• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相对于德克萨斯州近期的限制措施,人们对堕胎法的态度随时间的变化。

Change over time in attitudes about abortion laws relative to recent restrictions in Texas.

作者信息

Smith Chelsea

机构信息

Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin.

出版信息

Contraception. 2016 Nov;94(5):447-452. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.06.005
PMID:27318007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5075490/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Over the past 5 years, Texas has become a hotbed of debate on abortion rights and restrictions. Legislation in 2011 and 2013 made it more difficult for women to obtain abortions and for clinics to provide the procedure, laws which have resulted in practical obstacles and the closure of clinics. Less is known about whether that political activity has extended to public opinion on abortion in Texas, especially in the national context of increasing partisanship.

STUDY DESIGN

Data from the cross-sectional Houston Area Survey (HAS; n=4856) were used to compare attitudes about abortion at three time points: in 2010 before the major waves of legislation, in 2012 after the 2011 legislation, and in 2014 after the 2013 legislation. Logistic regressions estimated support for legal abortion over time, after adjusting for personal characteristics, views on other social issues, religiosity, political party identification and political ideology.

RESULTS

At all three time points studied, slightly more than half of Houstonians supported legal abortion for any reason a woman wanted to obtain one. Compared to 2010, support was significantly higher in 2012 and 2014, whereas the decline in support between 2012 and 2014 was not statistically significant after adjusting for religiosity and politics.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified increased public support for legal abortion following the Texas state legislature's restrictive laws in 2011 and 2013.

IMPLICATIONS

As the Texas legislature increasingly restricts access to abortion, residents of the state's largest and most diverse city do not hold attitudes in line with those restrictions. Clinicians may thus have more public support for their services than the divided political climate would suggest.

摘要

目的

在过去5年里,得克萨斯州已成为堕胎权利与限制问题的辩论温床。2011年和2013年的立法使女性更难获得堕胎服务,诊所也更难提供该手术,这些法律导致了实际障碍并致使诊所关闭。对于这种政治活动是否已扩展至得克萨斯州民众对堕胎的看法,尤其是在党派分歧日益加剧的全国背景下,人们了解得较少。

研究设计

来自横断面休斯敦地区调查(HAS;n = 4856)的数据被用于比较三个时间点对堕胎的态度:2010年在主要立法浪潮之前,2012年在2011年立法之后,以及2014年在2013年立法之后。在调整个人特征、对其他社会问题的看法、宗教信仰、政党认同和政治意识形态之后,逻辑回归估计了随时间推移对合法堕胎的支持情况。

结果

在所有三个研究时间点,略超过一半的休斯敦人支持女性出于任何她想要的原因进行合法堕胎。与2010年相比,2012年和2014年的支持率显著更高,而在调整宗教信仰和政治因素后,2012年至2014年支持率的下降在统计学上并不显著。

结论

本研究发现,在2011年和2013年得克萨斯州立法机构出台限制性法律后,公众对合法堕胎的支持有所增加。

启示

随着得克萨斯州立法机构越来越多地限制堕胎服务的获取,该州最大且最多样化城市的居民所持态度与这些限制并不一致。因此,临床医生可能会获得比分裂的政治氛围所显示的更多的公众对其服务的支持。

相似文献

1
Change over time in attitudes about abortion laws relative to recent restrictions in Texas.相对于德克萨斯州近期的限制措施,人们对堕胎法的态度随时间的变化。
Contraception. 2016 Nov;94(5):447-452. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
2
Does information about abortion safety affect Texas voters' opinions about restrictive laws? A randomized study.关于堕胎安全性的信息会影响德克萨斯州选民对限制性法律的看法吗?一项随机研究。
Contraception. 2017 Dec;96(6):381-387. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
3
Women's experiences seeking abortion care shortly after the closure of clinics due to a restrictive law in Texas.在得克萨斯州一项限制性法律导致诊所关闭后不久,女性寻求堕胎护理的经历。
Contraception. 2016 Apr;93(4):292-297. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.017. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
4
Change in Second-Trimester Abortion After Implementation of a Restrictive State Law.限制州法律实施后,妊娠中期堕胎的变化。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;133(4):771-779. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003183.
5
Women's Knowledge of and Support for Abortion Restrictions in Texas: Findings from a Statewide Representative Survey.德克萨斯州女性对堕胎限制的了解与支持:一项全州代表性调查的结果
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Dec;48(4):189-197. doi: 10.1363/48e8716. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
6
Ideology and opposition to abortion: trends in public opinion, 1972-1980.意识形态与对堕胎的反对:1972 - 1980年的民意趋势
Alternative Lifestyles. 1983 Fall;6(1):6-26. doi: 10.1007/BF01083251.
7
Cross-country abortion travel to England and Wales: results from a cross-sectional survey exploring people's experiences crossing borders to obtain care.跨境堕胎旅行至英格兰和威尔士:一项横断面调查研究人们跨境获取医疗服务的经验
Reprod Health. 2021 May 22;18(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01158-z.
8
Family planning policy in the United States: the converging politics of abortion and contraception.美国的计划生育政策:堕胎与避孕的趋同政治
Contraception. 2016 May;93(5):412-20. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
9
Women's Experience Obtaining Abortion Care in Texas after Implementation of Restrictive Abortion Laws: A Qualitative Study.德克萨斯州实施限制堕胎法后妇女获得堕胎护理的体验:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 26;11(10):e0165048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165048. eCollection 2016.
10
Matters of life and death: social, political, and religious correlates of attitudes on abortion.生死攸关之事:堕胎态度的社会、政治及宗教关联因素
Am Polit Q. 1981 Jan;9(1):89-102. doi: 10.1177/1532673x8100900105.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender linked fate explains lower legal abortion support among white married women.性别相关命运解释了白人已婚女性对合法堕胎支持率较低的原因。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 10;14(10):e0223271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223271. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Women's Knowledge of and Support for Abortion Restrictions in Texas: Findings from a Statewide Representative Survey.德克萨斯州女性对堕胎限制的了解与支持:一项全州代表性调查的结果
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Dec;48(4):189-197. doi: 10.1363/48e8716. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
2
Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas.在德克萨斯州实施一项限制性法律后,诊所关闭对妇女获得堕胎服务的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2016 May;106(5):857-64. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303134. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
3
The impact of reproductive health legislation on family planning clinic services in Texas.生殖健康立法对德克萨斯州计划生育诊所服务的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2015 May;105(5):851-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302515. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
4
Women's experiences seeking publicly funded family planning services in Texas.德克萨斯州女性寻求公共资助计划生育服务的经历。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015 Jun;47(2):63-70. doi: 10.1363/47e2815. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
5
Finding the Twitter users who stood with Wendy.找出支持温迪的推特用户。
Contraception. 2014 Nov;90(5):502-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
6
Change in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas.德克萨斯州实施一项限制性法律后堕胎服务的变化。
Contraception. 2014 Nov;90(5):496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
7
Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion.不受约束的党派人士:美国政治极化与公众舆论趋势
AJS. 2008 Jan 28;114(2):408-446. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1010098.
8
Cutting family planning in Texas.削减德克萨斯州的计划生育服务。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 27;367(13):1179-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1207920.
9
The supply-side economics of abortion.堕胎的供给侧经济学。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 20;365(16):1466-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1109889.
10
Abortion politics in the United States, 1972-1994: from single issue to ideology.1972 - 1994年美国的堕胎政治:从单一议题到意识形态
Gender Issues. 1999 Spring;17(2):3-34. doi: 10.1007/s12147-999-0013-9.