Suppr超能文献

德谷胰岛素 300 单位/毫升与甘精胰岛素 100 单位/毫升治疗口服降糖药和基础胰岛素控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:一项 6 个月随机对照研究(EDITION 2)

New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using oral agents and basal insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 2).

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, and Minerva Foundation Institute for Medical Research, Helsinki, Finland

International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet, Minneapolis, MN.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2014 Dec;37(12):3235-43. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0990. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of new insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) with glargine 100 units/mL (Gla-100) in people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin (≥42 units/day) plus oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OADs).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

EDITION 2 was a multicenter, open-label, two-arm study. Adults receiving basal insulin plus OADs were randomized to Gla-300 or Gla-100 once daily for 6 months. The primary end point was change in HbA1c. The main secondary end point was percentage of participants with one or more nocturnal confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycemic events from week 9 to month 6.

RESULTS

Randomized participants (n = 811) had a mean (SD) HbA₁c of 8.24% (0.82) and BMI of 34.8 kg/m(2) (6.4). Glycemic control improved similarly with both basal insulins; least squares mean (SD) reduction from baseline was -0.57% (0.09) for Gla-300 and -0.56% (0.09) for Gla-100 (mean difference -0.01% [95% CI -0.14 to 0.12]), with 10% higher dose of Gla-300. Less nocturnal confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycemia was observed with Gla-300 from week 9 to month 6 (relative risk 0.77 [95% CI 0.61-0.99]; P = 0.038) and during the first 8 weeks. Fewer nocturnal and any time (24 h) hypoglycemic events were reported during the entire 6-month period. Weight gain was lower with Gla-300 than with Gla-100 (P = 0.015). No between-treatment differences in safety parameters were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Gla-300 was as effective as Gla-100 and associated with a lower risk of hypoglycemia during the night and at any time of the day.

摘要

目的

比较新型胰岛素甘精胰岛素 300 单位/毫升(Gla-300)与甘精胰岛素 100 单位/毫升(Gla-100)在使用基础胰岛素(≥42 单位/天)加口服降糖药(OADs)的 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性。

研究设计和方法

EDITION 2 是一项多中心、开放标签、双臂研究。接受基础胰岛素加 OAD 治疗的成年人被随机分为 Gla-300 或 Gla-100 组,每日一次,治疗 6 个月。主要终点是 HbA1c 的变化。主要次要终点是从第 9 周到第 6 个月,有一个或多个夜间确认(≤3.9mmol/L[≤70mg/dL])或严重低血糖事件的参与者比例。

结果

随机参与者(n=811)的平均(SD)HbA₁c 为 8.24%(0.82)和 BMI 为 34.8kg/m²(6.4)。两种基础胰岛素的血糖控制均有相似改善;Gla-300 的最小二乘均值(SD)从基线下降-0.57%(0.09),Gla-100 为-0.56%(0.09)(平均差异-0.01%[95%CI-0.14 至 0.12]),Gla-300 的剂量高 10%。从第 9 周到第 6 个月(相对风险 0.77[95%CI0.61-0.99];P=0.038)和前 8 周,夜间确认(≤3.9mmol/L[≤70mg/dL])或严重低血糖事件发生的次数较少。在整个 6 个月期间,夜间和任何时间(24 小时)低血糖事件报告的次数较少。Gla-300 治疗组体重增加低于 Gla-100 治疗组(P=0.015)。两种治疗方法在安全性参数方面无差异。

结论

Gla-300 与 Gla-100 疗效相当,夜间和白天任何时候低血糖的风险较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验