Mann W C, Marchant T, Tomita M, Fraas L, Stanton K
Care Manag J. 2001;3(2):91-8.
This study examined frail elders' acceptance of the concept of home monitoring devices. With the potential of such devices to ultimately assist many older persons, acceptance of the device in the individual's home is a critical component. Elders who view devices negatively--as unnecessary, unattractive, or intrusive--may be less likely to use the device if installed or less likely to allow them to be installed. For the participants in the current study, the results suggest strong acceptance of the concept of home health monitoring and the devices to make the system work. When questioned on device appearance a majority of the subjects felt that the devices would be acceptable in their homes, and initial reactions to the devices were primarily favorable. Equipment characteristics have been identified as one of the determining factors of perceived intrusiveness of home monitoring devices (Fisk, 1997). Study participants made several suggestions pertaining to device features and appearance. A common criticism related to device size, especially concerning the blood pressure cuff which was referred to as "gaudy" by one study participant. Participants offered suggestions such as making devices smaller, providing control for volume adjustment, and providing voice activation. At least one participant expressed a concern over device functioning in the event of distance traveling. Subjective comments such as "I think it would help many people," "It's very reasonable and important in several ways," and "...people would be more independent and safe," provided anecdotal support of device acceptance. Although a majority of the study participants had favorable responses to the devices and monitoring systems, many of their subjective comments reflected positive views regarding use by others as opposed to personal use. This finding may suggest that the participants did not personally identify with the need to use such devices but rather viewed the devices as relevant and acceptable for "the person who absolutely needs it." However, a majority of the participants identified "relieving personal worry" as a possible benefit of the home monitoring system which suggests personal identification with the potential benefits. The findings of study participants' willingness to pay, and a desire to maintain communications on a consistent basis with monitoring services, may demonstrate overall acceptance of the idea of home monitoring devices/services and establishes a need for continued research in product development. During the interviews, many of the subjects expressed enthusiasm and interest over the prospect of the home monitoring devices and systems with which they were relatively unfamiliar. This suggests a need for further consumer education regarding use of home monitoring devices and systems. Aside from the relatively small sample size, one limitation of this study relates to the study participants' understanding of the devices in relation to their current needs. The questionnaire results provided hypothetical acceptance of devices from a usefulness and aesthetic point of view. However, the findings may not totally reflect the study participants' actual willingness or desire to utilize the applicable devices in their homes. Further research is suggested in the area of assessment of potential consumer groups' perceptions of their current health status, functional limitations and needs, and more extensive research regarding perceptions of the potential benefits of using home monitoring devices. Further research in product development and clinical trials of existing home monitoring devices is also recommended.
本研究调查了体弱老年人对家庭监测设备概念的接受程度。鉴于此类设备最终有可能帮助众多老年人,个人在家中对该设备的接受程度是一个关键因素。那些对设备持负面看法(认为其不必要、不美观或侵扰性强)的老年人,如果设备已安装,使用该设备的可能性可能较小,或者不太可能允许安装这些设备。对于本研究的参与者而言,结果表明他们对家庭健康监测概念以及使该系统运行的设备接受度较高。当被问及设备外观时,大多数受试者认为这些设备在他们家中是可以接受的,并且对这些设备的初步反应主要是积极的。设备特性已被确定为家庭监测设备感知侵扰性的决定性因素之一(菲斯克,1997年)。研究参与者就设备功能和外观提出了一些建议。一个常见的批评与设备尺寸有关,特别是血压袖带,有一位研究参与者称其“花哨”。参与者提出了一些建议,比如将设备做得更小、提供音量调节控制以及语音激活功能。至少有一位参与者表达了对设备在远距离出行时功能的担忧。诸如“我认为它会帮助很多人”“在几个方面它非常合理且重要”以及“……人们会更加独立和安全”等主观评论,为设备的接受度提供了轶事性支持。尽管大多数研究参与者对这些设备和监测系统给出了积极回应,但他们的许多主观评论反映出对他人使用的积极看法,而非个人使用。这一发现可能表明,参与者个人并未认同使用此类设备的必要性,而是认为这些设备对于“绝对需要它的人”而言是相关且可接受的。然而,大多数参与者认为“减轻个人担忧”是家庭监测系统的一个可能益处,这表明他们认同其潜在益处。研究参与者愿意付费以及希望与监测服务持续保持沟通的结果,可能表明他们总体上接受家庭监测设备/服务的理念,并确立了在产品开发方面持续进行研究的必要性。在访谈过程中,许多受试者对他们相对不熟悉的家庭监测设备和系统表现出热情和兴趣。这表明需要针对家庭监测设备和系统的使用对消费者进行进一步教育。除了样本规模相对较小之外,本研究的一个局限性在于研究参与者对设备与其当前需求关系的理解。问卷结果从实用性和美学角度提供了对设备的假设性接受情况。然而,这些发现可能并未完全反映研究参与者在家中实际使用适用设备的意愿或欲望。建议在评估潜在消费群体对其当前健康状况、功能限制和需求的认知方面进行进一步研究,以及就使用家庭监测设备的潜在益处的认知进行更广泛的研究。还建议在现有家庭监测设备的产品开发和临床试验方面进行进一步研究。