Department of Philosophy, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA; School of Humanities, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK; Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
World Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;14(1):5-14. doi: 10.1002/wps.20173.
The philosophical and interdisciplinary debate about the nature of social cognition, and the processes involved, has important implications for psychiatry. On one account, mindreading depends on making theoretical inferences about another person's mental states based on knowledge of folk psychology, the so-called "theory theory" (TT). On a different account, "simulation theory" (ST), mindreading depends on simulating the other's mental states within one's own mental or motor system. A third approach, "interaction theory" (IT), looks to embodied processes (involving movement, gesture, facial expression, vocal intonation, etc.) and the dynamics of intersubjective interactions (joint attention, joint action, and processes not confined to an individual system) in highly contextualized situations to explain social cognition, and disruptions of these processes in some psychopathological conditions. In this paper, we present a brief summary of these three theoretical frameworks (TT, ST, IT). We then focus on impaired social abilities in autism and schizophrenia from the perspective of the three approaches. We discuss the limitations of such approaches in the scientific studies of these and other pathologies, and we close with a short reflection on the future of the field. In this regard we argue that, to the extent that TT, ST and IT offer explanations that capture different (limited) aspects of social cognition, a pluralist approach might be best.
关于社会认知的本质及其涉及的过程的哲学和跨学科争论,对精神病学有重要影响。一种观点认为,心理理论依赖于根据对民间心理学(所谓的“理论理论”[TT])的了解,对他人的心理状态做出理论推断。在另一种观点中,“模拟理论”(ST)认为心理理论依赖于在自己的心理或运动系统内模拟他人的心理状态。第三种方法,“相互作用理论”(IT),则着眼于在高度语境化的情境中,涉及运动、手势、面部表情、语音语调等的体现过程(embodied processes)以及主体间相互作用(共同关注、共同行动以及不限于个体系统的过程),来解释社会认知,以及这些过程在某些精神病理条件下的中断。在本文中,我们简要总结了这三个理论框架(TT、ST、IT)。然后,我们从这三种方法的角度关注自闭症和精神分裂症患者的社交能力障碍。我们讨论了这些方法在对这些和其他病理学的科学研究中的局限性,最后对该领域的未来进行了简短的反思。在这方面,我们认为,在 TT、ST 和 IT 提供的解释能够捕捉到社会认知的不同(有限)方面的程度上,多元主义方法可能是最好的。