• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The impact of the Nurse Faculty Scholars program on schools of nursing.护士教师学者计划对护理学院的影响。
Nurs Outlook. 2017 May-Jun;65(3):327-335. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
2
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars program leadership training.罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会护士教师学者项目领导力培训。
Nurs Outlook. 2017 May-Jun;65(3):290-302. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
3
Initial evaluation of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars program.罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会护士教师学者项目的初步评估
Nurs Outlook. 2014 Nov-Dec;62(6):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
4
Overview of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars program.罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会护士教师学者项目概述。
Nurs Outlook. 2017 May-Jun;65(3):254-264. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
5
Scholars' experiences with faculty mentoring: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Future of Nursing Scholars Program.学者们的师资指导经验:罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会未来护士学者计划。
Nurs Outlook. 2024 Sep-Oct;72(5):102247. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102247. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
6
A summative evaluation of productivity and accomplishments of Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars Program participants.对罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会护士教师学者项目参与者的生产力和成就进行的总结性评估。
J Prof Nurs. 2018 Jul-Aug;34(4):289-295. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
7
The impact of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Future of Nursing Scholars Program on scholars, schools and nursing science.罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会护理学者未来计划对学者、院校及护理科学的影响。
Nurs Outlook. 2023 Jan-Feb;71(1):101906. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2022.12.002. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
8
Building a mentoring network.建立一个指导网络。
Nurs Outlook. 2017 May-Jun;65(3):305-314. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2016.12.001. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
9
Diversity: A key aspect of 21st century faculty roles as implemented in the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars program.多样性:罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会护士教师学者项目所实施的21世纪教师角色的一个关键方面。
Nurs Outlook. 2017 May-Jun;65(3):267-277. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
10
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Future of Nursing Scholars program: An overview.罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会护理学者项目的未来:概述
Nurs Outlook. 2023 Jan-Feb;71(1):101891. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of an intensive workshop on research methods in supportive oncology.支持性肿瘤学研究方法强化研讨会评估
Palliat Support Care. 2024 Aug;22(4):649-654. doi: 10.1017/S1478951522001432.
2
Health literacy in childhood and adolescence. A bibliometric analysis of scientific publications and professionals' involvement.儿童和青少年时期的健康素养。科学出版物及专业人员参与情况的文献计量分析
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 10;9(1):e12896. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12896. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
Impact of faculty development programme on self-efficacy, competency and attitude towards medical education in Bhutan: a mixed-methods study.不丹教师发展计划对自我效能感、医学教育能力和态度的影响:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Dec 21;19(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1904-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Retention of faculty of color in academic nursing.有色人种护理教师在学术护理领域的留任情况。
Nurs Outlook. 2017 Mar-Apr;65(2):212-221. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
2
Nurse scientist or nursing scientist: Future considerations for the field.护士科学家还是护理学科学家:该领域的未来考量。
Nurs Outlook. 2016 Nov-Dec;64(6):523-524. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2016.09.008.
3
The National Hartford Center of Gerontological Nursing Excellence: An Evolution of a Nursing Initiative to Improve Care of Older Adults.美国国家哈特福德老年护理卓越中心:一项改善老年人护理的护理倡议的演变
Gerontologist. 2015 Jun;55 Suppl 1:S1-12. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv056.
4
A profile of U.S. nursing faculty in research- and practice-focused doctoral education.美国护理教师在以研究和实践为重点的博士教育中的概况。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015 Mar;47(2):178-85. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12123. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
5
Research career development: the importance of establishing a solid track record in nursing academia.研究职业发展:在护理学术界建立扎实业绩记录的重要性。
Collegian. 2014;21(3):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2013.04.005.
6
Quality of nursing doctoral education and scholarly performance in U.S. schools of nursing: strategic areas for improvement.美国护理学院护理博士教育质量与学术表现:改进的战略领域
J Prof Nurs. 2014 Jan-Feb;30(1):10-8. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2013.06.005.
7
ANF scholars (1955-2012): stepping stones to a nursing research career.澳大利亚护理学院学者(1955 - 2012):护理研究职业生涯的垫脚石。
Appl Nurs Res. 2014 Feb;27(1):2-24. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
8
Evaluating dedicated education units for clinical education quality.评估临床教育质量的专用教育单位。
J Nurs Educ. 2013 Nov;52(11):606-14. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20131014-07. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
9
Refocusing research priorities in schools of nursing.重新聚焦护理学院的研究重点。
J Prof Nurs. 2013 Jul-Aug;29(4):191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.10.005.
10
A report on a national study of doctoral nursing faculty.全国护理学博士教师研究报告。
Nurs Clin North Am. 2012 Dec;47(4):435-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2012.07.001.

护士教师学者计划对护理学院的影响。

The impact of the Nurse Faculty Scholars program on schools of nursing.

作者信息

McBride Angela Barron, Campbell Jacquelyn, Barr Taura, Duffy Joanne, Haozous Emily, Mallow Jennifer, Narsavage Georgia, Ridenour Nancy, Theeke Laurie

机构信息

Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN.

Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Nurs Outlook. 2017 May-Jun;65(3):327-335. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2017.01.013
PMID:28416201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5568121/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars program was conceptualized as not only promoting the growth and development of early-career faculty but as enhancing the research infrastructure of scholars' schools of nursing.

PURPOSE

At the completion of the scholars' three years of support, deans/directors were asked to provide feedback regarding the institutional impact of the scholars' participation in the program.

METHODS

Phone interviews were conducted on the first five completed cohorts and a six-item questionnaire was developed to obtain some quantitative data.

DISCUSSION

The program was viewed as having accelerated the scholars' leadership and scholarship, and their influence within the school/university and regionally/nationally. Deans/directors generally agreed that the scholars' experience helped build the school's research portfolio.

CONCLUSION

Looking back on how the participating schools of nursing fared, one can say that the program's institutional expectations were achieved most of the time. The program helped scholars build their own reputations and that in turn had consequences for the school's standing as a whole. A number of components are described that can be replicated singly or in various combinations by schools/universities interested in adopting aspects of this program.

摘要

背景

罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会护士教师学者项目的构想不仅是促进早期职业教师的成长与发展,还在于加强学者所在护理学院的研究基础设施。

目的

在学者获得三年支持期结束时,要求院长/主任就学者参与该项目对机构的影响提供反馈。

方法

对前五个完成项目的队列进行电话访谈,并编制了一份包含六个项目的问卷以获取一些定量数据。

讨论

该项目被视为加速了学者的领导力和学术成就,以及他们在学校/大学内部和地区/全国范围内的影响力。院长/主任普遍认为学者的经历有助于建立学校的研究组合。

结论

回顾参与项目的护理学院的表现,可以说该项目的机构期望在大多数情况下都得以实现。该项目帮助学者建立了自己的声誉,进而对学校的整体地位产生了影响。文中描述了一些组成部分,有兴趣采用该项目某些方面的学校/大学可以单独或组合复制这些部分。