• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluating developmental motor plasticity with paired afferent stimulation.

作者信息

Damji Omar, Keess Jamie, Kirton Adam

机构信息

Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 Jun;57(6):548-55. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12704. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1111/dmcn.12704
PMID:25640772
Abstract

AIM

Brain plasticity mechanisms are probably different in children but remain poorly understood. Paired afferent stimulation (PAS) combines peripheral sensory stimulation with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of primary motor cortex to induce rapid, reversible, topographically specific increases in primary motor cortex excitability suggestive of long-term potentiation in adults. Our aim was to determine frequency, characteristics, age effects, and reproducibility of PAS in school-age children.

METHOD

Typically developing right-handed children (6-18y) were recruited. Median nerve stimulation was delivered 25ms before suprathreshold primary motor cortex stimulation (0.2Hz, 7.5min). Primary outcome was changed in the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) at five time points after PAS (0, 15, 30, 45, 75min) expressed as area under the curve. Reproducibility was evaluated. Secondary outcomes included stimulus response curves and safety/tolerability.

RESULTS

Of 28 children (20 males, mean age 12y), 64% demonstrated PAS effects (11 definite, seven probable). PAS effects were sustained across all time points to 75min (p=0.004). Stimulus response curve scores increased after PAS (n=9, p=0.02). PAS effect and age were not correlated. PAS was highly reproducible (p=0.925, r=0.283). Tolerability was favorable without adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

PAS effects are present and reproducible in children. Pediatric PAS paradigms appear safe and tolerable. PAS may provide insight into endogenous developmental plasticity, informing future studies in children with cerebral palsy and other motor disorders.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluating developmental motor plasticity with paired afferent stimulation.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 Jun;57(6):548-55. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12704. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
2
Role of sustained excitability of the leg motor cortex after transcranial magnetic stimulation in associative plasticity.经颅磁刺激后腿部运动皮层持续兴奋性在联合可塑性中的作用。
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Aug;98(2):657-67. doi: 10.1152/jn.00197.2007. Epub 2007 May 30.
3
A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex.一种支配人类运动皮层可塑性的时间不对称赫布规则。
J Neurophysiol. 2003 May;89(5):2339-45. doi: 10.1152/jn.00900.2002. Epub 2003 Jan 22.
4
Pallidal stimulation modifies after-effects of paired associative stimulation on motor cortex excitability in primary generalised dystonia.苍白球刺激可改变原发性全身性肌张力障碍中配对联想刺激对运动皮质兴奋性的后效应。
Exp Neurol. 2007 Jul;206(1):80-5. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.03.027. Epub 2007 Apr 4.
5
Induction of cortical plasticity for reciprocal muscles by paired associative stimulation.通过配对联想刺激诱导相互拮抗肌的皮质可塑性。
Brain Behav. 2014;4(6):822-32. doi: 10.1002/brb3.280. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
6
Inducing homeostatic-like plasticity in human motor cortex through converging corticocortical inputs.通过汇聚皮质-皮质输入诱导人类运动皮层产生类似内稳态的可塑性。
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;102(6):3180-90. doi: 10.1152/jn.91046.2008. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
7
Stimulus uncertainty enhances long-term potentiation-like plasticity in human motor cortex.刺激的不确定性增强了人类运动皮层中类似长时程增强的可塑性。
Cortex. 2017 Mar;88:32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
8
Modulation of the Direction and Magnitude of Hebbian Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex by Stimulus Intensity and Concurrent Inhibition.刺激强度和同时性抑制对人类运动皮层赫布可塑性的方向和幅度的调制。
Brain Stimul. 2017 Jan-Feb;10(1):83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
9
Effects of aging on the human motor cortical plasticity studied by paired associative stimulation.经对联合相关刺激研究发现,老化对人类运动皮质可塑性的影响。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Jan;121(1):90-3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.048. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
10
Effect of Paired Associative Stimulation on Motor Cortex Excitability in Rats.配对关联刺激对大鼠运动皮层兴奋性的影响。
Curr Med Sci. 2018 Oct;38(5):903-909. doi: 10.1007/s11596-018-1960-8. Epub 2018 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Sensorimotor Integration in Childhood Dystonia and Dystonic Cerebral Palsy-A Developmental Perspective.儿童肌张力障碍和肌张力障碍型脑性瘫痪中的感觉运动整合——一种发育视角
Front Neurol. 2021 Jul 23;12:668081. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.668081. eCollection 2021.
2
Corticospinal Tract Wiring and Brain Lesion Characteristics in Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: Determinants of Upper Limb Motor and Sensory Function.皮质脊髓束布线与单侧脑瘫脑损伤特征:上肢运动和感觉功能的决定因素。
Neural Plast. 2018 Sep 13;2018:2671613. doi: 10.1155/2018/2671613. eCollection 2018.
3
Paired-Associative Stimulation-Induced Long-term Potentiation-Like Motor Cortex Plasticity in Healthy Adolescents.
配对联想刺激诱导的健康青少年运动皮层类长时程增强可塑性
Front Psychiatry. 2017 May 29;8:95. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00095. eCollection 2017.
4
Transcranial Magnetic and Direct Current Stimulation in Children.儿童经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2017 Feb;17(2):11. doi: 10.1007/s11910-017-0719-0.
5
Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Children: A Systematic Review of the Literature.儿童经颅磁刺激的安全性:文献系统综述
Pediatr Neurol. 2017 Mar;68:3-17. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
6
Pediatric Neuromodulation Comes of Age.儿科神经调节步入成熟阶段。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Sep;26(7):578-81. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0087. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
7
Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case-Control Pilot Study.自闭症谱系障碍青少年的异常皮质可塑性:一项经颅磁刺激病例对照试点研究。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Sep;26(7):625-31. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0183. Epub 2016 Mar 23.