• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性病患者对个人健康设备的接受情况。

The acceptance of personal health devices among patients with chronic conditions.

作者信息

Sun Na, Rau Pei-Luen Patrick

机构信息

Institute of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

Institute of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2015 Apr;84(4):288-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.01.002
PMID:25655783
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Personal health devices (PHDs) are rapidly developing and getting smarter. But little is known about chronic patients' acceptance of such PHDs.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to explore how chronic patients accept PHDs and what are the main factors that predict use intention of PHDs. The results will provide suggestions for the design of PHDs and e-health services.

METHOD

A questionnaire survey was conducted to identify the main factors that affect chronic patients' acceptance of PHDs. Three hundred and forty-six valid responses from chronic patients were collected and the data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis and regression analysis method. The questionnaire also included questions about respondents' experience of PHDs and preference of PHD functions. These questions help to understand lived experience of PHD users and to explain the factors that influence their use intention.

RESULT

Five influencing factors that predict use intention of PHDs were identified: attitude toward technology, perceived usefulness, ease of learning and availability, social support, and perceived pressure. An acceptance model of PHDs was proposed based on these factors, and suggestions for PHD designers and e-health service designers were discussed. The exploration of PHD experience indicated that ease of learning and social norm significantly influenced PHD use intention, and many respondents expressed negative opinions on the accuracy, durability and maintenance service of PHDs. Besides, people generally expressed positive attitude toward future functions of a PHD.

摘要

背景

个人健康设备(PHDs)正在迅速发展并变得更加智能。但对于慢性病患者对这类个人健康设备的接受情况却知之甚少。

目的

本研究的目的是探讨慢性病患者如何接受个人健康设备以及预测个人健康设备使用意愿的主要因素有哪些。研究结果将为个人健康设备及电子健康服务的设计提供建议。

方法

通过问卷调查来确定影响慢性病患者接受个人健康设备的主要因素。收集了346份慢性病患者的有效回复,并使用探索性因素分析和回归分析方法对数据进行分析。问卷还包括有关受访者使用个人健康设备的体验以及对个人健康设备功能偏好的问题。这些问题有助于了解个人健康设备用户的实际体验,并解释影响其使用意愿的因素。

结果

确定了五个预测个人健康设备使用意愿的影响因素:对技术的态度、感知有用性、学习易用性和可得性、社会支持以及感知压力。基于这些因素提出了个人健康设备的接受模型,并讨论了对个人健康设备设计者和电子健康服务设计者的建议。对个人健康设备体验的探索表明,学习易用性和社会规范显著影响个人健康设备的使用意愿,许多受访者对个人健康设备的准确性、耐用性和维护服务表达了负面意见。此外,人们普遍对个人健康设备的未来功能持积极态度。

相似文献

1
The acceptance of personal health devices among patients with chronic conditions.慢性病患者对个人健康设备的接受情况。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Apr;84(4):288-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
2
Modeling patients' acceptance of provider-delivered e-health.模拟患者对医疗服务提供者提供的电子健康服务的接受情况。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Jul-Aug;11(4):241-8. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1475. Epub 2004 Apr 2.
3
Patients' Acceptance of Smartphone Health Technology for Chronic Disease Management: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Test.患者对用于慢性病管理的智能手机健康技术的接受度:一个理论模型与实证检验
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Dec 6;5(12):e177. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7886.
4
Factors in the 4-week Acceptance of a Computer-Based, Chronic Disease Self-Monitoring System in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and/or Hypertension.2 型糖尿病和/或高血压患者对基于计算机的慢性病自我监测系统 4 周接受度的影响因素。
Telemed J E Health. 2018 Feb;24(2):121-129. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0064. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
5
Predictive factors of telemedicine service acceptance and behavioral intention of physicians.预测医师接受远程医疗服务和行为意向的因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Aug;83(8):559-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
6
Elder acceptance of health monitoring devices in the home.老年人对家庭健康监测设备的接受度。
Care Manag J. 2001;3(2):91-8.
7
User acceptance of mobile health services from users' perspectives: The role of self-efficacy and response-efficacy in technology acceptance.从用户角度看用户对移动健康服务的接受度:自我效能感和反应效能感在技术接受中的作用
Inform Health Soc Care. 2017 Mar;42(2):194-206. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2016.1200053. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
8
Exploring key factors in the choice of e-health using an asthma care mobile service model.探索使用哮喘护理移动服务模型选择电子健康的关键因素。
Telemed J E Health. 2009 Nov;15(9):884-90. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0047.
9
The Role of Information Technology Mindfulness in the Postadoption Stage of Using Personal Health Devices: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study in Mobile Health.信息技术正念在个人健康设备使用后采用阶段的作用:移动健康中的横断面问卷调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 5;8(10):e18122. doi: 10.2196/18122.
10
Determinants of physicians' technology acceptance for e-health in ambulatory care.门诊医疗中影响医生接受电子健康技术的因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Nov;81(11):746-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Building trust in long-term care settings using assistive technology: a systematic review.利用辅助技术在长期护理环境中建立信任:一项系统综述。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Nov 22;5:1492104. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1492104. eCollection 2024.
2
The acceptability of wearable technology for long-term respiratory disease: A cross-sectional survey.可穿戴技术在长期呼吸系统疾病中的可接受性:一项横断面调查。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 5;10(16):e35474. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35474. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
3
Attributes, Methods, and Frameworks Used to Evaluate Wearables and Their Companion mHealth Apps: Scoping Review.
评估可穿戴设备及其配套移动健康应用程序所使用的属性、方法和框架:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Apr 5;12:e52179. doi: 10.2196/52179.
4
User acceptance of smart home voice assistant: a comparison among younger, middle-aged, and older adults.用户对智能家居语音助手的接受度:年轻人、中年人和老年人之间的比较。
Univers Access Inf Soc. 2022 Oct 30:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10209-022-00936-1.
5
Adoption of mobile health services using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model: Self-efficacy and privacy concerns.基于技术接受与使用统一理论模型的移动健康服务采用:自我效能感与隐私担忧
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 11;13:944976. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.944976. eCollection 2022.
6
The Influence of Gamification and Information Technology Identity on Postadoption Behaviors of Health and Fitness App Users: Empirical Study in the United States.游戏化和信息技术身份对健康与健身应用程序用户采纳后行为的影响:美国的实证研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Jul 5;9(3):e28282. doi: 10.2196/28282.
7
Assessing the usability of wearable devices to measure gait and physical activity in chronic conditions: a systematic review.评估可穿戴设备在慢性病中测量步态和身体活动的可用性:系统评价。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Sep 15;18(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00931-2.
8
Older Adults' Experiences With Using Wearable Devices: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis.老年人使用可穿戴设备的体验:定性系统评价和元综合。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 3;9(6):e23832. doi: 10.2196/23832.
9
Wearable Devices for Assessing Function in Alzheimer's Disease: A European Public Involvement Activity About the Features and Preferences of Patients and Caregivers.用于评估阿尔茨海默病功能的可穿戴设备:一项关于患者及护理人员的特征与偏好的欧洲公众参与活动
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Apr 12;13:643135. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.643135. eCollection 2021.
10
Effectiveness of a Mobile Health and Self-Management App for High-Risk Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Daily Clinical Practice: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.移动健康和自我管理应用程序对慢性阻塞性肺疾病高危患者日常临床实践效果的影响:混合方法评估研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 4;9(2):e21977. doi: 10.2196/21977.