Smith Chelsea
Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin.
Contraception. 2016 Nov;94(5):447-452. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
Over the past 5 years, Texas has become a hotbed of debate on abortion rights and restrictions. Legislation in 2011 and 2013 made it more difficult for women to obtain abortions and for clinics to provide the procedure, laws which have resulted in practical obstacles and the closure of clinics. Less is known about whether that political activity has extended to public opinion on abortion in Texas, especially in the national context of increasing partisanship.
Data from the cross-sectional Houston Area Survey (HAS; n=4856) were used to compare attitudes about abortion at three time points: in 2010 before the major waves of legislation, in 2012 after the 2011 legislation, and in 2014 after the 2013 legislation. Logistic regressions estimated support for legal abortion over time, after adjusting for personal characteristics, views on other social issues, religiosity, political party identification and political ideology.
At all three time points studied, slightly more than half of Houstonians supported legal abortion for any reason a woman wanted to obtain one. Compared to 2010, support was significantly higher in 2012 and 2014, whereas the decline in support between 2012 and 2014 was not statistically significant after adjusting for religiosity and politics.
This study identified increased public support for legal abortion following the Texas state legislature's restrictive laws in 2011 and 2013.
As the Texas legislature increasingly restricts access to abortion, residents of the state's largest and most diverse city do not hold attitudes in line with those restrictions. Clinicians may thus have more public support for their services than the divided political climate would suggest.
在过去5年里,得克萨斯州已成为堕胎权利与限制问题的辩论温床。2011年和2013年的立法使女性更难获得堕胎服务,诊所也更难提供该手术,这些法律导致了实际障碍并致使诊所关闭。对于这种政治活动是否已扩展至得克萨斯州民众对堕胎的看法,尤其是在党派分歧日益加剧的全国背景下,人们了解得较少。
来自横断面休斯敦地区调查(HAS;n = 4856)的数据被用于比较三个时间点对堕胎的态度:2010年在主要立法浪潮之前,2012年在2011年立法之后,以及2014年在2013年立法之后。在调整个人特征、对其他社会问题的看法、宗教信仰、政党认同和政治意识形态之后,逻辑回归估计了随时间推移对合法堕胎的支持情况。
在所有三个研究时间点,略超过一半的休斯敦人支持女性出于任何她想要的原因进行合法堕胎。与2010年相比,2012年和2014年的支持率显著更高,而在调整宗教信仰和政治因素后,2012年至2014年支持率的下降在统计学上并不显著。
本研究发现,在2011年和2013年得克萨斯州立法机构出台限制性法律后,公众对合法堕胎的支持有所增加。
随着得克萨斯州立法机构越来越多地限制堕胎服务的获取,该州最大且最多样化城市的居民所持态度与这些限制并不一致。因此,临床医生可能会获得比分裂的政治氛围所显示的更多的公众对其服务的支持。