Suppr超能文献

新辅助治疗后乳腺癌腋窝处理的前哨淋巴结活检:一项长期随访的单中心回顾性分析

Sentinel node biopsy for axillary management after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis with long follow-up.

作者信息

Ogawa Yoshinari, Ikeda Katsumi, Watanabe Chika, Kamei Yuri, Tokunaga Shinya, Tsuboguchi Yuko, Inoue Takeshi, Fukushima Hiroko, Ichiki Makoto

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Osaka City General Hospital, 2-13-22 Miyakojima-hondori, Miyakojima-ku, Osaka, 534-0021, Japan.

Department of Medical Oncology, Osaka City General Hospital, 2-13-22 Miyakojima-hondori, Miyakojima-ku, Osaka, 534-0021, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Today. 2018 Jan;48(1):87-94. doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1558-y. Epub 2017 Jun 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for breast cancer remains controversial. We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent SNB after NAT to evaluate the effectiveness of this procedure.

METHODS

A consecutive 105 women with locally advanced breast cancer (cT1-4, cN0-3, M0) were treated with NAT between 2006 and 2015. The subjects were 80 of these patients who became or remained clinically node-negative after NAT, 53 of whom had axillary management determined by SNB (group A) and the other 27 underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) without SNB (group B). SNB was performed using a modified dye method.

RESULTS

The sentinel node (SN) identification rate was 94.3% and the mean number of removed SNs was 2.4. ALND was avoided in 33 patients, who were confirmed as SN-negative. There was no difference in recurrence-free and overall survival rates between groups A and B (p = 0.71 and p = 0.46, respectively) during the median follow-up time of 63 months. Of the 33 patients who did not undergo ALND, 10 suffered recurrence (33%). One patient (3%) had recurrence in an axillary lymph node and four had recurrence in a supraclavicular lymph node.

CONCLUSION

Axillary SNB after NAT did not affect the axillary failure rate or the prognosis. SNB may be a reliable procedure, even after NAT.

摘要

目的

新辅助治疗(NAT)后乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检(SNB)仍存在争议。我们对接受NAT后行SNB的患者进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估该手术的有效性。

方法

2006年至2015年间,连续105例局部晚期乳腺癌(cT1 - 4,cN0 - 3,M0)女性接受了NAT治疗。研究对象为其中80例NAT后临床淋巴结转阴或仍为阴性的患者,其中53例通过SNB确定腋窝处理方式(A组),另外27例未行SNB直接进行腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)(B组)。SNB采用改良染料法进行。

结果

前哨淋巴结(SN)识别率为94.3%,切除的SN平均数量为2.4个。33例被证实为SN阴性的患者避免了ALND。在63个月的中位随访期内,A组和B组的无复发生存率和总生存率无差异(分别为p = 0.71和p = 0.46)。在未进行ALND的33例患者中,10例复发(33%)。1例患者(3%)腋窝淋巴结复发,4例患者锁骨上淋巴结复发。

结论

NAT后腋窝SNB不影响腋窝失败率或预后。即使在NAT后,SNB也可能是一种可靠的手术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验