. As a result of an inadequate reproductive health safety net, women experienced unplanned pregnancies and were unable to access screening services and follow-up care. Teenagers experienced an additional barrier, the need to obtain parental consent. Some women preferred to receive family planning services from specialized providers, while others preferred more comprehensive care.

CONCLUSION

Women in Texas have long faced challenges in obtaining subsidized family planning services. Legislation that reduced access to family planning services for low-income women and teenagers appears to have added to those challenges.

摘要

背景

对于低收入女性和青少年获取公共资助的计划生育服务的经历,我们知之甚少,尤其是在政策发生变化影响此类服务的成本和可及性之后。

方法

2012年7月至10月,在德克萨斯州的九个大都市地区,针对92名成年女性和15名青少年开展了11个焦点小组访谈。这是在一项减少了获得补贴计划生育服务机会的立法颁布一年之后。参与者通过为低收入人群服务的组织招募。至少两名研究人员对讨论记录进行独立编码,并确定主要主题。

结果

尽管大多数女性并未意识到立法变化,但她们报告称,在过去一年里,她们不得不为以前免费或低成本的服务支付更多费用,使用效果较差的避孕方法或放弃护理。她们还表示,长期以来,获得负担得起的计划生育服务一直很困难,申请和符合项目资格是一项挑战,而且获得计划生育护理比获得与怀孕相关的护理更难。由于生殖健康安全网不足,女性经历了意外怀孕,并且无法获得筛查服务和后续护理。青少年还面临额外的障碍,即需要获得父母同意。一些女性更喜欢从专业提供者那里获得计划生育服务,而另一些女性则更喜欢更全面的护理。

结论

德克萨斯州的女性长期以来在获得补贴的计划生育服务方面面临挑战。减少低收入女性和青少年获得计划生育服务机会的立法似乎加剧了这些挑战。