• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Score Reflect the Clinical Reasoning Ability of Medical Students?客观结构化临床考试成绩能反映医学生的临床推理能力吗?
Am J Med Sci. 2015 Jul;350(1):64-7. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000420.
2
Assessing musculoskeletal examination skills and diagnostic reasoning of 4th year medical students using a novel objective structured clinical exam.使用新型客观结构化临床考试评估四年级医学生的肌肉骨骼检查技能和诊断推理能力。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 14;16(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0780-4.
3
Influences of OSCE design on students' diagnostic reasoning.客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)设计对学生诊断推理的影响。
Med Educ. 2015 Feb;49(2):203-14. doi: 10.1111/medu.12635.
4
The objective structured clinical examination: can physician-examiners participate from a distance?客观结构化临床考试:医师考官能否远程参与?
Med Educ. 2014 Apr;48(4):441-50. doi: 10.1111/medu.12326.
5
Differential diagnosis in a 3-station acute abdominal pain objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): a needs assessment in third-year medical student performance and summative evaluation in the surgical clerkship.三站式急性腹痛客观结构化临床考试中的鉴别诊断:对三年级医学生表现的需求评估和外科学实习中的总结性评估。
J Surg Educ. 2011 Jul-Aug;68(4):266-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
6
The relationship between second-year medical students' OSCE scores and USMLE Step 2 scores.二年级医学生客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)成绩与美国医师执照考试第二步(USMLE Step 2)成绩之间的关系。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;13(6):901-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00768.x.
7
Effect of enhanced analytic reasoning on diagnostic accuracy: a randomized controlled study.增强分析推理对诊断准确性的影响:一项随机对照研究。
Med Teach. 2013;35(3):248-50. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.759643. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
8
The relationship between second-year medical students' OSCE scores and USMLE Step 1 scores.二年级医学生客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)成绩与美国医师执照考试第一步(USMLE Step 1)成绩之间的关系。
Med Teach. 2002 Sep;24(5):535-9. doi: 10.1080/0142159021000012586.
9
Faculty as simulated patients (FSPs) in assessing medical students' clinical reasoning skills.教师作为模拟患者(FSPs)评估医学生的临床推理能力。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2009 Dec;22(3):323. Epub 2009 Nov 20.
10
Order effects in high stakes undergraduate examinations: an analysis of 5 years of administrative data in one UK medical school.高风险本科考试中的顺序效应:对英国一所医学院5年管理数据的分析
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 11;6(10):e012541. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012541.

引用本文的文献

1
Blurring the Line Between Standardized and Real Patients: Twelve Tips for Improving the Authenticity of Standardized Patient Encounters.模糊标准化患者与真实患者之间的界限:提高标准化患者问诊真实性的十二条建议。
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Nov 12;35(2):1017-1024. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02220-8. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Immersive Virtual Reality and AI (Generative Pretrained Transformer) to Enhance Student Preparedness for Objective Structured Clinical Examinations: Mixed Methods Study.沉浸式虚拟现实与人工智能(生成式预训练变换器)提升学生应对客观结构化临床考试的准备程度:混合方法研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2025 Apr 30;13:e69428. doi: 10.2196/69428.
3
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) Status toward Clinical Reasoning and Evidence-Based Medicine among the Medical Interns and Gynecology Residents of Iran University of Medical Sciences.伊朗医科大学医学实习生和妇科住院医师对临床推理和循证医学的知识、态度和实践(KAP)状况。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2024 Mar 13;2024:6546432. doi: 10.1155/2024/6546432. eCollection 2024.
4
Assessing clinical reasoning ability in fourth-year medical students via an integrative group history-taking with an individual reasoning activity.通过整合式小组问诊与个体推理活动评估四年级医学生的临床推理能力。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 26;22(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03649-4.
5
Psychometric properties of a clinical reasoning assessment rubric for nursing education.护理教育临床推理评估量表的心理测量特性。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Sep 22;20(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00695-z.
6
A scoping review of clinical reasoning research with Asian healthcare professionals.亚洲医护专业人员临床推理研究的范围综述。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021 Dec;26(5):1555-1579. doi: 10.1007/s10459-021-10060-z. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
7
Evaluating the impact of a medical school cohort sexual health course on knowledge, counseling skills and sexual attitude change.评估医学院队列性健康课程对知识、咨询技能和性态度改变的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 8;21(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02482-x.
8
A novel model of clinical reasoning: cognitive zipper model.一种新型临床推理模型:认知拉链模型。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020 Apr;8(2):61-71. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2020.82230.1050.
9
Five decades of research and theorization on clinical reasoning: a critical review.临床推理的五十年研究与理论化:批判性综述
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Aug 27;10:703-716. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S213492. eCollection 2019.
10
Revisiting Miller's pyramid in medical education: the gap between traditional assessment and diagnostic reasoning.重新审视医学教育中的米勒金字塔:传统评估与诊断推理之间的差距。
Int J Med Educ. 2019 Oct 25;10:191-192. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5d9b.0c37.

本文引用的文献

1
Key-feature questions for assessment of clinical reasoning: a literature review.关键特征问题评估临床推理:文献综述。
Med Educ. 2014 Sep;48(9):870-83. doi: 10.1111/medu.12509.
2
The feasibility, reliability, and validity of a post-encounter form for evaluating clinical reasoning.评估临床推理后测表的可行性、可靠性和有效性。
Med Teach. 2012;34(1):30-7. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.590557.
3
Assessment of medical student clinical reasoning by "lay" vs physician raters: inter-rater reliability using a scoring guide in a multidisciplinary objective structured clinical examination.采用评分指南对医学生临床推理能力进行“外行”与医师评定者评估:多学科客观结构化临床考试中的评分者间信度。
Am J Surg. 2012 Jan;203(1):81-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.08.003.
4
Assessing clinical reasoning skills in scenarios of uncertainty: convergent validity for a Script Concordance Test in an emergency medicine clerkship and residency.评估不确定性情境下的临床推理技能:急诊实习和住院医师培训中脚本一致性测试的收敛效度。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;18(6):627-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01084.x.
5
The validity of performance-based measures of clinical reasoning and alternative approaches.基于表现的临床推理测量方法及替代方法的有效性。
Med Educ. 2009 Apr;43(4):320-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03281.x.
6
Is assessment of clinical reasoning still the Holy Grail?临床推理评估仍是圣杯吗?
Med Educ. 2009 Apr;43(4):298-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03290.x.
7
What predicts USMLE Step 3 performance?哪些因素能预测美国医师执照考试第三步(USMLE Step 3)的成绩?
Acad Med. 2005 Oct;80(10 Suppl):S21-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200510001-00009.
8
The relationship between the National Board of Medical Examiners' prototype of the Step 2 clinical skills exam and interns' performance.美国国家医学考试委员会第二步临床技能考试原型与实习生表现之间的关系。
Acad Med. 2005 May;80(5):496-501. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200505000-00019.
9
Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination.比较用于评估客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)形式考试表现的检查表和整体评分量表的心理测量特性。
Acad Med. 1998 Sep;73(9):993-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199809000-00020.
10
Issues of validity and reliability concerning who scores the post-encounter patient-progress note.关于谁对会诊后患者进展记录进行评分的有效性和可靠性问题。
Acad Med. 1997 Oct;72(10 Suppl 1):S79-81. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199710001-00027.

客观结构化临床考试成绩能反映医学生的临床推理能力吗?

Does Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Score Reflect the Clinical Reasoning Ability of Medical Students?

作者信息

Park Wan Beom, Kang Seok Hoon, Lee Yoon-Seong, Myung Sun Jung

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine (WBP), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Office of Medical Education (SHK, SJM), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; and Department of Forensic Medicine (Y-SL), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Am J Med Sci. 2015 Jul;350(1):64-7. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000420.

DOI:10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000420
PMID:25647834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4495861/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical reasoning ability is an important factor in a physician's competence and thus should be taught and tested in medical schools. Medical schools generally use objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) to measure the clinical competency of medical students. However, it is unknown whether OSCE can also evaluate clinical reasoning ability. In this study, the authors investigated whether OSCE scores reflected students' clinical reasoning abilities.

METHODS

Sixty-five fourth-year medical students participated in this study. Medical students completed the OSCE with 4 cases using standardized patients. For assessment of clinical reasoning, students were asked to list differential diagnoses and the findings that were compatible or not compatible with each diagnosis. The OSCE score (score of patient encounter), diagnostic accuracy score, clinical reasoning score, clinical knowledge score and grade point average (GPA) were obtained for each student, and correlation analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Clinical reasoning score was significantly correlated with diagnostic accuracy and GPA (correlation coefficient = 0.258 and 0.380; P = 0.038 and 0.002, respectively) but not with OSCE score or clinical knowledge score (correlation coefficient = 0.137 and 0.242; P = 0.276 and 0.052, respectively). Total OSCE score was not significantly correlated with clinical knowledge test score, clinical reasoning score, diagnostic accuracy score or GPA.

CONCLUSIONS

OSCE score from patient encounters did not reflect the clinical reasoning abilities of the medical students in this study. The evaluation of medical students' clinical reasoning abilities through OSCE should be strengthened.

摘要

背景

临床推理能力是医生能力的一个重要因素,因此医学院校应该对其进行教学和测试。医学院校通常使用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)来衡量医学生的临床能力。然而,尚不清楚OSCE是否也能评估临床推理能力。在本研究中,作者调查了OSCE分数是否反映了学生的临床推理能力。

方法

65名四年级医学生参与了本研究。医学生使用标准化病人完成了包含4个病例的OSCE。为了评估临床推理,要求学生列出鉴别诊断以及与每个诊断相符或不相符的发现。获取了每名学生的OSCE分数(接诊分数)、诊断准确性分数、临床推理分数、临床知识分数和平均绩点(GPA),并进行了相关性分析。

结果

临床推理分数与诊断准确性和GPA显著相关(相关系数分别为0.258和0.380;P分别为0.038和0.002),但与OSCE分数或临床知识分数无关(相关系数分别为0.137和0.242;P分别为0.276和0.052)。OSCE总分与临床知识测试分数、临床推理分数、诊断准确性分数或GPA均无显著相关性。

结论

本研究中来自接诊的OSCE分数并未反映医学生的临床推理能力。应加强通过OSCE对医学生临床推理能力的评估。