Maruyama Takuto, Kohno Hiroki, Ishida Keiichi, Ishizaka Toru, Funabashi Nobusada, Kobayashi Yoshio, Matsumiya Goro
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Science and Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Heart Vessels. 2016 Apr;31(4):474-81. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0639-3. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
The radial artery is increasingly used as a second arterial conduit for myocardial revascularization. However, the radial artery is susceptible to vasospasm, which is thought to be the principal cause of graft failure. The radial artery is harvested as a skeletonized or a non-skeletonized graft, but the effect of different harvesting technique remains unknown. In this study, we compared the early- and mid-term angiographic findings to elucidate its influence on the graft luminal diameter. We harvested 39 radial arteries either as a skeletonized (n = 18) or a non-skeletonized graft (n = 21) using an ultrasonic scalpel. We constructed a composite straight graft by combining a right internal thoracic artery and a radial artery. All the radial artery grafts were sequentially anastomosed to coronary arteries. We measured the diameters of the radial arteries before the operation, within 1 month and 1 year after the operation. At early postoperative period, graft diameter was significantly larger in skeletonized grafts. Graft diameter at the point before the first and the second anastomosis was similar in skeletonized grafts, although that was significantly smaller before the second anastomosis in non-skeletonized grafts. However, 1 year after the operation, the graft diameter was comparable and equally reduced after the first anastomosis in both groups. Skeletonization with an ultrasonic scalpel increases the luminal diameter of the radial artery graft at early postoperative period, which, however, reduces possibly as adaptation to graft flow 1 year after the operation.
桡动脉越来越多地被用作心肌血运重建的第二条动脉管道。然而,桡动脉易发生血管痉挛,这被认为是移植物失败的主要原因。桡动脉作为骨骼化或非骨骼化移植物进行采集,但不同采集技术的效果尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们比较了早期和中期的血管造影结果,以阐明其对移植物管腔直径的影响。我们使用超声手术刀采集了39条桡动脉,其中18条作为骨骼化移植物,21条作为非骨骼化移植物。我们将右胸廓内动脉和桡动脉组合构建了一个复合直移植物。所有桡动脉移植物均依次与冠状动脉吻合。我们测量了手术前、手术后1个月和1年时桡动脉的直径。在术后早期,骨骼化移植物的移植物直径明显更大。在骨骼化移植物中,第一次和第二次吻合前的移植物直径相似,尽管在非骨骼化移植物中,第二次吻合前的移植物直径明显更小。然而,手术后1年,两组的移植物直径相当,且第一次吻合后均同等程度减小。使用超声手术刀进行骨骼化处理在术后早期增加了桡动脉移植物的管腔直径,然而,在手术后1年可能会因适应移植物血流而减小。