Lavine Elana, Ben-Shoshan Moshe
Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Allergy Clinic, Humber River Regional Hospital, c / o 404-586 Eglinton Avenue East, Toronto, ON Canada M4P 1P2.
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC Canada.
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2015 Jan 8;11(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13223-014-0065-6. eCollection 2015.
It is hypothesized that household exposure to allergenic proteins via an impaired skin barrier, such as atopic dermatitis, may contribute to the development of IgE sensitization. Household presence of peanut is a risk factor for the development of peanut allergy in children. Sunflower seed butter is a peanut-free alternative to peanut butter, and sunflower seed allergy is an uncommon but reported entity.
A 3 year old boy presented with oral discomfort that developed almost immediately after he ate sunflower seeds for the first time. He was given a dose of diphenhydramine. Subsequently he vomited, and his symptoms gradually resolved. A similar episode occurred to a commercial snack made with sunflower seed butter. Skin prick testing demonstrated a large positive (10 mm wheal) wheal-and-flare response to a slurry of fresh sunflower seed within 3-4 minutes associated with severe pruritus. This child has an older sibling with confirmed peanut allergy (PNA). After the PNA diagnosis was made, the family home became peanut-free. In lieu of peanut butter, sunflower butter was purchased and eaten frequently by family members, but not by the child reported herein. Subsequent to the episodes above, the child ate a bread roll with visible poppy seeds and developed itchy throat, dyspnea, and urticaria. Epicutaneous skin testing elicited a >10 mm wheal size within 3-4 minutes in response to a slurry of whole poppy seeds and 8 mm to fresh pumpkin seed, which had never been consumed.
A case of sunflower allergy in the context of household consumption of sunflower butter has not yet been reported. We suggest that homes which are intentionally peanut-safe may provide an environment whereby infants with impaired skin barrier are at increased risk of allergy to alternative "butter" products being used, via cutaneous exposure to these products preceding oral introduction to the child.
据推测,通过受损的皮肤屏障(如特应性皮炎)使家庭暴露于变应原蛋白可能会导致IgE致敏的发生。家庭中存在花生是儿童发生花生过敏的一个危险因素。葵花籽酱是花生酱的一种不含花生的替代品,而葵花籽过敏是一种不常见但有报道的情况。
一名3岁男孩在首次食用葵花籽后几乎立即出现口腔不适。他服用了一剂苯海拉明。随后他呕吐,症状逐渐缓解。食用用葵花籽酱制作的商业零食时也发生了类似情况。皮肤点刺试验显示,在3 - 4分钟内对新鲜葵花籽浆液产生了大的阳性(风团直径10毫米)风团和红晕反应,并伴有严重瘙痒。这个孩子有一个确诊为花生过敏(PNA)的哥哥。在确诊PNA后,家里不再有花生。代替花生酱,家人购买并经常食用葵花籽酱,但本文所述的孩子不吃。在上述事件之后,这个孩子吃了一个有明显罂粟籽的面包卷,出现了喉咙发痒、呼吸困难和荨麻疹。斑贴试验显示,在3 - 4分钟内对全罂粟籽浆液的反应风团大小>10毫米,对从未食用过的新鲜南瓜籽的反应风团大小为8毫米。
尚未有家庭食用葵花籽酱导致葵花籽过敏的病例报道。我们认为,有意保证无花生的家庭环境可能会使皮肤屏障受损的婴儿面临更高的过敏风险,因为在给孩子经口引入这些产品之前,他们通过皮肤接触了这些替代性“酱”类产品。