• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Individual versus collective protection: bioethical analysis of the national program of mass child vaccination].

作者信息

Lessa Sérgio de Castro, Schramm Fermin Roland

机构信息

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Bioética, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília DF, Brasil,

Departamento de Ciências Sociais, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fiocruz.

出版信息

Cien Saude Colet. 2015 Jan;20(1):115-24. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232014201.14882013.

DOI:10.1590/1413-81232014201.14882013
PMID:25650604
Abstract

Vaccination is considered one of the most efficient and cost-effective public health policies most used in the control and prevention of disease. However, it is also one of the most polemic and controversial biomedical techniques, making it difficult to avoid an ethical dilemma, especially when vaccination is compulsory for the entire population. Indeed, since vaccines are not totally effective and safe, there is an ethical conflict between the individual and the collective interest, because children effectively carry the burden of vaccination for the benefit of public health when they are affected with serious adverse reactions and do not benefit from the care that should be offered by the government. The objective of this article was to demonstrate that the tools of bioethics are relevant in this discussion to understand and analyze these dilemmas critically by providing convincing arguments to underpin the development of biopolitics that consider prevention not only rigorously, but also the joint responsibility of all as fundamental for individual and collective protection.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Individual versus collective protection: bioethical analysis of the national program of mass child vaccination].
Cien Saude Colet. 2015 Jan;20(1):115-24. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232014201.14882013.
2
[Vaccination programs between individual autonomy and common welfare].[个人自主权与公共福利之间的疫苗接种计划]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2008 Feb;51(2):175-83. doi: 10.1007/s00103-008-0448-2.
3
Mandatory influenza immunization for health care workers--an ethical discussion.医护人员强制接种流感疫苗——一场伦理讨论。
AAOHN J. 2007 Jan;55(1):34-9. doi: 10.1177/216507990705500105.
4
Vaccination and the prevention problem.
Bioethics. 2004 Nov;18(6):515-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00414.x.
5
From compulsory to voluntary immunisation: Italy's National Vaccination Plan (2005-7) and the ethical and organisational challenges facing public health policy-makers across Europe.从强制免疫到自愿免疫:意大利国家疫苗接种计划(2005 - 2007年)以及欧洲公共卫生政策制定者面临的伦理和组织挑战。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep;34(9):669-74. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.022343.
6
What is the responsibility of national government with respect to vaccination?国家政府在疫苗接种方面的职责是什么?
Vaccine. 2014 Dec 12;32(52):7163-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
7
Ethics and vaccination.伦理与疫苗接种
Scand J Public Health. 2004;32(3):172-8. doi: 10.1080/14034940310018192.
8
Vaccine mandates, value pluralism, and policy diversity.疫苗强制要求、价值多元主义与政策多样性。
Bioethics. 2019 Nov;33(9):1042-1049. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12645. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
9
The Social Value Of Vaccination Programs: Beyond Cost-Effectiveness.疫苗接种计划的社会价值:超越成本效益
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Feb;35(2):212-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1088.
10
Vaccination: Is There a Place for Penalties for Non-compliance?接种疫苗:对不遵守规定的行为进行处罚是否合理?
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Jun;17(3):265-271. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00460-z.

引用本文的文献

1
A Serious Game (Immunitates) About Immunization: Development and Validation Study.一款关于免疫接种的严肃游戏(Immunitates):开发与验证研究。
JMIR Serious Games. 2022 Feb 18;10(1):e30738. doi: 10.2196/30738.