Kocman Mikuláš, Jurečka Petr, Dubecký Matúš, Otyepka Michal, Cho Yeonchoo, Kim Kwang S
Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, 17. listopadu 12, 77146 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015 Mar 7;17(9):6423-32. doi: 10.1039/c4cp04354e.
Hydrogen storage in carbonaceous materials and their derivatives is currently a widely investigated topic. The rational design of novel adsorptive materials is often attempted with the help of computational chemistry tools, in particular density functional theory (DFT). However, different exchange-correlation functionals provide a very wide range of hydrogen binding energies. The aim of this article is to offer high level QM reference data based on coupled-cluster singles and doubles calculations with perturbative triple excitations, CCSD(T), and a complete basis set limit estimate that can be used to assess the accuracy of various DFT-based predictions. For one complex, the CCSD(T) result is verified against diffusion quantum Monte Carlo calculations. Reference binding curves are calculated for two model compounds representing weak and strong hydrogen adsorption: coronene (-4.7 kJ mol(-1) per H2), and coronene modified with boron and lithium (-14.3 kJ mol(-1)). The reference data are compared to results obtained with widely used density functionals including pure DFT, M06, DFT-D3, PBE-TS, PBE + MBD, optB88-vdW, vdW-DF, vdW-DF2 and VV10. We find that whereas DFT-D3 shows excellent results for weak hydrogen adsorption on coronene, most of the less empirical density based dispersion functionals except VV10 overestimate this interaction. On the other hand, some of the less empirical density based dispersion functionals better describe stronger binding in the more polar coroB2Li22H2 complex which is one of realistic models for high-capacity hydrogen storage materials. Our results may serve as a guide for choosing suitable DFT methods for quickly evaluating hydrogen binding potential and as a reference for assessing the accuracy of the previously published DFT results.
碳质材料及其衍生物中的储氢是当前一个广泛研究的课题。新型吸附材料的合理设计常常借助计算化学工具来尝试,特别是密度泛函理论(DFT)。然而,不同的交换关联泛函给出的氢结合能范围非常广。本文的目的是基于含微扰三重激发的耦合簇单双激发计算(CCSD(T))以及完整基组极限估计提供高水平的量子力学参考数据,这些数据可用于评估各种基于DFT预测的准确性。对于一个配合物,CCSD(T)结果通过扩散量子蒙特卡罗计算进行了验证。计算了代表弱氢吸附和强氢吸附的两种模型化合物的参考结合曲线:蒄(每个H₂为 -4.7 kJ mol⁻¹)以及用硼和锂修饰的蒄(-14.3 kJ mol⁻¹)。将参考数据与使用广泛的密度泛函得到的结果进行了比较,这些密度泛函包括纯DFT、M₀₆、DFT-D3、PBE-TS、PBE + MBD、optB88-vdW、vdW-DF、vdW-DF2和VV10。我们发现,虽然DFT-D3在蒄上的弱氢吸附方面显示出优异的结果,但除VV10外,大多数基于密度的经验性较弱的色散泛函高估了这种相互作用。另一方面,一些基于密度的经验性较弱的色散泛函能更好地描述极性更强的coroB₂Li₂₂H₂配合物中的更强结合,该配合物是高容量储氢材料的现实模型之一。我们的结果可作为选择合适的DFT方法快速评估氢结合潜力的指南,并作为评估先前发表的DFT结果准确性的参考。