Smeltzer Suzanne C, Sharts-Hopko Nancy C, Cantrell Mary Ann, Heverly Mary Ann, Nthenge Serah, Jenkinson Amanda
Professor and Director, Center for Nursing Research, Villanova University College of Nursing, Villanova, PA, USA.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015 Mar;47(2):178-85. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12123. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
This study, which is part of a larger project, was conducted to profile the nursing faculty in the United States teaching in PhD and DNP programs.
This is a descriptive study. A sample of 554 nursing faculty who teach in PhD and DNP programs was recruited by email solicitation to represent all geographic regions of the United States. Data were collected from November 2013 through January 2014 using an online survey instrument.
The instrument was developed based on results of review of the literature and of focus groups of doctoral faculty (faculty teaching in doctoral programs) to ascertain characteristics of faculty teaching in doctoral programs and of the schools in which they teach. Frequencies and descriptive statistics are reported.
Growth in DNP programs has outpaced growth in PhD programs, and DNP graduates have moved into doctoral education in greater numbers than PhD graduates. DNP faculty report less prior experience and current productivity scholarship than faculty in PhD programs only or both types of programs.
Strategies are needed to ensure that doctoral programs are staffed by faculty who are prepared for doctoral education and the development of nursing science.
The Institute of Medicine has recommended doubling the number of doctorally prepared nurses in the United States by 2020 to ensure that sufficient numbers of faculty are available to prepare the nursing labor force that is needed for delivery of healthcare services. Nurse scientists are needed to contribute to improvement in patient care quality and safety, and practice leaders are needed to facilitate the translation of research into safe, high-quality, and cost-effective care. The landscape of doctoral education in nursing is rapidly changing.
本研究作为一个更大项目的一部分,旨在描绘在美国博士和实践博士项目中授课的护理教师概况。
这是一项描述性研究。通过电子邮件邀请,招募了554名在博士和实践博士项目中授课的护理教师作为样本,以代表美国所有地理区域。2013年11月至2014年1月期间,使用在线调查问卷收集数据。
该问卷是根据文献综述结果以及博士教师(在博士项目中授课的教师)焦点小组的结果开发的,以确定在博士项目中授课的教师及其授课学校的特征。报告了频率和描述性统计数据。
实践博士项目的增长速度超过了博士项目,实践博士毕业生进入博士教育领域的人数比博士毕业生更多。与仅在博士项目或同时在两种项目中授课的教师相比,实践博士教师报告的先前经验和当前生产力奖学金较少。
需要采取策略以确保博士项目配备有能力开展博士教育和护理科学发展工作的教师。
医学研究所建议到2020年将美国拥有博士学位的护士数量增加一倍,以确保有足够数量的教师来培养提供医疗服务所需的护理劳动力。需要护士科学家为改善患者护理质量和安全做出贡献,也需要实践领导者促进将研究成果转化为安全、高质量且具有成本效益的护理。护理博士教育的格局正在迅速变化。