Bolli G B, Riddle M C, Bergenstal R M, Ziemen M, Sestakauskas K, Goyeau H, Home P D
Department of Medicine, Perugia University Medical School, Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Apr;17(4):386-94. doi: 10.1111/dom.12438. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
To compare the efficacy and safety of new insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) with that of glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes using oral glucose-lowering drugs.
The EDITION 3 study was a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study. Participants were randomized to Gla-300 or Gla-100 once daily for 6 months, discontinuing sulphonylureas and glinides, with a dose titration aimed at achieving pre-breakfast plasma glucose concentrations of 4.4-5.6 mmol/l (80-100 mg/dl). The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to month 6. The main secondary endpoint was percentage of participants with ≥1 nocturnal confirmed [≤3.9 mmol/l (≤70 mg/dl)] or severe hypoglycaemia from week 9 to month 6. Other measures of glycaemia and hypoglycaemia, weight change and insulin dose were assessed.
Randomized participants (n = 878) had a mean (standard deviation) age of 57.7 (10.1) years, diabetes duration 9.8 (6.4) years, body mass index 33.0 (6.7) kg/m(2) and HbA1c 8.54 (1.06) % [69.8 (11.6) mmol/mol]. HbA1c levels decreased by equivalent amounts with the two treatments; the least squares mean difference in change from baseline was 0.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.09 to 0.17] % or 0.4 (-1.0 to 1.9) mmol/mol. Numerically fewer participants reported ≥1 nocturnal confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/l) or severe hypoglycaemia from week 9 to month 6 [relative risk (RR) 0.89 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.20)] with Gla-300 versus Gla-100; a significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia with this definition was found over the 6-month treatment period [RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.99)]. No between-treatment differences in adverse events were identified.
Gla-300 is as effective as Gla-100 in reducing HbA1c in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes, with lower hypoglycaemia risk.
比较新型300U/ml甘精胰岛素(Gla-300)与100U/ml甘精胰岛素(Gla-100)在使用口服降糖药的2型糖尿病初治患者中的疗效和安全性。
EDITION 3研究是一项多中心、开放标签、平行组研究。参与者被随机分为每日一次接受Gla-300或Gla-100治疗,为期6个月,停用磺脲类药物和格列奈类药物,剂量滴定旨在使早餐前血浆葡萄糖浓度达到4.4-5.6 mmol/l(80-100 mg/dl)。主要终点是糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)从基线到第6个月的变化。主要次要终点是从第9周到第6个月夜间确认低血糖[≤3.9 mmol/l(≤70 mg/dl)]或严重低血糖的参与者百分比。评估了其他血糖和低血糖指标、体重变化和胰岛素剂量。
随机分组的参与者(n = 878)平均(标准差)年龄为57.7(10.1)岁,糖尿病病程9.8(6.4)年,体重指数33.0(6.7)kg/m²,HbA1c为8.54(1.06)% [69.8(11.6)mmol/mol]。两种治疗使HbA1c水平下降幅度相当;从基线变化的最小二乘均值差异为0.04 [95%置信区间(CI)-0.09至0.17]%或0.4(-1.0至1.9)mmol/mol。从第9周到第6个月,报告夜间确认低血糖(≤3.9 mmol/l)或严重低血糖的参与者数量在数值上Gla-300组比Gla-100组少[相对风险(RR)0.89(95%CI 0.66至1.20)];在6个月的治疗期内,采用此定义低血糖风险显著更低[RR 0.76(95%CI 0.59至0.99)]。未发现治疗组间不良事件存在差异。
在2型糖尿病初治患者中,Gla-300在降低HbA1c方面与Gla-100同样有效,且低血糖风险更低。