Suppr超能文献

时间变异性可预测发育性阅读障碍组间注意瞬脱差异的大小:一项荟萃分析。

Temporal variability predicts the magnitude of between-group attentional blink differences in developmental dyslexia: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Badcock Nicholas A, Kidd Joanna C

机构信息

ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University , North Ryde, New South Wales , Australia.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2015 Jan 22;3:e746. doi: 10.7717/peerj.746. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Background. Here we report on a meta-analysis of the between-group main effect (Group Difference) noted in the attentional blink (AB) research focused on specific reading impairment, commonly referred to as developmental dyslexia. The AB effect relates to a limitation in the allocation of attention over time and is examined in a dual-target rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm. When the second target appears in close temporal proximity to the first target, the second target is reported less accurately. Method. A Web of Science search with terms "attentional blink" & dyslexia returned 13 AB experiments (11 papers) conducted with developmental dyslexia. After exclusions, 12 experiments were included in the meta-analysis. The main pattern of performance from those experiments was lower overall accuracy in groups of individuals with dyslexia relative to typically reading peers; that is, a between-group main effect. This meta-analysis examined the size of the Group Difference in relation to temporal and task-set related features, which differed between and within experiments. Results. Random effects modelling indicated a significant Group Difference of -0.74 standard deviation units, 95% CI [-.96, -.52], p < .001 (excluding one anomalous result): implicating significantly poorer overall dual-target performance in dyslexic readers. Meta-regression analyses indicated two variables related to the Group Difference; pre-RSVP time and temporal variability of the second target relative to the first target within the RSVP. Discussion. It is suggested that the endogenous engagement of the temporal features of task-set is slower or disrupted in developmental dyslexia.

摘要

背景。在此,我们报告一项针对注意力瞬脱(AB)研究中组间主效应(组间差异)的荟萃分析,该研究聚焦于特定阅读障碍,通常称为发育性阅读障碍。AB效应与注意力随时间分配的局限性有关,并在双目标快速序列视觉呈现(RSVP)范式中进行研究。当第二个目标在时间上与第一个目标接近出现时,对第二个目标的报告准确性较低。方法。使用“注意力瞬脱”和“阅读障碍”等术语在科学网进行搜索,返回了13项针对发育性阅读障碍进行的AB实验(11篇论文)。排除后,12项实验纳入荟萃分析。这些实验的主要表现模式是,与正常阅读的同龄人相比,阅读障碍个体组的总体准确性较低;也就是说,存在组间主效应。这项荟萃分析研究了组间差异的大小与时间和任务集相关特征的关系,这些特征在不同实验之间和实验内部有所不同。结果。随机效应模型显示组间差异显著,为-0.74个标准差单位,95%置信区间[-0.96, -0.52],p <.001(排除一个异常结果):这意味着阅读障碍读者的总体双目标表现明显较差。元回归分析表明有两个变量与组间差异有关;RSVP前时间以及RSVP中第二个目标相对于第一个目标的时间变异性。讨论。研究表明,在发育性阅读障碍中,任务集时间特征的内源性参与较慢或受到干扰。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c76/4312065/1a06960cc1d9/peerj-03-746-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
No evidence for a prolonged attentional blink in developmental dyslexia.
Cortex. 2010 Nov-Dec;46(10):1317-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.06.010. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
3
No differential attentional blink in dyslexia after controlling for baseline sensitivity.
Vision Res. 2008 Jun;48(13):1497-502. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.03.008. Epub 2008 May 7.
4
The attentional blink in typically developing and reading-disabled children.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Nov;139:51-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
5
Dyslexia and practice in the attentional blink: evidence of slower task learning in dyslexia.
Cortex. 2011 Apr;47(4):494-500. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
8
Differences in the duration of the attentional blink when viewing nature vs. urban scenes.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Aug;85(6):1846-1867. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02749-7. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
9
The attentional blink is related to phonemic decoding, but not sight-word recognition, in typically reading adults.
Vision Res. 2015 Oct;115(Pt A):8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of attention shifting on Chinese children's word reading in primary school.
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2024 Feb 27;37(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41155-024-00290-6.
2
Inducing attention not to blink: auditory entrainment improves conscious visual processing.
Psychol Res. 2016 Sep;80(5):774-84. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0691-8. Epub 2015 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

1
The new statistics: why and how.
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;25(1):7-29. doi: 10.1177/0956797613504966. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
3
Shorter lines facilitate reading in those who struggle.
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 5;8(8):e71161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071161. Print 2013.
4
Training and the attentional blink: limits overcome or expectations raised?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):406-11. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0491-3.
5
The role of preparation time in the attentional blink.
Vision Res. 2013 Jan 14;76:68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.10.010. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
6
Project DyAdd: visual attention in adult dyslexia and ADHD.
Brain Cogn. 2012 Dec;80(3):311-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
7
When 'slime' becomes 'smile': developmental letter position dyslexia in English.
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Dec;50(14):3681-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.016. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
8
Visual temporal processing in dyslexia and the magnocellular deficit theory: the need for speed?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Dec;37(6):1957-75. doi: 10.1037/a0024668. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
10
Developmental attentional dyslexia.
Cortex. 2010 Nov-Dec;46(10):1216-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.06.012. Epub 2010 Jul 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验