Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Münster, Germany.
J Med Virol. 2015 May;87(5):860-70. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24124. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
Recurrent laryngeal papillomatosis (RLP) is, although benign, a challenging disease for both, the patient and the treating physician. Maximum disease control with minimum intervention is considered to be the gold standard. However, patients have to undergo repeating surgical interventions. Human papillomavirus (HPV), mainly so called low risk types, are thought to be responsible for the development of RLP. But, there is still some controversy over the true prevalence of HPV and the virus-specific molecular diagnostic of choice. Therefore archival tissue samples from 44 patients with RLP at laryngeal site, out of which eight developed laryngeal cancer, was screened for presence of HPV through various molecular approaches. Results from these different methodologies were compared between each other and with patient's characteristics. The overall detection rates of HPV with the various methods used in this study were: HPV16 E6/E7 PCR: 0%; GP5+/6+ PCR: 4.5%; CDKN2A/p16 immunohistochemistry: 6.8%; in-situ hybridization for low and high risk HPV types: 52.3%; HPV6/11 L1 PCR: 72.7% and HPV6/11 E6 PCR: 79.5%. Disease progression showed no apparent dependence of the detected HPV type or clinical variables like age at diagnosis, sex, or additional drug application (Cidofovir and Bevacizumab). In conclusion, the broad-spectrum PCRs alone or in combination with immunohistochemistry of CDKN2A/p16 and in-situ hybridization are unsuitable for HPV detection in RLP. Based on the findings presented in this study the type specific PCRs targeting the E6 open reading frame are clearly superior in detection of HPV in this tumor entity.
复发性喉乳头状瘤(RLP)虽然是良性的,但对患者和治疗医生来说都是一个具有挑战性的疾病。以最小的干预达到最大的疾病控制被认为是金标准。然而,患者必须接受重复的手术干预。人乳头瘤病毒(HPV),主要是所谓的低危型,被认为是 RLP 发展的原因。但是,关于 HPV 的真实流行率以及选择病毒特异性分子诊断仍然存在一些争议。因此,对 44 例喉部位 RLP 患者的存档组织样本进行了筛查,其中 8 例发展为喉癌,通过各种分子方法检测 HPV 的存在。将这些不同方法的结果相互比较,并与患者的特征进行比较。本研究中使用的各种方法检测 HPV 的总体检出率为:HPV16 E6/E7 PCR:0%;GP5+/6+ PCR:4.5%;CDKN2A/p16 免疫组化:6.8%;低危和高危 HPV 型原位杂交:52.3%;HPV6/11 L1 PCR:72.7%和 HPV6/11 E6 PCR:79.5%。疾病进展与检测到的 HPV 类型或临床变量(如诊断时的年龄、性别或额外药物应用(更昔洛韦和贝伐单抗))无明显相关性。总之,单独使用广谱 PCR 或与 CDKN2A/p16 免疫组化和原位杂交联合使用不适合用于 RLP 中的 HPV 检测。基于本研究中的发现,针对 E6 开放阅读框的特异性 PCR 在检测该肿瘤实体中的 HPV 方面明显更优越。