Zimmermann E, Ostendorf F, Ploner C J, Lappe M
Institute for Psychology and Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany; Cognitive Neuroscience (INM3), Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany;
Department of Neurology, Charité-Universiätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Apr 1;113(7):2351-9. doi: 10.1152/jn.00744.2014. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
The frequent jumps of the eyeballs-called saccades-imply the need for a constant correction of motor errors. If systematic errors are detected in saccade landing, the saccade amplitude adapts to compensate for the error. In the laboratory, saccade adaptation can be studied by displacing the saccade target. Functional selectivity of adaptation for different saccade types suggests that adaptation occurs at multiple sites in the oculomotor system. Saccade motor learning might be the result of a comparison between a prediction of the saccade landing position and its actual postsaccadic location. To investigate whether a thalamic feedback pathway might carry such a prediction signal, we studied a patient with a lesion in the posterior ventrolateral thalamic nucleus. Saccade adaptation was tested for reactive saccades, which are performed to suddenly appearing targets, and for scanning saccades, which are performed to stationary targets. For reactive saccades, we found a clear impairment in adaptation retention ipsilateral to the lesioned side and a larger-than-normal adaptation on the contralesional side. For scanning saccades, adaptation was intact on both sides and not different from the control group. Our results provide the first lesion evidence that adaptation of reactive and scanning saccades relies on distinct feedback pathways from cerebellum to cortex. They further demonstrate that saccade adaptation in humans is not restricted to the cerebellum but also involves cortical areas. The paradoxically strong adaptation for outward target steps can be explained by stronger reliance on visual targeting errors when prediction error signaling is impaired.
眼球频繁跳动(即扫视)意味着需要不断纠正运动误差。如果在扫视落点检测到系统误差,扫视幅度会进行调整以补偿该误差。在实验室中,可以通过移动扫视目标来研究扫视适应性。不同扫视类型适应性的功能选择性表明,适应性发生在动眼神经系统的多个部位。扫视运动学习可能是扫视落点位置预测与扫视后实际位置比较的结果。为了研究丘脑反馈通路是否可能携带这样的预测信号,我们研究了一名后外侧丘脑核有损伤的患者。对反应性扫视(针对突然出现的目标进行)和扫描性扫视(针对静止目标进行)的适应性进行了测试。对于反应性扫视,我们发现损伤侧同侧的适应性保留明显受损,而对侧的适应性则大于正常水平。对于扫描性扫视,两侧的适应性均正常,与对照组无差异。我们的结果首次提供了损伤证据,表明反应性扫视和扫描性扫视的适应性依赖于从小脑到皮层的不同反馈通路。它们进一步证明,人类的扫视适应性不仅限于小脑,还涉及皮层区域。向外目标步幅出现的适应性异常增强可以通过预测误差信号受损时对视觉目标误差的更强依赖来解释。