Tellegen Cassandra L, Sofronoff Kate
School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia QLD 4072, Australia.
BMC Med. 2015 Feb 4;13:25. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0260-9.
The Stepping Stones Triple P (SSTP) parenting program is an evidence-based program for parents of children with a disability. A trial of SSTP was recently published in BMC Medicine, which reported results of a randomized controlled trial comparing SSTP to care-as-usual. Although the paper described what should be an important replication trial of SSTP, there are significant shortcomings to the scientific approach of the reporting that need to be addressed. The paper initially cites only a few published SSTP studies and describes evidence for the efficacy of the program as "very scarce". A meta-analysis of studies evaluating SSTP published prior to submission of this paper was not cited. The results are inconsistent with previous evidence for SSTP, yet the authors provide scant interpretation for this inconsistency. Similarly, the unusually high dropout rate of 49% was not adequately explained. The claims that previous research has only been conducted by the developers, has not included children with intellectual disability, and has not used care-as-usual comparison groups, are inaccurate. This commentary explores these issues further in order to place the findings from the recent trial into context.
“步步为营”三级预防(SSTP)育儿项目是一项针对残疾儿童家长的循证项目。SSTP的一项试验最近发表在《BMC医学》杂志上,该试验报告了一项将SSTP与常规护理进行比较的随机对照试验结果。尽管该论文描述了SSTP应是一项重要的重复试验,但报告的科学方法存在重大缺陷,需要加以解决。该论文最初仅引用了少数已发表的SSTP研究,并将该项目有效性的证据描述为“非常稀少”。在提交本文之前发表的评估SSTP的研究的荟萃分析未被引用。研究结果与SSTP先前的证据不一致,但作者对此不一致之处几乎没有给出解释。同样,49%的异常高辍学率也没有得到充分解释。声称之前的研究仅由开发者进行、未纳入智力残疾儿童且未使用常规护理对照组的说法是不准确的。本评论将进一步探讨这些问题,以便将最近试验的结果置于背景中。