• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿转运评分系统与转运相关死亡评分对预测新生儿死亡风险的比较。

Comparison of neonatal transport scoring systems and transport-related mortality score for predicting neonatal mortality risk.

作者信息

Sutcuoglu Sumer, Celik Tugce, Alkan Senem, Ilhan Ozkan, Ozer Esra Arun

机构信息

From the Tepecik Teaching and Research Hospital, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Feb;31(2):113-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000350.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000000350
PMID:25654677
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To predict the risk of mortality of neonates, birth weight and gestational age were previously used. However, these criteria were considered inadequate; therefore, various scoring systems have been developed in the recent years. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of predicting mortality by Mortality Index for Neonatal Transportation (MINT), Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology-Perinatal Extension II (SNAP-PE-II), and Transport Related Mortality Score (TREMS).

METHODS

All infants transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit between January 1 and December 31, 2011, were included. The scores of SNAP-PE-II, MINT, and TREMS of the all cases were calculated. TREMS is our proposed scoring system and it consists of 5 variables (hypoglycemia, hypoxia, hypercarbia, hypotension, and hypothermia). The scoring systems, SNAP-PE-II, MINT, and TREMS, were compared in terms of mortality risk.

RESULTS

A total of 306 newborn infants constituted the study population. The mean gestational age was 33.1 ± 5 weeks and the mean birth weight was 2031.2 ± 1018 g, and 183 (59%) babies were male. The sensitivity of MINT score for predicting mortality was higher than SNAP-PE-II and TREMS. However, specificity was higher in TREMS score. The negative predictive value was highest in MINT score, whereas TREMS has the highest positive predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

The TREMS scoring system is a simple scoring system with a high specificity for predicting mortality. Further studies with larger sample size including more centers and newborn infants with diverse clinical problems are needed to assess the validity and reliability of the TREMS scoring system.

摘要

目的

以往曾采用出生体重和胎龄来预测新生儿的死亡风险。然而,这些标准被认为并不充分;因此,近年来已开发出各种评分系统。本研究的目的是评估新生儿转运死亡率指数(MINT)、新生儿急性生理学围产期扩展Ⅱ评分(SNAP-PE-II)和转运相关死亡率评分(TREMS)在预测死亡率方面的表现。

方法

纳入2011年1月1日至12月31日期间转入新生儿重症监护病房的所有婴儿。计算所有病例的SNAP-PE-II、MINT和TREMS评分。TREMS是我们提出的评分系统,它由5个变量(低血糖、低氧血症、高碳酸血症、低血压和体温过低)组成。对SNAP-PE-II、MINT和TREMS这三种评分系统在死亡风险方面进行比较。

结果

共有306例新生儿构成研究人群。平均胎龄为33.1±5周,平均出生体重为2031.2±1018g,183例(59%)婴儿为男性。MINT评分预测死亡率的敏感性高于SNAP-PE-II和TREMS。然而,TREMS评分的特异性更高。MINT评分的阴性预测值最高,而TREMS的阳性预测值最高。

结论

TREMS评分系统是一种简单的评分系统,在预测死亡率方面具有较高的特异性。需要进行更大样本量、纳入更多中心以及患有各种临床问题的新生儿的进一步研究,以评估TREMS评分系统的有效性和可靠性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of neonatal transport scoring systems and transport-related mortality score for predicting neonatal mortality risk.新生儿转运评分系统与转运相关死亡评分对预测新生儿死亡风险的比较。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Feb;31(2):113-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000350.
2
Comparison of four neonatal transport scoring methods in the prediction of mortality risk in full-term, out-born infants: a single-center retrospective cohort study.比较四种新生儿转运评分方法在预测足月、外出出生婴儿死亡风险中的作用:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Aug;181(8):3005-3011. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04506-8. Epub 2022 May 26.
3
Evaluation of Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology and Perinatal Extension II and Clinical Risk Index for Babies with additional parameters.评估新生儿急性生理学及围生期扩展Ⅱ评分以及纳入额外参数的婴儿临床风险指数。
Pediatr Int. 2016 Oct;58(10):984-987. doi: 10.1111/ped.12973. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
4
[Predicting outcome in necrotizing enterocolitis with the score for neonatal acute physiology: a retrospective study of 62 cases].[用新生儿急性生理学评分预测坏死性小肠结肠炎的预后:62例回顾性研究]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2013 May;51(5):326-30.
5
Predicting deaths in a resource-limited neonatal intensive care unit in Nepal.尼泊尔资源有限的新生儿重症监护病房的死亡预测
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Jul 1;111(7):287-293. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trx053.
6
[A comparison of 4 pregnancy assessment scales (CRIB, SNAP, SNAP-PE, NTISS) in premature newborns. Clinical Risk Index for Babies. Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology. Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology-Perinatal Extension. Neonatal Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System].[4种早产新生儿妊娠评估量表(CRIB、SNAP、SNAP-PE、NTISS)的比较。婴儿临床风险指数。新生儿急性生理学评分。新生儿急性生理学-围产期扩展评分。新生儿治疗干预评分系统]
Acta Med Port. 1997 Feb-Mar;10(2-3):161-5.
7
Score for neonatal acute physiology: validation in three Kaiser Permanente neonatal intensive care units.新生儿急性生理学评分:在三个凯撒医疗机构新生儿重症监护病房的验证
Pediatrics. 1995 Nov;96(5 Pt 1):918-22.
8
A comparison of neonatal mortality risk prediction models in very low birth weight infants.极低出生体重儿新生儿死亡风险预测模型的比较
Pediatrics. 2000 May;105(5):1051-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.5.1051.
9
Utilization of SNAP II and SNAPPE II Scores for Predicting the Mortality Rate Among a Cohort of Iranian Newborns.利用 SNAP II 和 SNAPPE II 评分预测伊朗新生儿队列的死亡率。
Arch Iran Med. 2018 Apr 1;21(4):153-157.
10
Predicting Outcome in Neonates with Possible Clinical Sepsis by Estimating an Early Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology-II (SNAP-II).通过估算新生儿急性生理学评分-Ⅱ(SNAP-Ⅱ)的早期评分预测可能患有临床败血症的新生儿的结局。
J Trop Pediatr. 2020 Aug 1;66(4):377-384. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmz076.

引用本文的文献

1
[Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of common neonatal diseases in primary healthcare institutions: neonatal transport (2025)].《基层医疗卫生机构常见新生儿疾病诊疗指南:新生儿转运(2025年版)》
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Jul 15;27(7):759-769. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2412152.
2
Evaluation of specific quality metrics to assess the performance of a specialised newborn transport programme.评估特定质量指标以评估专门新生儿转运计划的性能。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Jun;179(6):919-928. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03573-z. Epub 2020 Jan 28.