• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经静脉导线拔除的多学科方法:单中心经验

Multidisciplinary approach to transvenous lead extraction: a single center's experience.

作者信息

Maus Timothy M, Shurter Jesse, Nguyen Liem, Birgersdotter-Green Ulrika, Pretorius Victor

机构信息

Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center; University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.

Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center; University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Apr;29(2):265-70. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2014.11.010
PMID:25649700
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the success and complication rates of a single center's multidisciplinary approach to transvenous lead extraction.

SETTING

One university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred ninety-five patients scheduled for transvenous lead extraction.

INTERVENTIONS

A multidisciplinary approach to transvenous lead extraction involving cardiac surgery, electrophysiology, perfusion, and cardiac anesthesiology.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A case series of 351 lead extractions performed in 195 patients over a 42-month period. Indications, success rates, and complication rates were tracked and retrospectively evaluated and reported. Indications for lead extraction included 53.3% because of lead malfunction, 36.9% because of infection, with the remaining 9.7% from other categories such as venous stenosis. The lead extraction rate was 99.7%, with complete removal in 97.7%. The overall major complication rate was 3.08%. After an initial 1-year period of performing lead extractions, the overall major complication rate reduced to 1.23%.

CONCLUSIONS

Transvenous lead extraction generally is a safe procedure, but not without complications. A multidisciplinary approach involving cardiac surgery, electrophysiology, and cardiac anesthesiology allows for successful management and the ability to rapidly manage major complications.

摘要

目的

评估单中心采用多学科方法进行经静脉导线拔除的成功率和并发症发生率。

地点

一家大学医院。

参与者

195例计划进行经静脉导线拔除的患者。

干预措施

采用涉及心脏外科、电生理学、灌注和心脏麻醉学的多学科方法进行经静脉导线拔除。

测量指标和主要结果

在42个月期间对195例患者进行了351次导线拔除的病例系列研究。对适应证、成功率和并发症发生率进行跟踪,并进行回顾性评估和报告。导线拔除的适应证包括:因导线故障占53.3%,因感染占36.9%,其余9.7%来自其他类别,如静脉狭窄。导线拔除率为99.7%,完全拔除率为97.7%。总体主要并发症发生率为3.08%。在开始进行导线拔除的1年之后,总体主要并发症发生率降至1.23%。

结论

经静脉导线拔除通常是一种安全的操作,但并非没有并发症。涉及心脏外科、电生理学和心脏麻醉学的多学科方法能够成功进行管理,并能够迅速处理主要并发症。

相似文献

1
Multidisciplinary approach to transvenous lead extraction: a single center's experience.经静脉导线拔除的多学科方法:单中心经验
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Apr;29(2):265-70. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
2
Clinical utility of intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography during transvenous lead extraction.经静脉导线拔除术中经食管超声心动图的临床应用价值
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008 Jul;21(7):861-7. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.01.006. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
3
Clinical utility of routine use of continuous transesophageal echocardiography monitoring during transvenous lead extraction procedure.经静脉导线拔除术中常规使用连续经食管超声心动图监测的临床应用价值。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Feb;12(2):313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
4
Safety and efficacy of internal transjugular approach for transvenous extraction of implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads.经颈内静脉途径经静脉取出植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的安全性和有效性。
Europace. 2014 Sep;16(9):1356-62. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu004. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
5
Twenty-year experience of transvenous lead extraction at a single centre.单中心经静脉导线拔除术的20年经验。
Europace. 2014 Sep;16(9):1350-5. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut424. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
6
Predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality after transvenous lead extraction: a single-centre experience.经静脉导线拔除术后 30 天和 1 年死亡率的预测因素:单中心经验。
Europace. 2014 Aug;16(8):1218-25. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut410. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
7
Percutaneous lead and system extraction in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices and coronary sinus leads.心脏再同步治疗(CRT)设备及冠状窦导线患者的经皮导线及系统拔除术
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Oct;34(10):1209-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03149.x. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
8
Comparison of standard and modified transvenous techniques for complex pacemaker lead extractions in the context of cardiac implantable electronic device-related infections: a 10-year experience.在心脏植入式电子设备相关感染的情况下,比较标准和改良的经静脉技术用于复杂起搏器导线拔除:一项 10 年经验。
Europace. 2013 Nov;15(11):1629-35. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut077. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
9
High-risk lead removal by planned sequential transvenous laser extraction and minimally invasive right thoracotomy.通过计划性序贯经静脉激光取出术和微创右胸切开术进行高风险铅取出。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Jun;25(6):617-21. doi: 10.1111/jce.12368. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
10
Transvenous lead extraction at the time of cardiac implantable electronic device upgrade: Complexity, safety, and outcomes.经静脉心脏植入式电子设备升级时的导线拔除术:复杂性、安全性和结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Dec;14(12):1807-1811. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of the impact of organisational model of transvenous lead extraction on the effectiveness and safety of procedure: an observational study.评估经静脉导线拔除术的组织模型对程序的有效性和安全性的影响:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 29;12(12):e062952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062952.
2
Patient Safety Is the First Priority.患者安全是首要任务。
JACC Case Rep. 2022 Sep 21;4(18):1224. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2022.05.037.
3
A Study of Major and Minor Complications of 1500 Transvenous Lead Extraction Procedures Performed with Optimal Safety at Two High-Volume Referral Centers.
在两家高容量转诊中心,以最佳安全性实施的 1500 例经静脉导线拔除术的主要和次要并发症研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 3;18(19):10416. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910416.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Extraction in Elderly Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.老年患者心血管植入式电子装置取出术的安全性和有效性:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Heart Rhythm O2. 2020 Oct;1(4):250-258. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
5
Early Versus Delayed Lead Extraction in Patients With Infected Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices.早期与延迟取出感染性心血管植入电子设备患者的心脏起搏器/除颤器。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Jun;7(6):755-763. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
6
Minimally Invasive Techniques to Avoid Sternotomy in Complex Lead Extraction Cases.复杂导线拔除病例中避免开胸的微创技术。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2019 Feb 15;10(2):3515-3521. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2019.100201. eCollection 2019 Feb.
7
Management of Cardiac Electronic Device Infections: Challenges and Outcomes.心脏电子设备感染的管理:挑战与结果
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016;5(3):183-187. doi: 10.15420/aer.2016:21:2.
8
A Case of Arterial and Venous Tear during Single Lead Extraction.单根导线拔除过程中动静脉撕裂1例。
Case Rep Cardiol. 2016;2016:3836754. doi: 10.1155/2016/3836754. Epub 2016 Apr 18.